Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Dylan Morris, 4* 2019 QB, Graham (Graham-Kapowsin), WA (COMMITTED)
Comments
-
Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our offense was Jack Pardee bullshit. We plowed bad teams and scored 7-10 points against good teams.Passion said:
Disagree. Smith's area of the team put up big numbers and he produced the 6th place vote-getter for the Heisman.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Disagree: Sirmon was Pete, Yankoff was Lubick and this was Pete.dnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
The only one that wasn't a chip in was Yankoff and that was all Lubick/Pete.
If we pull Tanner McKee and he cites Smith, then we can talk.
Babushka helps, though admittedly he may need Pete of Lubick to seal the deal. Malloe just needs to go away.
I've said it a million times, if you give up 45 points in critical games, but only 10 against bad offenses you are not a good defense.
If you score 50+ against shit teams and 7 against a good one, you are not a good offense.
We have a better team than everyone. That's why we scored. Our offense is dreck against similar competition.
Holy shit.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Our offense was Jack Pardee bullshit. We plowed bad teams and scored 7-10 points against good teams.Passion said:
Disagree. Smith's area of the team put up big numbers and he produced the 6th place vote-getter for the Heisman.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Disagree: Sirmon was Pete, Yankoff was Lubick and this was Pete.dnc said:@Babushka officially moves out of the shit tier recruiters with this one. That's three 4 star QB's in two classes. Yeah two of them are in state and one of them came because of Lubick, but scorebored is all that matters. Smiff's scorebored looks pretty good of late. Especially given the RISE concerns.
Not saying he's Lubick or Lake, don't twist. But he's at least in the Bonerpoppa/PaoPao tier as opposed to the Malloe/Strausser tier where he was before.
Incremental progress and chit.
The only one that wasn't a chip in was Yankoff and that was all Lubick/Pete.
If we pull Tanner McKee and he cites Smith, then we can talk.
Babushka helps, though admittedly he may need Pete of Lubick to seal the deal. Malloe just needs to go away.
I've said it a million times, if you give up 45 points in critical games, but only 10 against bad offenses you are not a good defense.
If you score 50+ against shit teams and 7 against a good one, you are not a good offense.
We have a better team than everyone. That's why we scored. Our offense is dreck against similar competition.
Stop.
If we had lost to Stanford they'd have been "similar competition". We waxed them so nobody thinks of them that way.
If we'd have rolled USC they wouldn't be considered similar competition. But they kicked our ass so you place them there.
Stanford was a critical game. Colorado was a critical game. Fuck, WSU was a critical game (yes we had a talent advantage in it). The offense showed up to varying ass kicking degrees in each of them.
They were at a decent talent disadvantage to USC's defense and underachieved. They were at a massive talent disadvantage to Bama's defense and performed about as expected. They didn't have issues with not showing up in critical games. They had issues with not scoring points when they played defenses that had more talent than they did.
That's why we want 5-7 elite guys a year, isn't it? Because SC and Bama are getting 10-12 of them every year, and we need more of them in order to beat those teams consistently. -
To me, it's difficult to really judge the USC and Alabama games because the passing game was so limited by Browning's shoulder ... we got away with it against Colorado because we were able to just run the ball down their throats.
The most relevant game we can look back to in 2016 was Stanford and even then there's a bit of an issue because Stanford was missing their starting CBs in the game.
But there were throws made in that game with respect to outs, etc. that I'm not sure it would have mattered and showed what our offense was capable of with Browning at full strength with his arm.
By all of the metrics that I materially track each team against each other in the conference (9 each on offense/defense), UW comparatively to the conference ranked in the top 2 (conference games only) offensively in 7 of the 9 categories (those other categories were 4th in yards per rush and 6th in completion %) and in the top 2 in 6 of 9 defensive categories (no lower than 4th in any single category).
The consensus is that Browning's shoulder injury took place at some point in the Oregon State game. In the 6 games prior to Oregon St, Browning was 112 for 154 for a 72.7% completion percentage (it wasn't built up just in the non-conference schedule as he was 72.9% in the 1st 3 conference games). In his first 6 games, his lowest completion % for any single game was 63.6% against Portland State. In the Oregon State game, Browning was 15 for 31 for a completion % of 48.4%. After the Oregon State game, for the remaining 5 conference games + P12 title game + National Semifinal Browning's completion % dropped to 57% and really only had strong games against Cal and the Cougs.
Finally, the area where you can really tell that Browning's shoulder was limiting on offense was that his lack of arm strength didn't allow him to push the ball effectively down the field. This resulted in significant drops in his yards per attempt and yards per completion in the 2nd half of the season compared to the 1st half (Cal and Cougs as the outliers).
-
No one actually read the last three posts right?
-
I read them and promptly forgot them.Edwin_Bambino said:No one actually read the last three posts right?
-
bananasnblondes said:
I will give props to Smith where they are due. He looks like he's actually gotten a normal fucking haircut, is not slouching horribly, and could pass for a football coach.GrundleStiltzkin said:
-
Truth.kh83 said:
I read them and promptly forgot them.Edwin_Bambino said:No one actually read the last three posts right?
But still, hurtful. -
stopped readingTequilla said:To me, it's difficult to really judge the USC and Alabama games because the passing game was so limited by Browning's shoulder ...
-
It's easy to spot the ones who did.Edwin_Bambino said:No one actually read the last three posts right?
-
I am hearing "we" won 12 games last season and made the CFP in only year 3 of Pete WITHOUT any black OL.
-
I'm pretty sure Nick Harris is black, although I'm pretty sure Andrew Kirkland is not.BleachedAnusDawg said:I am hearing "we" won 12 games last season and made the CFP in only year 3 of Pete WITHOUT any black OL.
