Actually in America the reasonable assumption is innocent until proven guilty or at least until there is more than nothing but hot air by political opponents.
Trump can defend himself all he wants regardless of the birther thing or anything else. And he is going to.
If you can't see the difference in how the media treats him I can't help you.
the media is not his problem
I'm glad to hear that you want to give your guy the benefit of the doubt. Since innocence until proven guilty is important to you I'm sure you have always applied that standard to Hillary and Obama, right?
Hillary did in fact send classified information via her private email server. She requested her aid Huma to remove classified headings from emails and to send them out. Her emails were also sent to Weiners computers. This is a federal felony. People go to jail for it. Comey gave her a pass.
Their has been absolutely nothing in the way of evidence or findings of any kind indicating trump has done anything illegal. Nothing. The media is calling for impeachment. No double standards here!
Sending an email of a weiner could be a felony. Sending an email to Weiner isn't a felony.
Russiagate is a wholly manufactured non scandal hatched when Hillary lost that had been investigated since July with NO proof at all.
And if you didn't have a problem with the husband of a target of an investigation who is a former President meeting with the AG days before his wife was let off despite documented criminal activity then you lose your precious fake moral high ground and end up being just who Trump says you are.
Not to mention the Nixon strategy of using the IRS to attack opponents and spying on a rival campaign
I have no issue with a full investigation of it all including Podesta ties to Russia and all the rest.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
At least J's sarcastic defenses of Trump are funny.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
You call whining and complaining on Twitter like a spoiled little brat, "fighting"? Trump sounds like a petulant child who's never been told no or dealt with any adversity. Don't forget, your hero is a draft dodger who was too scared to go to Vietnam.
That 5 Second Tweet keeps the twits hovering around their devices all day long until it sings and when it does just like Pavlov they bark in predictable fashion until the Bell goes off again with new barking orders
It's almost like you waiting around to gargle his balls.
Look at who's who of self loathing fags who chinned this post.
The democrat scum (and republicans too) that bilked the country for the past 8 years just can't accept the fact that they lost not because of the Russians, but because they were out of touch, arrogant and incompetent. They have only themselves to blame. They should STFU and crawl back into their slime holes and never return.
Actually in America the reasonable assumption is innocent until proven guilty or at least until there is more than nothing but hot air by political opponents.
Trump can defend himself all he wants regardless of the birther thing or anything else. And he is going to.
If you can't see the difference in how the media treats him I can't help you.
the media is not his problem
I'm glad to hear that you want to give your guy the benefit of the doubt. Since innocence until proven guilty is important to you I'm sure you have always applied that standard to Hillary and Obama, right?
Hillary did in fact send classified information via her private email server. She requested her aid Huma to remove classified headings from emails and to send them out. Her emails were also sent to Weiners computers. This is a federal felony. People go to jail for it. Comey gave her a pass.
Their has been absolutely nothing in the way of evidence or findings of any kind indicating trump has done anything illegal. Nothing. The media is calling for impeachment. No double standards here!
When you've got Boobs and AZCuck WTF'ing your poasts, you know you're speaking the truth.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
You call whining and complaining on Twitter like a spoiled little brat, "fighting"? Trump sounds like a petulant child who's never been told no or dealt with any adversity. Don't forget, your hero is a draft dodger who was too scared to go to Vietnam.
That 5 Second Tweet keeps the twits hovering around their devices all day long until it sings and when it does just like Pavlov they bark in predictable fashion until the Bell goes off again with new barking orders
It's almost like you waiting around to gargle his balls.
Look at who's who of self loathing fags who chinned this post.
They all loathe you, not themselves, you ignant cunt.
Trump is not going to be a Bush here. He is going to fight. Deal with it
You call whining and complaining on Twitter like a spoiled little brat, "fighting"? Trump sounds like a petulant child who's never been told no or dealt with any adversity. Don't forget, your hero is a draft dodger who was too scared to go to Vietnam.
That 5 Second Tweet keeps the twits hovering around their devices all day long until it sings and when it does just like Pavlov they bark in predictable fashion until the Bell goes off again with new barking orders
It's almost like you waiting around to gargle his balls.
Look at who's who of self loathing fags who chinned this post.
They all loathe you, not themselves, you ignant cunt.
How did this Russia thing morph isn't to collusion or whatever
Wasn't the original thing that supposedly Russians showed some shady dnc emails
Now it's turned into them manipulating votes or who the fuck even knows
I think it was originally:
1. Russia hacked the DNC 2. Russian media bots spammed US with fake news during the election cycle
then
3. RUSSIANS!!!???
I'm almost totally sure 1 happened. 2 absolutely happened, but 3 is where we're at now. Nobody knows if Trump and associates colluded on 1 and 2, that remains to be seen. It would be stupid AF for Trump to ask Russia to keep hacking (as he did very publicly) if he was somehow colluding with them. Then again, I do think he's a megalomaniacal jackass who believes himself bulletproof and might be stupid enough to do just that.
That being said, it's clear that he and his associates like to talk to Russians a lot and it's clear that they try to hide it. Nobody knows what they talk about, and it could be the weather for all we know now, but they aren't doing themselves any favors under this level of scrutiny.
If there was no collusion, the conversations were truly innocent, and they all go down for obstruction and perjury when their hands were clean all along but they were from the gas-and-match school of crisis management, then el o fucking el.
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You're counting chickens and all I see at the moment are eggs.
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You're counting chickens and all I see at the moment are eggs.
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You're counting chickens and all I see at the moment are eggs.
What?
Comey perjuring and Trump obstructing are not mutually exclusive. You don't know that document doesn't exist.
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You're counting chickens and all I see at the moment are eggs.
What?
Comey perjuring and Trump obstructing are not mutually exclusive. You don't know that document doesn't exist.
I didn't say either way. I said accurately that it is a phantom read over the phone. Comey's testimony under oath is a matter of record. Was he lying then or is he lying in the alleged letter no one has seen?
I know that may seem irrational, but what can I say?
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
You're counting chickens and all I see at the moment are eggs.
What?
Comey perjuring and Trump obstructing are not mutually exclusive. You don't know that document doesn't exist.
I didn't say either way. I said accurately that it is a phantom read over the phone. Comey's testimony under oath is a matter of record. Was he lying then or is he lying in the alleged letter no one has seen?
I know that may seem irrational, but what can I say?
Seems like a lot of machinations for a phantom. Are you sure you know more than the senate? Your second poont stands, although Trump hasn't exactly soothed anyone's fears about his honesty.
Losers lose, and when they lose they need someone to blame. It must be the reds, they are the reason we are incompetent chimps and got stripped of power....
Comments
HTH
Wasn't the original thing that supposedly Russians showed some shady dnc emails
Now it's turned into them manipulating votes or who the fuck even knows
1. Russia hacked the DNC
2. Russian media bots spammed US with fake news during the election cycle
then
3. RUSSIANS!!!???
I'm almost totally sure 1 happened. 2 absolutely happened, but 3 is where we're at now. Nobody knows if Trump and associates colluded on 1 and 2, that remains to be seen. It would be stupid AF for Trump to ask Russia to keep hacking (as he did very publicly) if he was somehow colluding with them. Then again, I do think he's a megalomaniacal jackass who believes himself bulletproof and might be stupid enough to do just that.
That being said, it's clear that he and his associates like to talk to Russians a lot and it's clear that they try to hide it. Nobody knows what they talk about, and it could be the weather for all we know now, but they aren't doing themselves any favors under this level of scrutiny.
If there was no collusion, the conversations were truly innocent, and they all go down for obstruction and perjury when their hands were clean all along but they were from the gas-and-match school of crisis management, then el o fucking el.
Again
By the way you only need to look at the words of the revered and saintly James Comey to understand how HIllary broke the law.
The same Comey who testified under oath on May 3 that no one including Trump put any pressure on him. Now that pales to an invisible document read over the phone to the NY Times but it does bring perjury in to play. Again
By all means continue with your very rational Trump Derangement Syndrome.
What?
I know that may seem irrational, but what can I say?