Will Washington be extra motivated to beat USC this season?
Comments
-
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
SC I think will struggle to defend the run and they won't be great at running the ball either. If UW can hold the SC passing by getting pressure on Kessler and covering their WRs (who aren't as good a group as last year)...I think it'll be competitive and in the 'Sark fuck up' zone.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
Bye week helps UW here as well.
-
When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?
-
DisagreeUWerentThereMan said:When will we the the game day sign thread for this match-up?
-
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
-
Slow your roll Sugarshittube and get Sarks dick out of your crusty stank blowhole. You are clueless. 9-3 at best. More likely 8-4.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Sark aint losing 3 games with a senior qb, and possibly the best one in the country. 11-2, pac12 south champs. Go ahead and brand ItRoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at MOST 2 games next year, but titey are going to plunger UW.
Just because Kim Sark and Fatters used you as their jizz dumpster all those years, doesn't mean you have to keep servicing them here. You're free.
-
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.Doogles said:
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Gladstone said:
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.RoadDawg55 said:They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
-
Sark will beat Petes meat by 21pts next year. And if Lindy is the qb in '16, the same will happen at home. Motivation is all good, but talent is the great equalizer.
After Kessler, A future 1st rounder in Max Browning steps in for '16, with 18 returning starters. SC is only going up. We are too, just at a slower pace. Like beating a dead horse with some of you. The QB situation is FUCKING DIRE. No way to sugarcoat it. Last year we had the WORST stable of QB'S in the cuntry.
Here's an experiment for the nerdy types like thomas who have nothing to add here. Do some research for the good of the group; find a team, 1 out of 126 remaing teams, who had a shittier stable of QB's than UW last year? Fast forward to '15....find another. Come on Thomas, show us your stuff.
