Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2016 team record!!!

Baseman

8-5

H_D said:

Baseman said:

H_D said:

RaceBannon said:

ThomasFremont said:

I'm gonna need to see a natty.

Also what they do:


Which usually results in:

I'm a team guy so...

Somebody has got to jump on that grenade.

I'll thank myself for my service.

section_332

15-0 or 1-loss or whatever unrealistic expectations you have

We got a natty in women's golf and made a FF in women's basketball. So why not win the whole thing in women's football!?!?!?

CaptainPJ

9-4

Swaye said:

RaceBannon said:

The number of losses you choose is the number of league losses because if we? lose a non con game Petersen is fired no questions asked

Chick in black tank, back-right.

I'm going to find her and smack dem tittays!!

BennyBeaver

0-12

Tequilla said:

W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good

Disagree.

BallSacked

9-3

Losses: Stanford, @Oregon and one of Utah or SC.

Stanford does set up nicely tho for you guys tho: short week for trees after playing me, Friday night is prone to upsets, still new QB for Stanford.

That game is your season. Win that and you'll probably win the Norf.

RaceBannon

BallSacked said:

9-3

Losses: Stanford, @Oregon and one of Utah or SC.

Stanford does set up nicely tho for you guys tho: short week for trees after playing me, Friday night is prone to upsets, still new QB for Stanford.

That game is your season. Win that and you'll probably win the Norf.

Have to go through Pullman this year

UWhuskytskeet

9-4

CaptainPJ said:

Swaye said:

RaceBannon said:

The number of losses you choose is the number of league losses because if we? lose a non con game Petersen is fired no questions asked

Chick in black tank, back-right.

I'm going to find her and smack dem tittays!!

Disagree, gut sticks out further than tits.

TierbsHsotBoobs

0-12

UWhuskytskeet said:

CaptainPJ said:

Swaye said:

RaceBannon said:

The number of losses you choose is the number of league losses because if we? lose a non con game Petersen is fired no questions asked

Chick in black tank, back-right.

I'm going to find her and smack dem tittays!!

Disagree, gut sticks out further than tits.

Why do you hate pregnant sluts?

Tequilla

12-2 or 11-2

RoadDawg55 said:

Tequilla said:

I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year

3-0 Non-conference ... please

W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense

W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4

L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year

Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017

You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.

I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.

But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.

Fire_Marshall_Bill

10-3

I have to go with 10-3 but if they can at least split between whOregon and Furd, there's potential for 11-2. I see a third loss somewhere between a bowl game, a possible P 12 Championship Game, and just the general loser culture that they're trying to erase but we all know is still lingering, at least a little. They aren't quite elite until they prove it, but it is a good team.