Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Foster Sarell to UW: Yes or No?

15678911»

Comments

  • NeGgaPlEaSeNeGgaPlEaSe Member Posts: 5,729

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    Also strange we had a QB who actually tossed the rock around
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Let the OL will be terrible forever meltdown ensue.

    Let the CuntWaffle strawman defense ensue.
    Our o line being significantly improved is straw man?
    Implying that anyone is arguing our OL was terrible this year or will terrible in the future is a strawman you obtuse motherfucker.
    I'll get mad at the O Line when it stops being good you perpendicular motherfucker.
    Set your alarm for 2018 or 2019- whenever Adams and McGary leave.

    At this point it is highly unlikely we will be able to replace them without a big dropoff. Even @GrandpaSankey can see that.
    So you've already written off all our RS-SO, RS-FR, and incoming guys as busts?
    We got shit ton of guards, in the pipeline but no many true tackles. Hilbers and burleson are the only ones i can think of
    Yes exactly.
    I hope Trey Adams stay for his 4th year, but he is such a stud he most likely be gone after next year.
  • DawgFaderDawgFader Member Posts: 1,414
    edited January 2017
    The recruiting lately is good (Top 30ish). It's now moving towards great (Top 15), and probably gonna be even better moving forward.

    It's the collective group and balance of the class as a whole Petersen's after. Salvon Ahmed could end up being Corey Dillon good (Pumped about this guy) while another kid like a Brandon Beavers that Sark and Heyward were nutting over doesn't hit the second floor, let alone his ceiling.

    Why we would get Foster...As for our Oline, it was good enough to win the PAC12 this year. Foster would really help our lines competitiveness take that next step.

    Why we would miss on him...No excuse, missing on a Foster quality kid (once every 5 years type: Bannon Garrnett, Decastro etc...), is just as unacceptable today as it was then.

    All WA STATE kids we offer should be no brainer's and how it's not is perplexing? It's called pride. If Foster doesn't go to the UW he never bought in and thats sad. Most kids that play football west of the Mountains grew up dreaming of playing for UW (* except for the last 10 years). Getting the kids dreaming again is Petersen's job and I'm betting his philosophy is going to pay off huge.

    Side note...this class is trying to add to Henry Bainivalu, who is really good. A Foster, Jackson, Davis quality kid would put this Oline Class right where UW needs it to be, year in and year out. The games are dictated in the trenches and UW can't afford to miss on a Foster EVER.

    The program should expect 4* or better across the board with sprinkles of Ty Jones 3*'s from here on out.
  • CuntWaffleCuntWaffle Member Posts: 22,499

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    That's kind of like the its snowing out so there is no global warming
    Climate change*
  • FremontTrollFremontTroll Member Posts: 4,744

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    Also strange we had a QB who actually tossed the rock around
    I don't follow.

    Jones, Bynum, and Cook committed long before the season started.
  • GaryFromTeenMomGaryFromTeenMom Member Posts: 1,370
    edited January 2017
    Well fuck....Stanford dickheads are way out there.

    http://thecardboard.org/board/index.php?topic=14561.105

    "Not just any writer. Ruth Robbins, who is sort of a legendary Huskies message board publisher and recruiting news reporter. If she can be a homer, she will. So if RR is saying Sarell to Stanford, it's pretty much a lock."

    lol.
  • FireCohenFireCohen Member Posts: 21,823

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    Also strange we had a QB who actually tossed the rock around
    I don't follow.

    Jones, Bynum, and Cook committed long before the season started.
    They committed because of Jacob Sirmon!
  • PassionPassion Member Posts: 4,622

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    That's kind of like the its snowing out so there is no global warming argument

    Who are you...and what have you done with Race Bannon?
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 105,779 Founders Club
    Passion said:

    Petersen is the closer and responsible for recruiting. Blaming the assistant who is turning these horrible recruits into pac 12 champions is retarded

    Strange that recruiting at OL and WR lagged behind all the other positions. We got a new WR coach and immediately landed three studs for 2017. Strange.

    Now Strausser is a way better coach than Pease was but assuming we miss out on Jackson and Davis then Petersen needs to make some changes in how his staff recruits OL.

    It goes without saying that Petersen is ultimately responsible but it is more useful to pinpoint your criticism to the specific part of the program that is potentially deficient.
    That's kind of like the its snowing out so there is no global warming argument

    Who are you...and what have you done with Race Bannon?
    This isn't the tug so I'll just say my arguments often contain more nuance than they are given credit for
Sign In or Register to comment.