Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

What is your grade for this recruiting class?

12467…10

Comments

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    B
    Gotta go B. Would've gone B+, but the QB discussion of late elevated my concerns about that recruiting under Smiff, whom I hate with the heat of a thousand suns.
    That, and only getting 1 of 10 of the linemen we wanted, kicks it down from what could've been an A- with another OL pickup.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Tequilla
    Tequilla Member Posts: 20,232
    B+
    We are very lucky that this was such a good year on the West Coast on the OL that we were able to fall back onto a couple of guys that have the ability to get to the elite level with the right development. Of course, we got there because we were literally 1 for 10 on our top OL targets ... which is abysmal.

    My problem with losing Marlon was the fact that we thought it was a good idea to only have 1 DL prospect in the class. That's BS. It should have been known or knowable that we were going to lose at least 2 DL this year with somebody leaving early. If Vita would have left we'd literally have been in a position for this recruiting class where Malloe was stuck holding his dick.

    That said, this is a very good class. Pepsi has made a great point about the fact that we're now stacking recruiting classes ... this is a very, very good sign.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LebamDawg
    LebamDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 8,844 Swaye's Wigwam
    B+
    all depends on the grading system. only the very best (Bama, Buckeyes, Georgia this year) get the A+, next 7-8 get the A's and so on. I prefer to rank the class by average points per signee - UW is 18th which gets them to the B+ range. But what the fuck do I know...
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HHBruh
    HHBruh Member Posts: 515
    B+
    Mad_Son said:

    It's all over, so what do you give as the final grade for this class?

    81% still adds up to B+
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • HFNY
    HFNY Member Posts: 5,529
    B+
    Exactly what I was thinking.
    LebamDawg said:

    all depends on the grading system. only the very best (Bama, Buckeyes, Georgia this year) get the A+, next 7-8 get the A's and so on. I prefer to rank the class by average points per signee - UW is 18th which gets them to the B+ range. But what the fuck do I know...

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • DawgFader
    DawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    edited February 2017
    B-
    FremontTroll said:

    Bread said:

    D = Dawg.
    All recruits are Dawgs now.


    At least this is what Ruth claims. worth the 9.95 this month?

    Naw, everyone knows "the D word" is Dynasty.
    Can someone please let the Dirt Dawgs down gently?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Mad_Son
    Mad_Son Member Posts: 10,194
    A-
    HHBruh said:

    Mad_Son said:

    It's all over, so what do you give as the final grade for this class?

    81% still adds up to B+
    That's some extreme grade inflation there. While I love 81% as much as the next guy that is a B- in my books.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • IPukeOregonGrellow
    IPukeOregonGrellow Member Posts: 2,183
    edited February 2017
    I'd give both Oregon and UW's classes a LIPO grade.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • KobeStan
    KobeStan Member Posts: 91
    B+ would of been an A with Marlon.

    Ty Hunter and Ahmed represent the absolute elite at their positions nationally.

    UW will NEVER recruit like Alabama or Ohio State.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter