Jon Wilner on UW's soft, flaccid, cupcake, cream puff schedule

YellowSnow

CHRIST. Yet another pundit goes with the now cliché 11-1 with loss at The Farm. Come on mainstream college football media - do better! Everyone knows we aren't loosing to the Trees this year. They are overrated with a shitty ass and gimpy QB. Shaw gives you no in game advantage, etc, etc. It's 12-0 or 1 mind boggling upset loss to someone we aren't expecting to loose to- e.g., UCLA w/ 4th string QB ( @RaceBannon narrative ) or shitting the bed the in the dessert somehow to an illiterate coaching staff.
http://www.mercurynews.com/2017/08/24/washington-football-projecting-the-season-game-by-game/

And postscriptum to Boobs...

PurpleBaze

Doesn't Wilner suck Duck cock?

89ute

Wow, @Pitchfork51 true??!!?

With 25 blue chips on the roster yielding one conference win? I'm not buying that ASU is this bad. I also think Manny Wilkins is a decent QB (keep in mind my point of reference) as long as he stops hurdling people.

YellowSnow

89ute said:

Wow, @Pitchfork51 true??!!?

With 25 blue chips on the roster yielding one conference win? I'm not buying that ASU is this bad. I also think Manny Wilkins is a decent QB (keep in mind my point of reference) as long as he stops hurdling people.

ASU sucks but they do have more BC's on their roster than any of the other shitty teams in the conference, and they have a bye to prepare, and we suck in he desert, blah, blah, blah.

Mosster47

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

YellowSnow

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

89ute

YellowSnow said:

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)

Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.

89ute

89ute said:

YellowSnow said:

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)

Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.

Looks like he's only had 3 (conference only) undefeated seasons. Less than I thought, but still.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Petersen

YellowSnow

89ute said:

89ute said:

YellowSnow said:

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)

Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.

Looks like he's only had 3 (conference only) undefeated seasons. Less than I thought, but still.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chris_Petersen

He has as much experience as any coach running the table against shitty competition, but there still were plenty of 1 loss that had let down games against Nevada, SDSU, TCU, etc. But sill, his culture improves the odds of taking care of business against teams you should beat.

FireCohen

YellowSnow said:

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

When the fuck did UCLA get a oline? They have the highest ceiling, but they can't protect their QB.

Tripper_Johnson

"The Huskies, meanwhile, commit a spate of mental errors."

How many Petersen teams commit a large number of mental errors in one game?

FireCohen

We going to lose 1-2 games due to kicking

PurpleBaze

WeakarmCobra said:

We going to lose 1-2 games due to kicking

...and/or Babushka.

YellowSnow

WeakarmCobra said:

We going to lose 1-2 games due to kicking

Guess we'll have to either be a go for it on 4th down or Jake pooch punt sort of team in 2017.

AZDuck

Jon Wilner is a fag

He is too, you boys

https://youtu.be/-uv_WGEHr4I

FireCohen

YellowSnow said:

WeakarmCobra said:

We going to lose 1-2 games due to kicking

Guess we'll have to either be a go for it on 4th down or Jake pooch punt sort of team in 2017.

Are pooch field goals legal in college football?

Pitchfork51

89ute said:

Wow, @Pitchfork51 true??!!?

With 25 blue chips on the roster yielding one conference win? I'm not buying that ASU is this bad. I also think Manny Wilkins is a decent QB (keep in mind my point of reference) as long as he stops hurdling people.

Honestly I don't fucking know.

It really comes down to generally recruiting well except the travesty that is our defensive backfield.

Add in being on our 4th string qb by game 5 and Graham meddling on every play on d and you have the disaster that was last year.

Really though last year wasn't the issue. We always knew it would be shit. It was 2015. That team should have won 9 and fucked up bad.



Either we have a good season or we don't and get a new coach.

I can't accept ever losing to fucking colorado, Utah (sorry but fuck you), or u of a.

Ewiwbi

HuskyJW

WeakarmCobra said:

YellowSnow said:

WeakarmCobra said:

We going to lose 1-2 games due to kicking

Guess we'll have to either be a go for it on 4th down or Jake pooch punt sort of team in 2017.

Are pooch field goals legal in college football?

Yes...legal kick. The ball just has to hit the ground before kicking it.

89ute

Pitchfork51 said:

89ute said:

Wow, @Pitchfork51 true??!!?

With 25 blue chips on the roster yielding one conference win? I'm not buying that ASU is this bad. I also think Manny Wilkins is a decent QB (keep in mind my point of reference) as long as he stops hurdling people.

Honestly I don't fucking know.

It really comes down to generally recruiting well except the travesty that is our defensive backfield.

Add in being on our 4th string qb by game 5 and Graham meddling on every play on d and you have the disaster that was last year.

Really though last year wasn't the issue. We always knew it would be shit. It was 2015. That team should have won 9 and fucked up bad.



Either we have a good season or we don't and get a new coach.

I can't accept ever losing to fucking colorado, Utah (sorry but fuck you), or u of a.

Ewiwbi

You shouldn't accept losing to any single digit blue chip count school. Add OSU, Cal and WSU to your list.

I'm surprised Erickson didn't do better than he did. I assume ASU still had double digit BCs then too?

FremontTroll

89ute said:

YellowSnow said:

Mosster47 said:

The conference overall is going to be a lot better. The three high school games before conference play is helpful though.

I see 10-2 for the Doogs.

I think OSU, UCLA and UO will all be harder outs than last year, but I also think we? are a better team than last year. The way I see it is:

10-2 - 25%
11- 1 - 50%
12-0 - 25%

I put your 12-0 much higher. If yooze have a loss, it's a WTF loss. Pete built his career at Boise avoiding WTF losses. It would not shock me if Pete has more undefeated seasons than any other coach. (this is a good question by the way)

Pete knows how to run the table against inferior competition.

Apologies in advance for injecting some MAFF into the discussion but a 25% chance of going undefeated over a 12 game schedule is extremely high.

UW would basically need to be >95% favorites in every single game.

.96^12=.69

Small probabilities accumulate over 12 games.

Then throw in a couple games where UW is less than 66% to win and it is pretty much impossible to get to 25%.

Pitchfork51

89ute said:

Pitchfork51 said:

89ute said:

Wow, @Pitchfork51 true??!!?

With 25 blue chips on the roster yielding one conference win? I'm not buying that ASU is this bad. I also think Manny Wilkins is a decent QB (keep in mind my point of reference) as long as he stops hurdling people.

Honestly I don't fucking know.

It really comes down to generally recruiting well except the travesty that is our defensive backfield.

Add in being on our 4th string qb by game 5 and Graham meddling on every play on d and you have the disaster that was last year.

Really though last year wasn't the issue. We always knew it would be shit. It was 2015. That team should have won 9 and fucked up bad.



Either we have a good season or we don't and get a new coach.

I can't accept ever losing to fucking colorado, Utah (sorry but fuck you), or u of a.

Ewiwbi

You shouldn't accept losing to any single digit blue chip count school. Add OSU, Cal and WSU to your list.

I'm surprised Erickson didn't do better than he did. I assume ASU still had double digit BCs then too?

Where are you getting the bc numbers? I didn't read the article. Or is this a tbs board thing