Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?
Comments
-
Nil-nil draw IMO
-
The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game. -
Obviously there is no way to know until the game is actually played, but this is an insane "I hope" type of post.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game. -
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali . -
SC didn't beat any Pac12 team by more than 28 points last year, you fucktard. They beat the coogs by 27 and Colorado by 28.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Difference between what? 21-28 points? Game will be out of reach in 1st quarter. Nothing to do with Peetamus as a coach,or UW as a program, just way less talented (starting 22), much less experience and its on the road. Open your fucking eyes.whatshouldicareabout said:The game is a Thursday night game, meaning a BYE before and a lot of ESPN hype and probably a big recruiting weekend for USC.
Petersen will have his team mentally prepared. Sark won't.
That should be the difference in the game.
Give me one area UW will be better than SC besides kicking ? ONE besides "head" coaching? Listen, it will get very ugly, very quickly.
Roadie, maybe Fire Marshall (the only 2 guys with any football sense here) might be objective enough to see the reality, on a that soon-to-be frightful night in Cali .
Stop dreaming of getting Eiffel Tower'd by Sark and Cody McDreamy and think logically for once in your miserable life. -
Would WTF but don't want to bury it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
-
But how is sugarsteve a Sark homer?
-
Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
-
Should we start a Gulag/Ice Skating forum?PostGameOrangeSlices said:Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
-
I know you are being sarkastic, but Kessler doesn't show up to 1/3 of the games he plays.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
-
RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
Only Problem is Sark is not a top 10 coach, meaning he may go to sleep on this game, Lindy could rush for 200 yards and throw for 300, and we all know the dumb look on Sark's face
-
NeGgaPlEaSe said:RoadDawg55 said:
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
and we all know the dumb look on Sark's face
-
Sorry dudes we are definitely getting plungered. The tape doesn't bode well for us:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ufxbwT4WM08
-
Marshall*PostGameOrangeSlices said:Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
-
re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
-
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.Meek said:re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.
-
Look, another thread with Puppy slurping Sark.
-
and Sark would leave him in well into the 4th quarterBallSacked said:
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.Meek said:re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno. -
HopeDerekJohnson said:
and Sark would leave him in well into the 4th quarterBallSacked said:
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.Meek said:re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.cylermax Browne is ready. -
I hope Dissly rips Kessler's spine out from him and wears it as a Montanian trophy.
-
Off Season Dooging! A tradition like no other.
-
There really is nothing better. I love doogin' sometimes!RoadDawg55 said:Off Season Dooging! A tradition like no other.
-
WASHINGTON wins this game
-
I expect UW to win this game because I'm not a fucking doog
-
RoadDawg55 said:
Off Season
DoogingNatty! A tradition like no other. -
I would think you'd want to defeat any team sarkisian coached. If he became a Duck coach I would burn Autzen Stadium to fucking ashes and become a Beaver or a Husky fan.
-
Sark should know half of the Huskies' players In N' Out, since he recruited and (allegedly) developed them. That should give him some sort of advantage.
It's a bit early, but this game will tell us more about Petersen than about Sark. How quickly is Petersen getting his system in place? -
Awesomed because PLSS WTF'd it.BallSacked said:
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.Gladstone said:
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
-
42-6. Sorry guys, and thomas, I was a little harsh. 35-6
-
You're the new Arizona123, so I say dawgs by 7puppylove_sugarsteel said:42-6. Sorry guys, and thomas, I was a little harsh. 35-6
