Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?
Comments
-
Nil-nil draw IMO
-
The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game. -
Obviously there is no way to know until the game is actually played, but this is an insane "I hope" type of post.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game. -
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali . -
SC didn't beat any Pac12 team by more than 28 points last year, you fucktard. They beat the coogs by 27 and Colorado by 28.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .
Stop dreaming of getting Eiffel Tower'd by Sark and Cody McDreamy and think logically for once in your miserable life. -
Would WTF but don't want to bury it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
-
But how is sugarsteve a Sark homer?
-
Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
-
Should we start a Gulag/Ice Skating forum?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
-
I know you are being sarkastic, but Kessler doesn't show up to 1/3 of the games he plays.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
