That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.
Who fucking cares about Sark at UW anymore? Even most Sark supporters on Doogman and in the media admit that Petersen is a clear upgrade. Why do we need to discuss? Move on to another topic.
That is fantasy, It was Sark's team, his players, and his game plan. Sark won 9 last year.
Who fucking cares about Sark at UW anymore? Even most Sark supporters on Doogman and in the media admit that Petersen is a clear upgrade. Why do we need to discuss? Move on to another topic.
No, please show me a time when UW was consistenly 1 or 2 in the conference? please look at the history and outside of a 10 year stretch from 1984 to 1994, our history mimics the current Sarkish trends.
It's hard for any team to sustain that, but we're stuck in 7-5 and 8-4 mode. Don James had his down years in the late 80s, but there were the corresponding top ten and or BCS level bowl years in the late 70s, early 80s and early 90s.
No, please show me a time when UW was consistenly 1 or 2 in the conference? please look at the history and outside of a 10 year stretch from 1984 to 1994, our history mimics the current Sarkish trends.
It's hard for any team to sustain that, but we're stuck in 7-5 and 8-4 mode. Don James had his down years in the late 80s, but there were the corresponding top ten and or BCS level bowl years in the late 70s, early 80s and early 90s.
Don James never had to play a ranked Utah. How would a James team compete on the road with that Utah student section?
The guys on the huskyfan podcast, use perverse language to deride other outlets and other fans (again I went over this in the podcast), they criticize any critical analysis of the team, they are in love with cyler miles and deride anyone who thinks he is not the guy, etc, again all of this is in the podcast. their hatred of sark, dawgman, softy, hugh, etc are another aspect of this which divides the fan base and it is also detailed in the podcast.
Comments