They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
Only Problem is Sark is not a top 10 coach, meaning he may go to sleep on this game, Lindy could rush for 200 yards and throw for 300, and we all know the dumb look on Sark's face
They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.
I think UW will keep it competitive.
USC will be a preseason top 10 team. UW is getting picked 8-10th in the Pac 12. I know preseason rankings can be FS, but let's be real. UW has way more question marks than USC. USC has a good QB. USC has returning starters on the OL. USC has more playmakers on offense. Kessler is probably overrated, but he's still one of the better QB's in the conference and miles (pun intended) better than any UW QB. And while I am more optimistic about UW's defense, they are replacing a lot of guys on that side of the ball.
The only way USC loses is if they don't show up. And with a Thursday Night home game, with some added motivation for Sark, they will show up. They are way better and while Sark is a bad coach, @Doogles had it right. He gets plungered in road games. And he will again next year.
Listen Peter Beaters, I've been on the Peterman train since the beggining. But Sark has too much talent on his roster. Give Petey a few more years and him and Sark will be fighting for the Pac yearly. Oh and Freeme, J, Boobie, stick to ice skating because football is for the real men like me and the Fire Marshal, okay boys? ; ))))
re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.
re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.
and Sark would leave him in well into the 4th quarter
re: Kessler as the amazing Sr QB of the year, I am open to being proven wrong, by I saw what Sark was able to do with Lockner in that magical Heisman year after the impressive junior year, and I'll put a few chips down betting Kessler doesn't look nearly as good this season.
Kessler is a better version of Keith Price. A solid, above average QB, but looks better than he is because he piles up stats when plungering the dreckfest of dreck.
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.
and Sark would leave him in well into the 4th quarter
I would think you'd want to defeat any team sarkisian coached. If he became a Duck coach I would burn Autzen Stadium to fucking ashes and become a Beaver or a Husky fan.
Sark should know half of the Huskies' players In N' Out, since he recruited and (allegedly) developed them. That should give him some sort of advantage.
It's a bit early, but this game will tell us more about Petersen than about Sark. How quickly is Petersen getting his system in place?
They might be, but it won't matter. USC will lose at least 3 games next year, but they are going to plunger UW.
That six people have already up voted this depresses me. I am a roaddawg fan, but fuck your dismissive pessimism dude.
Sounds like you want to take the gloves off and that you're glad you're not like him.
Nah he's one of the best posters here but given the depth issues SC has, who their fucktarded coach is, and how we highly we view Petersen (and being in his 2nd year with his system)...I can't in good faith just anecdotally say they're going to crush us. In fact I'd say some of the intangibles would favor us.
This. If you're looking at their roster - I'd say they are worse at: RB, WR, TE, DL, LB than they were last year. They are going to have several freshmen in the front seven. Fucktards, like Sugarshittube, point to Kessler like he is fucking Mariota, but he was good at piling up stats vs shit teams and was really average vs the rest.
Comments
Only Problem is Sark is not a top 10 coach, meaning he may go to sleep on this game, Lindy could rush for 200 yards and throw for 300, and we all know the dumb look on Sark's face
He had 40 TDs last year and literally half of them came in 3 blowouts vs Colorado, ND, and Fresno.
cylermax Browne is ready.It's a bit early, but this game will tell us more about Petersen than about Sark. How quickly is Petersen getting his system in place?