Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Elon Musk is a fraud...

1468910

Comments

  • OZONE
    OZONE Member Posts: 2,510

    Ozone gives me credit for every saying

    Not every saying. Just the ones that have become worn out cliches used by your minions.

  • TurdBomber
    TurdBomber Member Posts: 20,051 Standard Supporter
    OZONE. Pressing badly. Every thread.
    And pressing harder. Every post.
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,763

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
  • 2001400ex
    2001400ex Member Posts: 29,457
    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    *Sound
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279
    edited September 2016

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
  • BallSacked
    BallSacked Member Posts: 3,279

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
    Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,456 Founders Club

    PurpleJ said:

    2001400ex said:

    Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

    http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

    PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

    Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

    Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

    Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

    Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

    FS...

    The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.
    How did that work out you powder blue faggot?
    Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

    Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.
    If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

    the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC
    That didn't sail over my head Race, you pathetic fat real estate failure. the point i was responding too was that the government should charge VC interest rates (because he read something on zero hedge that said so).

    No go grab your carpet laying box. Fag.
    You seem angry.
    And stupid
    You mean like bankrupting myself by failing at real estate? That kind of stupid?
    No. You're wrong


    And stupid
    Liar and a Failure. Really set the world on fire there, huh Race?
    Yes I have as a matter of fact. Thank you for noticing