Congratulations to all those who

PurpleThrobber

ThomasFremont said:

He's my neighbor.

Wait...he's the guy whose fence you jumped after getting caught fucking his daughter?!?!

Wow.

Ballsy. Kudos.

TurdBomber

BearsWiin said:

have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution



BIG BALLS BOB

Is he cross-eyed? Or what's going on there?

dhdawg

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

BearsWiin

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

Pretty easy to tear the EO apart if the court uses any heightened scrutiny, but on rational basis alone the feds stand a good chance of prevailing if for no other reason than the onus being on the WA AG to show no rational basis behind the EO.

Dude61

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

2001400ex

Dude61 said:

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.

So a wall is a solution without a problem.

doogie

Then why are you in perpetual menstruation over immigration?

2001400ex

doogie said:

Then why are you in perpetual menstruation over immigration?

Me? I just said the Muslim ban is a joke. And the constitutional judges agree.

HTH

Dude61

2001400ex said:

Dude61 said:

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.

So a wall is a solution without a problem.

My post concerned the cost to taxpayers, not the number of people entering or exiting the country. If you have a study showing that tax revenue the US receives from illegal immigration exceeding the cost, I would consider that.

2001400ex

Dude61 said:

2001400ex said:

Dude61 said:

dhdawg said:

PostGameOrangeSlices said:

Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own

Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"

FWIW I think this may get overturned

I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.

You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.

So a wall is a solution without a problem.

My post concerned the cost to taxpayers, not the number of people entering or exiting the country. If you have a study showing that tax revenue the US receives from illegal immigration exceeding the cost, I would consider that.

So you are saying you want to keep the illegals in with a wall then?