Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2016 team record!!!

12357

Comments

  • Options
    unfrozencavemanunfrozencaveman Member Posts: 2,303
    5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary First Comment
    12-2 or 11-2
    STFU with the shit analysis and get your fucking sport-boner up

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV_srTFUJZ4
  • Options
    PurpleReignPurpleReign Member Posts: 5,457
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    7-6 (because we were 7-6 last year?)
    image
  • Options
    TequillaTequilla Member Posts: 19,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes 5 Fuck Offs
    12-2 or 11-2

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Dardanus said:

    Tequilla said:


    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year

    3-0 Non-conference ... please

    W @ Arizona: win by double digits
    W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
    W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
    W vs Oregon St: they suck
    W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
    W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
    L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
    W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
    W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense

    W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4

    L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year

    Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017

    You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.
    I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.

    But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
    I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.
    Definition of playing both sides ...

    If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...

    If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.

    It's not that hard to understand ...
    Admitting you were wrong about a prediction and being happy about it is not the same as moving the goalposts.

    Moving the goalposts is making a prediction, being wrong, then making excuses to convince people you were right the entire time.
    I don't use the "I would have been right except for this or that" excuse train that Auburndoog does ...

    Those that do that are obsessed with being right all the time ... Im wrong plenty ... also right plenty ... it evens out
    Disagree
    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/24560/tequilla-thoughts-oregon
    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/25247/tequilla-thoughts-go-fuck-yourself-edition
    There's nothing in there in any of those threads that are "we would have won except for this or that" ... closest you could point to was the commentary on VAJ's deep balls being the difference in the game (which it largely was)

    But keep pressing
    CHRIST:

    One thing that I haven't seen much on this board was discussion about how impactful Dwayne Washington's injury and inability to play was.

    More pressing and selective use of commentary ...

    At no point did I ever say that had DWash played in the game UW would have won
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    0-12
    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    Dardanus said:

    Tequilla said:


    Tequilla said:

    Tequilla said:

    I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year

    3-0 Non-conference ... please

    W @ Arizona: win by double digits
    W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
    W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
    W vs Oregon St: they suck
    W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
    W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
    L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
    W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
    W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense

    W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4

    L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year

    Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017

    You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.
    I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.

    But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
    I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.
    Definition of playing both sides ...

    If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...

    If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.

    It's not that hard to understand ...
    Admitting you were wrong about a prediction and being happy about it is not the same as moving the goalposts.

    Moving the goalposts is making a prediction, being wrong, then making excuses to convince people you were right the entire time.
    I don't use the "I would have been right except for this or that" excuse train that Auburndoog does ...

    Those that do that are obsessed with being right all the time ... Im wrong plenty ... also right plenty ... it evens out
    Disagree
    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/24560/tequilla-thoughts-oregon
    http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/25247/tequilla-thoughts-go-fuck-yourself-edition
    There's nothing in there in any of those threads that are "we would have won except for this or that" ... closest you could point to was the commentary on VAJ's deep balls being the difference in the game (which it largely was)

    But keep pressing
    CHRIST:

    One thing that I haven't seen much on this board was discussion about how impactful Dwayne Washington's injury and inability to play was.

    More pressing and selective use of commentary ...

    At no point did I ever say that had DWash played in the game UW would have won
    Then how was his injury impactful?
  • Options
    GladstoneGladstone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,417
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    10-3
    pre-week 13 check in bump

    hmm
  • Options
    RoadDawg55RoadDawg55 Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 30,123
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    9-4
    dhdawg said:

    holy shit. @Tequilla was dialed in, so far at least

    Blind squirrel.
  • Options
    TierbsHsotBoobsTierbsHsotBoobs Member Posts: 39,680
    Combo Breaker 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    0-12
    Looks like I was right
  • Options
    HuskiesADWHuskiesADW Member Posts: 141
    First Anniversary First Comment Name Dropper 5 Awesomes
    Damn @Tequilla what are the lotto numbers.
  • Options
    PurpleJPurpleJ Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 36,522
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes Combo Breaker
    Swaye's Wigwam
    8-5
    We can still lose the Apple Cup or the title game. :)
  • Options
    Dennis_DeYoungDennis_DeYoung Member Posts: 14,754
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Comment
    7-6 (because we were 7-6 last year?)

    Tequilla said:

    I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year

    3-0 Non-conference ... please

    W @ Arizona: win by double digits
    W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
    W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
    W vs Oregon St: they suck
    W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
    W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
    L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
    W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
    W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense

    W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4

    L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year

    Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017

    Hahahahahahahahahaha: @phineas @TierbsHsotBoobs @EsophagealFeces @Houhusky @DerekJohnson @Pitchfork51 @doogville @AZDuck @BennyBeaver fuck all y'all.

    My guy @Tequilla fucking nailed it. Congrats to my long-winded friend.
    Free pub!!!!! I said Babushka would get an undeserved extension. That is still in play. I'd fucking love to be wrong on that one. I'm also glad to be wrong about my 9-4 prediction. Only Doogs saw this coming, which explains why @Tequilla nailed it.
    I just said fuck all y'all because you guys WTF'd his poast. I chinned it. Therefore I'm better.

    And - the AZ game was the key game to the year. If Teq had listened to me and Coker he would look like a complete savant.
Sign In or Register to comment.