Congratulations to all those who
Comments
-
What is the net migration of Central Americans that come through Mexico HondoFS?2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem.
You realize illegals get billions in public assistance right?2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
By VERY conservative measure...
SNAP:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poor-illegal-immigrants-get-food-stamps-denied-to-poor-u.s.-citizens-2-billion-worth/article/2596115
Medicaid:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/how-undocumented-immigrants-sometimes-receive-medicaid-treatment/
And yes, those are just two small measured amounts...as somebody referenced before it has been reported to be as high as $113 billion a year, and no body can argue with the fact that govt money is spent. And yes...a lot of it is at the state and local level where they are footing the bill for teachers trying to get kids who don't speak English caught up in school, etc.
http://www.fairus.org/docserver/uscoststudy_2010.pdf
And another part that is always ignored is the stupid money the Feds pay back to illegal immigrants in Earned Income Tax Credit...
http://freebeacon.com/issues/illegal-immigrants-eligible-for-up-to-eight-refundable-tax-credits/
And another side question...why is it every Liberal hero like this idiotic Washington AG look like they have a soft skull and can get beat up by a 10 year old? You think probability would kick in and they would have at least 1 normal guy step forward but nope...
-
It's almost like you are only telling part of the story.HoustonHusky said:
What is the net migration of Central Americans that come through Mexico HondoFS?2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem.
You realize illegals get billions in public assistance right?2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
By VERY conservative measure...
SNAP:
http://www.washingtonexaminer.com/poor-illegal-immigrants-get-food-stamps-denied-to-poor-u.s.-citizens-2-billion-worth/article/2596115
Medicaid:
http://www.pbs.org/newshour/rundown/how-undocumented-immigrants-sometimes-receive-medicaid-treatment/
And yes, those are just two small measured amounts...as somebody referenced before it has been reported to be as high as $113 billion a year, and no body can argue with the fact that govt money is spent. And yes...a lot of it is at the state and local level where they are footing the bill for teachers trying to get kids who don't speak English caught up in school, etc.
http://www.fairus.org/docserver/uscoststudy_2010.pdf
And another part that is always ignored is the stupid money the Feds pay back to illegal immigrants in Earned Income Tax Credit...
http://freebeacon.com/issues/illegal-immigrants-eligible-for-up-to-eight-refundable-tax-credits/
And another side question...why is it every Liberal hero like this idiotic Washington AG look like they have a soft skull and can get beat up by a 10 year old? You think probability would kick in and they would have at least 1 normal guy step forward but nope...
Based on an audit by the Treasury Inspector General, the claim leaves out some context. Trump conflates "illegal immigrants" with "unauthorized workers," a group composed largely of undocumented immigrants but also legal immigrants and others. The $4.2 billion refers to the amount given in tax credit refunds for children, the large majority of whom are U.S. citizens. And the actual year is 2009, not 2011 (that was the year the report was published).
Also, it's important to note that illegal immigrants pay an estimated $12 billion in payroll taxes to Social Security and don't receive benefits. So Trump is leaving out a significant part of the picture when it comes to taxes and undocumented workers.
http://www.politifact.com/truth-o-meter/statements/2015/aug/18/donald-trump/trump-illegal-immigrants-four-two-billion/ -
What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation
-
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
Zero hedge. lol. Fuck off you Texas sodomite.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
2001400ex said:
@61blowjobs:
Since I'm a nice guy, I'll provide you some education so you don't look more like a dumbfuck.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/immigration-myths/
ZeroHedge > CNN2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
Read facts. You can research many different websites.Dude61 said:2001400ex said:@61blowjobs:
Since I'm a nice guy, I'll provide you some education so you don't look more like a dumbfuck.
http://money.cnn.com/2014/11/20/news/economy/immigration-myths/
ZeroHedge > CNN2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
CirrhosisDawg said:
Suck it Coker and nacho lover. Bishop Blanchet class of 1983!BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB
Go Braves!CirrhosisDawg said:
Suck it Coker and nacho lover. Bishop Blanchet class of 1983!BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
I'm reporting that @HoustonHusky is retarded.
-
So zerohedge lied when it directly quoted Politifact on both Bernie Sanders and Trump? Free free to correct their quotes if they are wrong...and if not feel free to go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
Great. Another Pro-Life Catholic.CirrhosisDawg said:
Suck it Coker and nacho lover. Bishop Blanchet class of 1983!BearsWiin said:have an Attorney General who understnads and respects the Constitution
BIG BALLS BOB -
You are reading a website that just makes shit up. Complain because another website gave Bernie a mostly true and Trump a mostly false. But thoroughly explained what it did and zero hedge never disputed the facts.HoustonHusky said:
So zerohedge lied when it directly quoted Politifact on both Bernie Sanders and Trump? Free free to correct their quotes if they are wrong...and if not feel free to go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation
Are you that dumb or trolling for a response? -
Sounds grand for somebody with a speed limit IQ such as you, but you apparently went and fucked off because you didn't (and can't) specify which of the direct quotes from Politi(non)fact is not true. The same claim from 2 different candidates, yet completely different conclusions from the trash website. There are entire websites and tons of examples of the bias of Politifact, but reading and thinking is apparently hard for someone with a speed limit IQ such as yourself.2001400ex said:
You are reading a website that just makes shit up. Complain because another website gave Bernie a mostly true and Trump a mostly false. But thoroughly explained what it did and zero hedge never disputed the facts.HoustonHusky said:
So zerohedge lied when it directly quoted Politifact on both Bernie Sanders and Trump? Free free to correct their quotes if they are wrong...and if not feel free to go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation
Are you that dumb or trolling for a response?
So, again, feel free to actually correct the quotes if they are wrong, and if they aren't then go fuck yourself.
-
Thread going downhill quickly. Please nuke from orbit.
-
I do like it when a dude cries about being labeled a denier then throws out the speed limit IQ. But then can't even read the politifact articles. First, Bernie responded with exactly how they got to the number, Trump didn't. And they were a year apart. And you and zero hedge didn't refute the facts.HoustonHusky said:
Sounds grand for somebody with a speed limit IQ such as you, but you apparently went and fucked off because you didn't (and can't) specify which of the direct quotes from Politi(non)fact is not true. The same claim from 2 different candidates, yet completely different conclusions from the trash website. There are entire websites and tons of examples of the bias of Politifact, but reading and thinking is apparently hard for someone with a speed limit IQ such as yourself.2001400ex said:
You are reading a website that just makes shit up. Complain because another website gave Bernie a mostly true and Trump a mostly false. But thoroughly explained what it did and zero hedge never disputed the facts.HoustonHusky said:
So zerohedge lied when it directly quoted Politifact on both Bernie Sanders and Trump? Free free to correct their quotes if they are wrong...and if not feel free to go fuck yourself.2001400ex said:
Right. Did you even read the zero hedge article? Zero hedge complaining about fake news is laughable.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation
Are you that dumb or trolling for a response?
So, again, feel free to actually correct the quotes if they are wrong, and if they aren't then go fuck yourself.
You are distracting from the point that illegal immigrants are net contributors to the federal government. You haven't refuted one thing from the politifact article. And if you don't like their article, there's many more that have the exact same thing if you open your mind beyond brietbart, UK tabloids, and zero hedge. -
Your point is wrong on its face. Keep defending stupid. It's what you like to do.
-
Right. Nice factual well thought out post as always.doogie said:Your point is wrong on its face. Keep defending stupid. It's what you like to do.
-
Factual and concise. It's what I like to do.
-
All I need is anecdotal evidence. And a quick walk out the door to frequent any shitty business tells me there are tons of illegals here.
Hth -
Engrish please.Pitchfork51 said:All I need is anecdotal evidence. And a quick walk out the door to frequent any shitty business tells me there are tons of illegals here.
Hth -
doogie said:
I'm just happy Refugees who end up in Seattle get to
liveblow up the Brand New "affordable housing" projects all around the city. -
Only Hondo.2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem. -
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/08/jorge-ramos/ramos-40-undocumented-immigrants-come-air/salemcoog said:
Only Hondo.2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem.
If you don't like the source, Google it. Even Marco Rubio agrees. -
You are such a useful pawn. The benefits begin when the illegal mama starts squirting out the anchor babies. Food stamps, Healthcare, Housing vouchers are all available. Salem has been overrun with illegals who have had their anchor babies here and its a pretty common sight to see an illegal family fill up 2 grocery carts and pay with an EBT, snap, Oregon Trail or whatever you want to call it card and load them up in a late model Escalade or Tahoe.2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
And they have flooded our schools with the anchor babies. The youngest ones don't speak Engrish due to their parents not needing to ever learn Engrish themselves. This slows down the whole learning process for those that do speak Engrish and consequently Oregons schools are amongst the worse performing due in no small part to this fact.
There also is a ton of abuse in the program to boot.
-
Is it February yet???CirrhosisDawg said:
Zero hedge. lol. Fuck off you Texas sodomite.HoustonHusky said:What the hell are you talking about? You said "illegals don't get public assistance already". That is fucking stupid lie by any and all measures.
And linking to Politifact as a rebuttal to anything I (didn't) type is just comical...as if they aren't biased or anything. One of many examples...
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2016-09-25/politifact-apparently-even-facts-are-subjective-and-based-party-affiliation -
It's always special to watch useful idiots be played.2001400ex said:
http://www.politifact.com/punditfact/statements/2015/sep/08/jorge-ramos/ramos-40-undocumented-immigrants-come-air/salemcoog said:
Only Hondo.2001400ex said:
You do realize there's been basically a net migration by Mexicans out of America, right? Not to mention about half of illegal immigrants actually enter the country legally.Dude61 said:
I read a study by FAIR that estimated the total burden on taxpayers in 2013 for illegal immigration exceeded $113 billion. The burden on Washington State in 2013 was $1.4 billion. A $15 billion investment in a wall has a quick payback. ONTH, there are other, cheaper ways to break the will of anyone wanting to cross the border illegally, and forcing those here illegally to leave.dhdawg said:
Until we scrap this idea of a worthless 15 billion dollar border wall I don't want to hear about anything "wasting taxpayer money"PostGameOrangeSlices said:Really? To me, it seems like a waste of time and taxpayer money, but to each their own
FWIW I think this may get overturned
So a wall is a solution without a problem.
If you don't like the source, Google it. Even Marco Rubio agrees. -
STFU. You've never seen that once unless you are a regular panhandler. It's awesome watching you say you see that regularly while calling me a useful pawn. In the same paragraph even.salemcoog said:
You are such a useful pawn. The benefits begin when the illegal mama starts squirting out the anchor babies. Food stamps, Healthcare, Housing vouchers are all available. Salem has been overrun with illegals who have had their anchor babies here and its a pretty common sight to see an illegal family fill up 2 grocery carts and pay with an EBT, snap, Oregon Trail or whatever you want to call it card and load them up in a late model Escalade or Tahoe.2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
And they have flooded our schools with the anchor babies. The youngest ones don't speak Engrish due to their parents not needing to ever learn Engrish themselves. This slows down the whole learning process for those that do speak Engrish and consequently Oregons schools are amongst the worse performing due in no small part to this fact.
There also is a ton of abuse in the program to boot. -
Unfortunately I see it just about everytime I shop at Winco. So its witnessed fact. Not a Hondo cut n paste from Wikipedia or a hack website. You should leave the basement every now and then.2001400ex said:
STFU. You've never seen that once unless you are a regular panhandler. It's awesome watching you say you see that regularly while calling me a useful pawn. In the same paragraph even.salemcoog said:
You are such a useful pawn. The benefits begin when the illegal mama starts squirting out the anchor babies. Food stamps, Healthcare, Housing vouchers are all available. Salem has been overrun with illegals who have had their anchor babies here and its a pretty common sight to see an illegal family fill up 2 grocery carts and pay with an EBT, snap, Oregon Trail or whatever you want to call it card and load them up in a late model Escalade or Tahoe.2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
And they have flooded our schools with the anchor babies. The youngest ones don't speak Engrish due to their parents not needing to ever learn Engrish themselves. This slows down the whole learning process for those that do speak Engrish and consequently Oregons schools are amongst the worse performing due in no small part to this fact.
There also is a ton of abuse in the program to boot.
Or DIAFF. -
Take a picture next time at WinCo. Or STFU.salemcoog said:
Unfortunately I see it just about everytime I shop at Winco. So its witnessed fact. Not a Hondo cut n paste from Wikipedia or a hack website. You should leave the basement every now and then.2001400ex said:
STFU. You've never seen that once unless you are a regular panhandler. It's awesome watching you say you see that regularly while calling me a useful pawn. In the same paragraph even.salemcoog said:
You are such a useful pawn. The benefits begin when the illegal mama starts squirting out the anchor babies. Food stamps, Healthcare, Housing vouchers are all available. Salem has been overrun with illegals who have had their anchor babies here and its a pretty common sight to see an illegal family fill up 2 grocery carts and pay with an EBT, snap, Oregon Trail or whatever you want to call it card and load them up in a late model Escalade or Tahoe.2001400ex said:
You do realize illegals don't get public assistance already. And one of the contributing factors to less illegal immigration is that Bush and Obama have increased security, border patrol, and deportations the last 15 years.Dude61 said:
Other options:dnc said:I feel dirty but I'm with the bored libs here. The wall is going to be massively ineffective. It won't solve people overstaying their visas, it won't solve the millions who are already here (and will likely encourage a surge of those coming/decrease of those returning south before it is in place), and it won't solve the tunnels.
It's a massively expensive partial solution. To me it's not close to worth it.
Repeal the anchor baby law.
Cut off all public assistance to illegals.
Punish companies that employ illegals. (Canada has some tough laws in this regard}
Develop a temporary work visa to allow migrant workers.
Less Humanitarian option:
Deploy state National Guards to border and give a two week notice. Shoot on sight anyone trying to cross illegally.
It's almost like you don't understand reality.
And they have flooded our schools with the anchor babies. The youngest ones don't speak Engrish due to their parents not needing to ever learn Engrish themselves. This slows down the whole learning process for those that do speak Engrish and consequently Oregons schools are amongst the worse performing due in no small part to this fact.
There also is a ton of abuse in the program to boot.
Or DIAFF.
