Jen Cohen refers to scholarship costs as "Welfare payments"
Comments
-
Cyber?Baseman said: -
Wait, Cohen is suggesting attendance is too low? Didn't she just say she has the best sales team already?
-
Did you ever stop to consider how shitty attendance would be if her sales team wasn't the best? I didn't think so.Meek said:Wait, Cohen is suggesting attendance is too low? Didn't she just say she has the best sales team already?
-
Tequilla said:
@Gladstone hits the nail on the head
I need way more than 140000 characters to respond to anythingthis shit -
The silver lining in all of this is that pressure should mount to shut down and scale back some shit programs that draw no support, but suck off the football revenues to exist. It won't happen overnight, but with rising costs, it will put a spotlight on useless programs that don't justify the dollars they currently get. That's what should happen. If it doesn't, and the losses mount, pressure will mount for a different AD. Pay attention to the shit show on upper campus at present. Legislators do, and UW has an uphill battle getting more state dollars when "students" are blocking traffic on I5, and AD's are losing millions.
-
You realize you're talking about the same legislators who get their votes from the students blocking traffic, right?TurdBuffer said:The silver lining in all of this is that pressure should mount to shut down and scale back some shit programs that draw no support, but suck off the football revenues to exist. It won't happen overnight, but with rising costs, it will put a spotlight on useless programs that don't justify the dollars they currently get. That's what should happen. If it doesn't, and the losses mount, pressure will mount for a different AD. Pay attention to the shit show on upper campus at present. Legislators do, and UW has an uphill battle getting more state dollars when "students" are blocking traffic on I5, and AD's are losing millions.
-
Not in the Senate. You realize Republicans run it because Conservative Dems flipped to their side, right?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You realize you're talking about the same legislators who get their votes from the students blocking traffic, right?TurdBuffer said:The silver lining in all of this is that pressure should mount to shut down and scale back some shit programs that draw no support, but suck off the football revenues to exist. It won't happen overnight, but with rising costs, it will put a spotlight on useless programs that don't justify the dollars they currently get. That's what should happen. If it doesn't, and the losses mount, pressure will mount for a different AD. Pay attention to the shit show on upper campus at present. Legislators do, and UW has an uphill battle getting more state dollars when "students" are blocking traffic on I5, and AD's are losing millions.
-
So 49% of the senate loves those traffic blocking protestor students. Point still stands.TurdBuffer said:
Not in the Senate. You realize Republicans run it because Conservative Dems flipped to their side, right?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You realize you're talking about the same legislators who get their votes from the students blocking traffic, right?TurdBuffer said:The silver lining in all of this is that pressure should mount to shut down and scale back some shit programs that draw no support, but suck off the football revenues to exist. It won't happen overnight, but with rising costs, it will put a spotlight on useless programs that don't justify the dollars they currently get. That's what should happen. If it doesn't, and the losses mount, pressure will mount for a different AD. Pay attention to the shit show on upper campus at present. Legislators do, and UW has an uphill battle getting more state dollars when "students" are blocking traffic on I5, and AD's are losing millions.
-
Seattle Democrats are pretty much hated outside of Seattle. In case you didn't know. I'm sure the Seattle Dems love those students and probably march along with them. But working class Everett and Tacoma military families hate their fucking guts.CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
So 49% of the senate loves those traffic blocking protestor students. Point still stands.TurdBuffer said:
Not in the Senate. You realize Republicans run it because Conservative Dems flipped to their side, right?CFetters_Nacho_Lover said:
You realize you're talking about the same legislators who get their votes from the students blocking traffic, right?TurdBuffer said:The silver lining in all of this is that pressure should mount to shut down and scale back some shit programs that draw no support, but suck off the football revenues to exist. It won't happen overnight, but with rising costs, it will put a spotlight on useless programs that don't justify the dollars they currently get. That's what should happen. If it doesn't, and the losses mount, pressure will mount for a different AD. Pay attention to the shit show on upper campus at present. Legislators do, and UW has an uphill battle getting more state dollars when "students" are blocking traffic on I5, and AD's are losing millions.





