Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Somebody needs to tell the 16 recruits in Oregon's #4 rated class

13

Comments

  • dfleadflea Member Posts: 7,278

    Sorry to disappoint but quooks won't gush over anything other than a win.
    Or a playoff loss.

    But still.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    So

    Oregon is BACK?

    I just didn't think it would happen so soon

    Admit it - you are just a little nervous that the shit show down there might not last as long as you were hoping.

    Oh well ... you'll? always have pretend elite academis.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    They can't coach.
    The cute Cuban can coach. He has Cane blood in his veins. Winning is inevitable.
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,827

    Admit it - you are just a little nervous that the shit show down there might not last as long as you were hoping.

    Oh well ... you'll? always have pretend elite academis.
    HR, YK

    Our? law school sucks!
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908
    edited June 2017


    Not saying that is the case at Oregon this year so don't twist. Just saying it looks familiar.
    I'd say a twist is in order here Race. You lying cunt.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    Nope the script has only ever called for UCLA to be soft and overrated.
    Not here. You must be knew. There are at least 4 guys on this bored who have actually given JMJr. an actual blowjob, because he has ties to DJ and noes how to be Husky tuff. One of said blow jobers is in this actual thread.

    He literally just poasted.

    So, no, not the consensus narrative. Not by a long shot.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    Dude brah, you were arguing with me about it in 2014 and insisted UCLA would beat the Ducks because the script said so.
    HRYN; I have pictures Race. Fuck off with your Trump Fake News twisting mother fucker.
  • backthepackbackthepack Member Posts: 19,933
    Creep the septule warrior!
  • GrundleStiltzkinGrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    Creep the septule warrior!

    You know it bitch.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908
    dnc said:

    HR, YK

    Our? law school sucks!
    Our? Your?
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908
    Swaye said:

    Lots of Faggerts for Taggert in this thread.

    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    that, as per Kim, "Oregon is really a mess right now". I'm sure once they hear that quote from the maestro they'll pretty much all want to jump ship.

    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908
    Gladstone said:

    sub .500 coach at multiple stops who had 1 quasi break out season and then bailed

    so he's ron zook

    oh no
    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,908

    PM to @creepycoug

    You don't want me to take the gloves off and roll


    At all

    Plus

    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.

    If we're just talking about handicapping some kid's odds of qualifying, I'm pretty sure you? don't have the only coach outside of Palo Alto who knows how to do it.

    Bring it. I'm feisty as fuck today my fren. And, consider,

    This is what I mean. You assume a lot of shit about Pete you probably don't quite know. Maybe it's because he looks and sounds like the kind of guy who has credibility to you. It doesn't mean shit when it comes to this business. You also assume a lot of shit about Willie, who just got to this conference 5 minutes ago. I have no experience, and I strongly suspect you don't either, to substantiate your "likely" scenarios.

    I also have a hard time believing that Pete somehow knows how to read the academic issues better than most of other Pac 12 coaches. Pete is not recruiting to Stanford. That is a different animal altogether. Quit trying to act like the situations are even remotely similar. Fuck you guys have a man-crush on this dude, and it's so fucking predictable. None of these arguments would be made if he weren't winning.

    If Pete needs someone and is convinced the kid is an elite talent, he'll go after him and make it work. If he chooses to not make it work, I would better guess it has to do with easier or better alternatives. I'm guessing the same is true at Oregon and with us? at WSU.

    There is a bigger academic profile difference between UW and UCLA than there is between UW and Oregon or WSU. If UCLA can get a dummy, UW can get a dummy.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Oregon is recruiting very well because they hired a bunch of great recruiters. All it is is sales, there are selling very well.

    We all new that they would cruit good. Question is can they coach? The sad part, pac-10 is so shitty that u just have to be mediocre coach to be decent.
Sign In or Register to comment.