Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Somebody needs to tell the 16 recruits in Oregon's #4 rated class

135678

Comments

  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,039 Founders Club
    Oregon does have a huge advantage with teen boys due to the Duckade. That won't go away over night.

    At the beginning of the Duckade, UW still did good in recruiting in relation to Oregon. The first 4 or 5 losses we would pick UW to win because of recruiting.

    But Taggert is going to have to coach. We know that. Helfrich had talent last year.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dnc
    dnc Member Posts: 56,855
    YellowSnow said:

    dnc said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    LIPO. Right now Taggart is taking the Sark recruiting approach by offering anyone and everyone rated by a recruiting site a scholarship. Except he doesn't have to deal with 0-12!!1

    I think Taggart will have a Sark type career at Oregon. He will recruit above average but people will make it seem like he's killing it, he will lose games he shouldn't and beat some overrated ranked teams to keep his job longer than he should.

    Sort of agree but he's recruiting better than Sark ever did.
    Agree but 2017 Oregon > 2009 Washington. You people act like @Owen12 never happened.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • YellowSnow
    YellowSnow Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,854 Founders Club
    RaceBannon said:

    Oregon does have a huge advantage with teen boys due to the Duckade. That won't go away over night.

    At the beginning of the Duckade, UW still did good in recruiting in relation to Oregon. The first 4 or 5 losses we would pick UW to win because of recruiting.

    But Taggert is going to have to coach. We know that. Helfrich had talent last year.

    I guess I'm still in a doogish, BONEM, mind set, but Oregon at home (ok Eugene...hardy har har) is the game I have circled on the calendar as being the one we cannot fucking lose. It's going to take more than one finger point and 70-21 to take all the shine off their brand.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    LIPO. Right now Taggart is taking the Sark recruiting approach by offering anyone and everyone rated by a recruiting site a scholarship. Except he doesn't have to deal with 0-12!!1

    I think Taggart will have a Sark type career at Oregon. He will recruit above average but people will make it seem like he's killing it, he will lose games he shouldn't and beat some overrated ranked teams to keep his job longer than he should.

    Agree with Waffle and Gladstone here and have a hard time envisioning Coach T getting them back to the promised land circa 2009- 14, but as one who isn't that much into the TBS part of this, was curious if we? should be concerned yet at this juncture- i.e, #4 ranked class with 16 recruits thus far (our star rating per kid is higher, however).
    This is what reminds me of Sark. Start off in a blaze of glory but trail in star ratings. By LOI day that top ten class would be closer to 20 and worse with average rating.

    Not saying that is the case at Oregon this year so don't twist. Just saying it looks familiar.

    Taggert can lose to us? 34 -17 (rather easily) and the quooks would gush over the massive improvement from 70-21.

    Or he could win in Seattle and we? break the internet
    Sorry to disappoint but quooks won't gush over anything other than a win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 116,039 Founders Club
    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    LIPO. Right now Taggart is taking the Sark recruiting approach by offering anyone and everyone rated by a recruiting site a scholarship. Except he doesn't have to deal with 0-12!!1

    I think Taggart will have a Sark type career at Oregon. He will recruit above average but people will make it seem like he's killing it, he will lose games he shouldn't and beat some overrated ranked teams to keep his job longer than he should.

    Agree with Waffle and Gladstone here and have a hard time envisioning Coach T getting them back to the promised land circa 2009- 14, but as one who isn't that much into the TBS part of this, was curious if we? should be concerned yet at this juncture- i.e, #4 ranked class with 16 recruits thus far (our star rating per kid is higher, however).
    This is what reminds me of Sark. Start off in a blaze of glory but trail in star ratings. By LOI day that top ten class would be closer to 20 and worse with average rating.

    Not saying that is the case at Oregon this year so don't twist. Just saying it looks familiar.

    Taggert can lose to us? 34 -17 (rather easily) and the quooks would gush over the massive improvement from 70-21.

    Or he could win in Seattle and we? break the internet
    Sorry to disappoint but quooks won't gush over anything other than a win.
    Disagree

    #script
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    RaceBannon said:

    oregonblitzkrieg said:

    RaceBannon said:

    YellowSnow said:

    CuntWaffle said:

    LIPO. Right now Taggart is taking the Sark recruiting approach by offering anyone and everyone rated by a recruiting site a scholarship. Except he doesn't have to deal with 0-12!!1

    I think Taggart will have a Sark type career at Oregon. He will recruit above average but people will make it seem like he's killing it, he will lose games he shouldn't and beat some overrated ranked teams to keep his job longer than he should.

    Agree with Waffle and Gladstone here and have a hard time envisioning Coach T getting them back to the promised land circa 2009- 14, but as one who isn't that much into the TBS part of this, was curious if we? should be concerned yet at this juncture- i.e, #4 ranked class with 16 recruits thus far (our star rating per kid is higher, however).
    This is what reminds me of Sark. Start off in a blaze of glory but trail in star ratings. By LOI day that top ten class would be closer to 20 and worse with average rating.

    Not saying that is the case at Oregon this year so don't twist. Just saying it looks familiar.

    Taggert can lose to us? 34 -17 (rather easily) and the quooks would gush over the massive improvement from 70-21.

    Or he could win in Seattle and we? break the internet
    Sorry to disappoint but quooks won't gush over anything other than a win.
    Disagree

    #script
    Sorta like the script in 2014 where UCLA was supposed to beat Oregon instead of Oregon rampaging through the conference, right?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • bananasnblondes
    bananasnblondes Member Posts: 15,641
    Willie is doing well with recruiting so far this year, but no better than Chip or Slingblade did in their time. Oregon wasn't going to go completely down the shitter because of one year, just like UW wasn't going to become every kid's dream school based on last year. These kids still grew up with Oregon being cool and UW being lame.

    That being said, Oregon has to win this year. If they are 3-6 at some point, their commits will start dropping like flies, especially the ones from Florida. With Nelson, Carrington, and Freeman gone next year, they will probably be looking at a major rebuild on offense next year as well. At the very least. They need a Sark year - 5-4 in conference with at least one big upset win.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter