Elon Musk is a fraud...

BallSacked

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

RaceBannon

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

PurpleJ

money.cnn.com/2016/05/04/news/companies/tesla-earnings/

Not only was it morally wrong for them to take money that didn't belong to them in the first place and lend it without permission, it didn't work.

I have a better solution for resource scarcity. People like ballbag, hondo and OZONE should kill themselves. With AR-15s. Make the world a better place.

BallSacked

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.

RaceBannon

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.

If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC

doogie

Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?

2001400ex

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.

If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC

Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.

RaceBannon

doogie said:

Shouldn't efficiency drive investment decisions instead of political contributions to gain interest rates/terms favorable to the political donor?

Yes but as I pointed out, ballfag doesn't get it.



At all

doogie

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.

If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC

Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.

No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.

2001400ex

doogie said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

RaceBannon said:

BallSacked said:

HoustonHusky said:

2001400ex said:

Yet Tesla paid off the government loan 9 years early. I'm sure you had some whacked out conservative bullshit point. But no one else but Race sees what it is.

http://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2013-05-22/tesla-pays-off-its-465-million-loser-loan

PS: Race doesn't really understand anything, he just chimes in to call "liberals" ignorant.

Thank you for displaying your ignorance on the matter by not getting the point.

Its isn't that they paid it off (by issuing more stock I'm sure...)...the point is they were given a loan by the govt (not by Musk) as if they were an iron-clad safe investment and not a high-risk venture, so the govt had almost no chance to make money while they had every chance to lose. Just like they did with billions of $$ lost in green energy bankruptcies so far.

Only HondoFS would think it makes sense for the govt to make 2.6% on the same investment Musk made 3,600% (in part by leveraging the almost free money off of the govt)...

Add to the fact Elon has taken an estimated $5 billion from the govt to prop up his businesses, and that with that money he's been able to survive with this cool feature CNBC and NYU have been touting recently...its called cash burn.

FS...

The point of the program was to give below market financing to help influence investment in the industry, not earn a return for the taxpayer. You fucking fat Texan idiot.

How did that work out you powder blue faggot?

Well you purple pansy, not well. But that's not the point...houstontequilla feels the biggest issue is not charging market rates when it wasn't meant to in the first place.

Stay out of finance topics race, your bankruptcy failures prove you're clueless here.

If I had any bankruptcies I could run for President.

the point Houston made that sailed over your head like a Rosen pass into the arms of an A&M defender is that the government has no place in picking winners especially when they back losers. Your original sophomoric yet cliched reply indicated your lack of though on the issue. Typical Bruin who couldn't get into USC

Houston's point went out the window when Tesla paid the government back in full 9 years early.

Not to mention his point was FS to begin with.

No. And thanks for reminding us once again, his salient point sailed right over your head.

Like Race,, all you got is the 2nd grade answer of. "No you are wrong. Cause I said so, that's why".