Time to Embarrass Yourself Again!!! Predict UW's 2016 team record!!!
Comments
-
12-2 or 11-2STFU with the shit analysis and get your fucking sport-boner up
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eV_srTFUJZ4 -
7-6 (because we were 7-6 last year?)
-
12-2 or 11-2
I would've Chincredibled this poast if you had made the USC score 81-0. 76-0 was also an acceptable answer.haie said:Script Time:
Rutgers: Husky Nation is shocked as the Scarlett Knights live up to their name and cut Browning in half in the first quarter. KJC-S is brought in and fumbles the ball 5 times while the coaches try to run the option that was practiced 0 times in fall camp. L
Idaho: Smith desperately puts Lindquist in for Idaho where he throws for 300 yards off of 3 100 yard bombs to Ross and 5 interceptions, 4 of which returned back to the daWg house. L
PSU: Jake Rodriguez is brought in to start where you have Vikings vs. Hombres. JRod blood eagled in the 3rd quarter, cuououogs laugh at us at Vikes secure Cascadia Cup. L
(They also beat Central 100-0 right before they drop football, so AOG finally kills himself)
Arizona: The hyphen kid we got from the state is brought in for some revenge action until a doog comes up right before kickoff and tells him that we just can't compete in this weather. L
Stanford: Fozzy Bear (or whatever the fuck his name is) declares for Furd right before kickoff, half the staff kills themselves and Linquist is brought back in because you just have to counter clean cut white kids with another clean cut white kid. L
Oregon: Freeman runs for 200 and Devon Allen scores thrice on 3 reverses. L
Beavs: Benny the Beaver accidentally drops his chainsaw on Gaskin's thigh before kickoff. Reeser Stadium goes wild as a walk-on from Forest Grove runs for 200+. L
Utah: Whittingham suggests that UW might be better off going to the MWC. Troy Williams Heisman campaign rolls on. L
Cal: Sean McGrew is pounding Cal up their gay hairy asses until Smith decides he needs to break out his toolbox of fucktardedness during every trip to the redzone. L
USC: USC watches game film from last year, runs it up the middle literally every down and wins 88-0. L
ASU: Bridge-Gadd is brought back against another 'Zona opponent until a doog walks up to him and informs him that you just can't transition from playing hs ball in a warm-weather state to playing in hurricane-style winds. Graham reaches out to Cohen and says he's done actually coaching, wants a lifetime contract to coach UW. L
Wazzu: Announced before halftime that Husky Stadium is being turned into a pea patch because of the sustainability prospects. Everyone wearing purple kills themselves. L -
12-2 or 11-2
More pressing and selective use of commentary ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
CHRIST:Tequilla said:
There's nothing in there in any of those threads that are "we would have won except for this or that" ... closest you could point to was the commentary on VAJ's deep balls being the difference in the game (which it largely was)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
DisagreeTequilla said:
I don't use the "I would have been right except for this or that" excuse train that Auburndoog does ...Dardanus said:
Admitting you were wrong about a prediction and being happy about it is not the same as moving the goalposts.Tequilla said:
Definition of playing both sides ...RoadDawg55 said:
I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.Tequilla said:
I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.RoadDawg55 said:
You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.Tequilla said:I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year
3-0 Non-conference ... please
W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense
W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4
L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year
Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017
But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...
If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.
It's not that hard to understand ...
Moving the goalposts is making a prediction, being wrong, then making excuses to convince people you were right the entire time.
Those that do that are obsessed with being right all the time ... Im wrong plenty ... also right plenty ... it evens out
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/24560/tequilla-thoughts-oregon
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/25247/tequilla-thoughts-go-fuck-yourself-edition
But keep pressing
One thing that I haven't seen much on this board was discussion about how impactful Dwayne Washington's injury and inability to play was.
At no point did I ever say that had DWash played in the game UW would have won -
0-12
Then how was his injury impactful?Tequilla said:
More pressing and selective use of commentary ...TierbsHsotBoobs said:
CHRIST:Tequilla said:
There's nothing in there in any of those threads that are "we would have won except for this or that" ... closest you could point to was the commentary on VAJ's deep balls being the difference in the game (which it largely was)TierbsHsotBoobs said:
DisagreeTequilla said:
I don't use the "I would have been right except for this or that" excuse train that Auburndoog does ...Dardanus said:
Admitting you were wrong about a prediction and being happy about it is not the same as moving the goalposts.Tequilla said:
Definition of playing both sides ...RoadDawg55 said:
I predicted 9-4. I don't think we will win the North. I will be happy if we do. It's not that hard to understand. Fuck off.Tequilla said:
I'd rather have the balls to have expectations and stick my neck out by saying what it is that I see versus sitting back, criticizing others, and being a loser that always expects the worst.RoadDawg55 said:
You picked 12-1 the year before. Fuck off.Tequilla said:I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year
3-0 Non-conference ... please
W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense
W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4
L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year
Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017
But then again, you get off on saying that people (notably me) are guilty of "moving goal posts" by actually reviewing what happened and comparing what one was expecting versus what happened.
If the record plays to not win the North, you can sit back and say that you were right ...
If they win the North, you'll doog up the victory, say that you underestimated this or that (moving the goal posts) and when you get called on being too pessimistic before the season just default into the "well, they had to prove it before I believed it" dismissiveness.
It's not that hard to understand ...
Moving the goalposts is making a prediction, being wrong, then making excuses to convince people you were right the entire time.
Those that do that are obsessed with being right all the time ... Im wrong plenty ... also right plenty ... it evens out
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/24560/tequilla-thoughts-oregon
http://forum.hardcorehusky.com/discussion/25247/tequilla-thoughts-go-fuck-yourself-edition
But keep pressing
One thing that I haven't seen much on this board was discussion about how impactful Dwayne Washington's injury and inability to play was.
At no point did I ever say that had DWash played in the game UW would have won -
10-3pre-week 13 check in bump
hmm -
9-4holy shit. @Tequilla was dialed in, so far at least
-
10-3
This post was WTFd off the page. Amazing.Tequilla said:I was dialed in last year ... so let's see how it goes this year
3-0 Non-conference ... please
W @ Arizona: win by double digits
W vs Stanford: QB play will be a huge issue for the Tree
W @ Oregon: they just won't be that good
W vs Oregon St: they suck
W @ Utah: will be a close game, don't think that they have the offense
W @ Cal: Cal's going to be a disaster by the end of the year
L vs USC: Welcome back to reality game for us
W vs ASU: Bad weather game where ASU just wants to go home
W @ Wazzu: Our defense is made for their offense
W vs PAC South Dreck: South winner will be lucky to be better than 8-4
L vs Bowl Game: No clue if that's Rose Bowl or National Semi ... but that will be by far the best team we play all year ... PAC is going to be dreck this year
Will end the year 12-2 primed to go on a very strong run in 2017 -
-
10-3Big ups to @Tequilla, no doubt about it.
