Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?

AtomicPiss

foxsports.com/college-football/story/will-washington-be-extra-motivated-to-beat-usc-this-season-052215

RoadDawg55

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

SpoonieLuv

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

It's never gaurantee that Sark will plunger anyone. The overarching theme to his time at UW was his inexplicable tendency to lose games he should win and win a few he should lose. I don't see us winning but it's coin flip odds.

Muttzen

Only if we bring a caged Trojan to practice.

NeGgaPlEaSe

Pete and Lindy take this one, in a Sark what the fuq moment. The young guys prove to be motivated and hungry

Doogles

SpoonieLuv said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

It's never gaurantee that Sark will plunger anyone. The overarching theme to his time at UW was his inexplicable tendency to lose games he should win and win a few he should lose. I don't see us winning but it's coin flip odds.

Disagree. Sark plungers the teams he should beat* and gets plungered by the teams he needs to beat to turn the corner.

Stanford and USC with their back up QBs were his only surprise wins. That and the Holiday Bowl that brought us back to glory.

*excludes road game coin flips pretty much anywhere but Corvallis.

bananasnblondes

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

You mean like the Oregon State game?

Doogles

Also, the line by Alicia de Artola that wonders if Pete will be more motivated to beat the school that rejected him in favor of Sark couldn't be more false or poorly researched.

My conclusion is Sark has officially 2 holed her. She has subscribed to his "Access for Access" program Kim can't quit.

SpoonieLuv

Only one person in this picture knows how to operate a plunger.





Pete looks embarrassed to be seen with this clown.

GrundleStiltzkin

bananasnblondes said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

You mean like the Oregon State game?

Down vote for no 75k ;-)

sjd

SpoonieLuv said:

Only one person in this picture knows how to operate a plunger.





Pete looks embarrassed to be seen with this clown.

The Cult of Sarkinality has Sark roaming the CenturyLink sideline in a few years.

#Script

Gladstone

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

BallSacked

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

SC I think will struggle to defend the run and they won't be great at running the ball either. If UW can hold the SC passing by getting pressure on Kessler and covering their WRs (who aren't as good a group as last year)...I think it'll be competitive and in the 'Sark fuck up' zone.

Bye week helps UW here as well.

UWerentThereMan

When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?

Gladstone

UWerentThereMan said:

When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?

Disagree

Doogles

Gladstone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

puppylove_sugarsteel

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.

Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand It

BallSacked

puppylove_sugarsteel said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.

Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand It

Slow your roll Sugarshittube and get Sarks dick out of your crusty stank blowhole. You are clueless. 9-3 at best. More likely 8-4.

Just because Kim Sark and Fatters used you as their jizz dumpster all those years, doesn't mean you have to keep servicing them here. You're free.

Gladstone

Doogles said:

Gladstone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.

Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.

PostGameOrangeSlices

Gladstone said:

RoadDawg55 said:

They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.

That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.

puppylove_sugarsteel

Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.

After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.

Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.