This shit happens with every homer sports station. "Let's beat are fucking chest and cry like hell when we schedule a TUFF out of conference, and complain that more schools don't. But at the same time we will justify our community college out of conference schedule because everybody else does the same thing." We all know it's in the middle. UW's previous OOC schedules weren't impossible, and other schools weren't that bad. However, next year, I think UW has the easiest OOC I have ever seen from an AQ school. Hugh is doing what any other radio host would do when his job is decided on by the university. None of these radio hosts will ever dare to question the University or it's staff. The players on the other hand are fair game. And in Hugh's mind, short black QBs.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
And it is more about keeping up with the Jones' than protecting Sark.
Pure and simple it has to do with the amount of $$$ floating around college football.
Good Christ. Yes, there has always been shitty teams on the schedule (expect the years when the schedule was too tuff and the doogs were upset), but your scholarship numbers thing is fucktarded.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
And it is more about keeping up with the Jones' than protecting Sark.
Pure and simple it has to do with the amount of $$$ floating around college football.
Bullshit. Did the San Jose Sts, Pacifics and Toledos suck and were they cupcakes? Fuck yeah they were but they a higher quality opponent than the dreckfest (#Hi Sven!) that Pool Boy is scheduling.
Don James teams against Pacific is like Bellevue playing Seattle Prep.
Sark teams against Idaho fucking State is like Bellevue playing the Seattle Prep freshman team.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
Thanks for finally getting it. Shitty FBS teams with 85 scholarships are better opponents than FCS schools, just like D grades are better than F grades.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
Thanks for finally getting it. Shitty FBS teams with 85 scholarships are better opponents than FCS schools, just like D grades are better than F grades.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
Thanks for finally getting it. Shitty FBS teams with 85 scholarships are better opponents than FCS schools, just like D grades are better than F grades.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
Thanks for finally getting it. Shitty FBS teams with 85 scholarships are better opponents than FCS schools, just like D grades are better than F grades.
LEAVE!
We got too many thread going, but you are dumber than I thought (not sure that is possible) if you think ND St could not compete with the likes of South Ala. (So. Utah says hi) in the fucking Sun Belt.
I will try and respond before the thread veers of course. The EWU, Portland St, etc are now what the San Jose St, Pacific, Toledo, etc of the world once where before the 100 scholarship limits. Right now 180 kids are pushed down because of the limits on the Pac 12 teams, so the talent level has been spread throughout the mid majors, forcing more talented players to play into the sub division.
The majority of Husky schedules have included a cupcake.
Wow. Vehemently disagree. If UW's OOC sched used to follow an A-B-C formula (or A-A-C in some years), this year's is B-C-F. Next year's is C-D-F-F.
Were weren't talking about the SOS? I was pointing out the back in the day, teams like San Jose St, Toledo, Pacific (RIP) were getting some of the kids that are no forced down to sub division because of scholarship limits.
As for next year's SOS, I do AGREE it is a joke.
There are more kids getting FBS scholarships now than there were kids getting I-A scholarships 30 years ago.
Don't let math ruin your fucktarded arguments though.
Old Dominion approves this fucking stupid post.
Just because the keep adding crappy teams to the FBS, does not change the argument that the talent is getting diluted.
Actually, the numbers show that the increase in crappy FBS teams over the past 30 years provided a home for the talent dilution and for 800 kids that would have been in I-AA 30 years ago.
Do REAL research or get the fuck out of here.
That probable explains why a record # of FBS teams lost to lower division schools on the opening weekend.
One week of anecdotal data doesn't beat simple math.
Well, I guess if they keep adding shitty FBS teams then your "math" wins.
Thanks for finally getting it. Shitty FBS teams with 85 scholarships are better opponents than FCS schools, just like D grades are better than F grades.
LEAVE!
We got too many thread going, but you are dumber than I thought (not sure that is possible) if you think ND St could not compete with the likes of South Ala. (So. Utah says hi) in the fucking Sun Belt.
Of course there are isolated cases. The best FCS team is better than the worst FBS team 8 out of 10 years.
The problem is that you can't schedule years in advance to get the best FCS team, so you have to go with the overall data instead of isolated anecdotal examples.
In general, the shitty FBS team with 85 scholarships will be tougher than the good FCS team with 63 scholarships.
Stop cherry picking. You think you're better than that, so be better than that.
Comments
Don James teams against Pacific is like Bellevue playing Seattle Prep.
Sark teams against Idaho fucking State is like Bellevue playing the Seattle Prep freshman team.
08/30 - at Hawaii
09/06 - Eastern Washington
09/13 - Illinois
09/20 - Georgia State
Is still more challenging than Arizona's 2013 schedule:
N. Arizona
@ UNLV
UTSA (San Antonio)
LEAVE!
Sorry other Huskies.
The problem is that you can't schedule years in advance to get the best FCS team, so you have to go with the overall data instead of isolated anecdotal examples.
In general, the shitty FBS team with 85 scholarships will be tougher than the good FCS team with 63 scholarships.
Stop cherry picking. You think you're better than that, so be better than that.
Sounds like LOSER has gotten under your skin on a couple of boards.
What a pussy.
Unlike some people who just whine as they pick the sand out of their vagina.