Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2016 team record!!!
Comments
-
0-12
I want 0-12 just so @Tequilla can be wrongTequilla said:
Definition of playing both sides ...RoadDawg55 said:
I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.Tequilla said:
I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.RoadDawg55 said:
You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.Tequilla said:I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year
3-0 Non-conference ... please
W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense
W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4
L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year
Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017
But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...
If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.
It's not that hard to understand ... -
9-4
Admitting you were wrong about a prediction and being happy about it is not the same as moving the goalposts.Tequilla said:
Definition of playing both sides ...RoadDawg55 said:
I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.Tequilla said:
I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.RoadDawg55 said:
You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.Tequilla said:I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year
3-0 Non-conference ... please
W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense
W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4
L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year
Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017
But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...
If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.
It's not that hard to understand ...
Moving the goalposts is making a prediction, being wrong, then making excuses to convince people you were right the entire time. -
10-3I think it's going to be an early to mid 80s type Husky team that is clearly good, but isn't quite elite. They'll lose some game they shouldn't like WSU. Some on here expect top five yearly. Not going to happen at this point.
-
0-12
10-3 in this conference isn't good.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:I think it's going to be an early to mid 80s type Husky team that is clearly good, but isn't quite elite. They'll lose some game they shouldn't like WSU. Some on here expect top five yearly. Not going to happen at this point.
-
More than 56% of the fanbase on here has 10 wins or GTFO.
Sounds like many never learn.
Oh and how is Hardcore Husky a Doog board????? -
0-12Are people serious with this 10+ win bullshit? Beating Oregon like its nothing? This has become a piss poor forum
-
has become?
-
0-12HardcoreDawgman.com
-
15-0 or 1-loss or whatever unrealistic expectations you have
Agreed. Expecting 10+ wins is crazy.phineas said:Are people serious with this 10+ win bullshit? Beating Oregon like its nothing? This has become a piss poor forum
-
0-12I'm expecting to fuck Giselle Brady next week too, bro.
