President Snowflake
Comments
-
Race is dead on as usual.RaceBannon said:
Why would we ignore obvious corruption that went unpunished because there was no independent investigation to focus on an investigation that has nothing? It is very Germaine Jackson to point out the hypocrisy and the attempt to waylay a democratically elected president with a "resistance" centered around lies and an endless attempt to investigate nothing?jhfstyle24 said:
You're not wrong that Hillary is corrupt, a total shill, and likely didn't deserve to get off scot free. I hate her and the Democrats are dumb for whining about the Electoral college when they literally intentionally cleared the path for Hillary to win the primaries.RaceBannon said:Russiagate is a wholly manufactured non scandal hatched when Hillary lost that had been investigated since July with NO proof at all.
And if you didn't have a problem with the husband of a target of an investigation who is a former President meeting with the AG days before his wife was let off despite documented criminal activity then you lose your precious fake moral high ground and end up being just who Trump says you are.
Not to mention the Nixon strategy of using the IRS to attack opponents and spying on a rival campaign
I have no issue with a full investigation of it all including Podesta ties to Russia and all the rest.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
However, the election is over. Pointing fingers at Hillary doesn't mean jack shit anymore. Trump won. Get over it.
There isn't direct proof (like, evidence of Trump taking orders from Putin or something), but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, in my humble opinion. Unless, of course, you are one of the cultists that thinks anything negative about Trump is fake news.
If you are such a moral crusader for truth and justice you don't get to pick what you care about.
There is no proof. This started based off a fake document prepared by the Clinton campaign.
Trump has every right to defend himself against this -
That 5 Second Tweet keeps the twits hovering around their devices all day long until it sings and when it does just like Pavlov they bark in predictable fashion until the Bell goes off again with new barking ordersinsinceredawg said:
You call whining and complaining on Twitter like a spoiled little brat, "fighting"? Trump sounds like a petulant child who's never been told no or dealt with any adversity. Don't forget, your hero is a draft dodger who was too scared to go to Vietnam.RaceBannon said:
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it -
It's almost like you waiting around to gargle his balls.doogie said:
That 5 Second Tweet keeps the twits hovering around their devices all day long until it sings and when it does just like Pavlov they bark in predictable fashion until the Bell goes off again with new barking ordersinsinceredawg said:
You call whining and complaining on Twitter like a spoiled little brat, "fighting"? Trump sounds like a petulant child who's never been told no or dealt with any adversity. Don't forget, your hero is a draft dodger who was too scared to go to Vietnam.RaceBannon said:
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it -
It's cute that you're really trying to have a rational conversation with Race.jhfstyle24 said:
I think you are correct in saying we shouldn't ignore corruption. I already said that Hillary deserved at least more than she got. She wasn't innocent. Do I think she needs to go to jail? Hard to tell. My point was that it seems like you want to point fingers to prove that Trump isn't guilty, rather than him taking responsibility for his actions.RaceBannon said:
Why would we ignore obvious corruption that went unpunished because there was no independent investigation to focus on an investigation that has nothing? It is very Germaine Jackson to point out the hypocrisy and the attempt to waylay a democratically elected president with a "resistance" centered around lies and an endless attempt to investigate nothing?jhfstyle24 said:
You're not wrong that Hillary is corrupt, a total shill, and likely didn't deserve to get off scot free. I hate her and the Democrats are dumb for whining about the Electoral college when they literally intentionally cleared the path for Hillary to win the primaries.RaceBannon said:Russiagate is a wholly manufactured non scandal hatched when Hillary lost that had been investigated since July with NO proof at all.
And if you didn't have a problem with the husband of a target of an investigation who is a former President meeting with the AG days before his wife was let off despite documented criminal activity then you lose your precious fake moral high ground and end up being just who Trump says you are.
Not to mention the Nixon strategy of using the IRS to attack opponents and spying on a rival campaign
I have no issue with a full investigation of it all including Podesta ties to Russia and all the rest.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
However, the election is over. Pointing fingers at Hillary doesn't mean jack shit anymore. Trump won. Get over it.
There isn't direct proof (like, evidence of Trump taking orders from Putin or something), but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, in my humble opinion. Unless, of course, you are one of the cultists that thinks anything negative about Trump is fake news.
If you are such a moral crusader for truth and justice you don't get to pick what you care about.
There is no proof. This started based off a fake document prepared by the Clinton campaign.
Trump has every right to defend himself against this
However, I would like to point out that there were multiple investigations into Hillary's e-mails and into Benghazi. I don't think there was any point in the millions of tax dollars wasted, because although she was probably guilty, she didn't get in trouble. Was she a corrupt shill? Yes. Was she a national traitor? Probably not.
Like I said, there is no DIRECT proof. There is circumstantial evidence- like Trump firing Comey in the middle of an investigation into Russia- but no direct proof. Hence, there is an investigation to determine if there IS in fact direct proof, rather than the current circumstantial evidence. In this case, it is my personal belief that, like with Hillary, there is enough smoke that it is likely for there to be fire. This is a dude who is dumb enough to claim that he doesn't exercise because he thinks it will drain his energy and shorten his life span, when in fact the results are the exact opposite. Trump might actually be enough of a buffoon to leak confidential information. -
Glad we have a dhdawg and Hondo replacement. I saw their amount of Trump threads were going down rapidly.
-
Hillary did in fact send classified information via her private email server. She requested her aid Huma to remove classified headings from emails and to send them out. Her emails were also sent to Weiners computers. This is a federal felony. People go to jail for it. Comey gave her a pass.AZDuck said:
the media is not his problemRaceBannon said:Actually in America the reasonable assumption is innocent until proven guilty or at least until there is more than nothing but hot air by political opponents.
Trump can defend himself all he wants regardless of the birther thing or anything else. And he is going to.
If you can't see the difference in how the media treats him I can't help you.
I'm glad to hear that you want to give your guy the benefit of the doubt. Since innocence until proven guilty is important to you I'm sure you have always applied that standard to Hillary and Obama, right?
Their has been absolutely nothing in the way of evidence or findings of any kind indicating trump has done anything illegal. Nothing. The media is calling for impeachment. No double standards here!
-
Thanks for proving the meme correct!Sledog said:
Race is dead on as usual.RaceBannon said:
Why would we ignore obvious corruption that went unpunished because there was no independent investigation to focus on an investigation that has nothing? It is very Germaine Jackson to point out the hypocrisy and the attempt to waylay a democratically elected president with a "resistance" centered around lies and an endless attempt to investigate nothing?jhfstyle24 said:
You're not wrong that Hillary is corrupt, a total shill, and likely didn't deserve to get off scot free. I hate her and the Democrats are dumb for whining about the Electoral college when they literally intentionally cleared the path for Hillary to win the primaries.RaceBannon said:Russiagate is a wholly manufactured non scandal hatched when Hillary lost that had been investigated since July with NO proof at all.
And if you didn't have a problem with the husband of a target of an investigation who is a former President meeting with the AG days before his wife was let off despite documented criminal activity then you lose your precious fake moral high ground and end up being just who Trump says you are.
Not to mention the Nixon strategy of using the IRS to attack opponents and spying on a rival campaign
I have no issue with a full investigation of it all including Podesta ties to Russia and all the rest.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
However, the election is over. Pointing fingers at Hillary doesn't mean jack shit anymore. Trump won. Get over it.
There isn't direct proof (like, evidence of Trump taking orders from Putin or something), but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, in my humble opinion. Unless, of course, you are one of the cultists that thinks anything negative about Trump is fake news.
If you are such a moral crusader for truth and justice you don't get to pick what you care about.
There is no proof. This started based off a fake document prepared by the Clinton campaign.
Trump has every right to defend himself against this -
Forget to switch handles?Sledog said:
Thanks for proving the meme correct!Sledog said:
Race is dead on as usual.RaceBannon said:
Why would we ignore obvious corruption that went unpunished because there was no independent investigation to focus on an investigation that has nothing? It is very Germaine Jackson to point out the hypocrisy and the attempt to waylay a democratically elected president with a "resistance" centered around lies and an endless attempt to investigate nothing?jhfstyle24 said:
You're not wrong that Hillary is corrupt, a total shill, and likely didn't deserve to get off scot free. I hate her and the Democrats are dumb for whining about the Electoral college when they literally intentionally cleared the path for Hillary to win the primaries.RaceBannon said:Russiagate is a wholly manufactured non scandal hatched when Hillary lost that had been investigated since July with NO proof at all.
And if you didn't have a problem with the husband of a target of an investigation who is a former President meeting with the AG days before his wife was let off despite documented criminal activity then you lose your precious fake moral high ground and end up being just who Trump says you are.
Not to mention the Nixon strategy of using the IRS to attack opponents and spying on a rival campaign
I have no issue with a full investigation of it all including Podesta ties to Russia and all the rest.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
However, the election is over. Pointing fingers at Hillary doesn't mean jack shit anymore. Trump won. Get over it.
There isn't direct proof (like, evidence of Trump taking orders from Putin or something), but there is a lot of circumstantial evidence, in my humble opinion. Unless, of course, you are one of the cultists that thinks anything negative about Trump is fake news.
If you are such a moral crusader for truth and justice you don't get to pick what you care about.
There is no proof. This started based off a fake document prepared by the Clinton campaign.
Trump has every right to defend himself against this -
I'm inclined to side with Race on this.
Because he was there. -
No but Uganda would be acceptable,insinceredawg said:
How else do you explain why Trump supporters are perfectly content with him colluding with and allowing a foreign adversary to meddle in the campaign? Think this shit would fly if Russia was replaced with Nigeria?dnc said:
When you're struggling, cry racism.insinceredawg said:
Russians are white so it's okayYellowSnow said:Russiagate does not bother Race. Does your conscious bother you, tell me true?
*gurgle*
Only if they were White, male and Christian of course.
