Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Saban and Harbaugh also lost to Willingham.
You really don't get it.
Especially after Peterman joins the "lost by 21+ parade," I still won't be getting it.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Saban and Harbaugh also lost to Willingham.
You really don't get it.
Especially after Peterman joins the "lost by 21+ parade," I still won't be getting it.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
It's logical to think Oregon wins easily. The line is 21 for a reason, but don't be a moron. How exactly is Cal an offensive shitstorm? Cal scored 21 more points against Arizona that Oregon did. Go to doogman and Educk with that shit. HH is for real football talk.
Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Saban and Harbaugh also lost to Willingham.
You really don't get it.
Especially after Peterman joins the "lost by 21+ parade," I still won't be getting it.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
It's logical to think Oregon wins easily. The line is 21 for a reason, but don't be a moron. How exactly is Cal an offensive shitstorm? Cal scored 21 more points against Arizona that Oregon did. Go to doogman and Educk with that shit. HH is for real football talk. If you can't see a team who's dropped 31, 55, 59, 60, and 45 against 3 pac-12 and one B1G team before facing UW is an "offensive shitstorm" than I can't help you
I will readily admit that I thought last year was UW's best chance to end the streak, but after seeing how OR has played this year, due to the OL injuries and the D being the worst in a decade, I have to wonder if UW's best chance at ending the streak may be this year.
I will readily admit that I thought last year was UW's best chance to end the streak, but after seeing how OR has played this year, due to the OL injuries and the D being the worst in a decade, I have to wonder if UW's best chance at ending the streak may be this year.
Sark was the coach last year.
Oregon would have run the streak to 30 in a row if not for Saint Pat.
I will readily admit that I thought last year was UW's best chance to end the streak, but after seeing how OR has played this year, due to the OL injuries and the D being the worst in a decade, I have to wonder if UW's best chance at ending the streak may be this year.
Sark was the coach last year.
Oregon would have run the streak to 30 in a row if not for Saint Pat.
Good point, El Siete was more of a politician than a CFB coach. It would seem UW upgraded in a big way by losing him to USC while gaining Petersen. Although, its rather sad for both our fan bases that Petersen and Helfrich want to have babies together.
Oregon's Greatest Team of All Time lost to Willingham.
huh?
Has me confused, too, because it would be hard to argue that the best OR team of all time was the same OR team that was the first, last, and only team to ever win the PAC10 by going undefeated (when we still played round robin / every team) in 2010.
Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Coaching: Petersen >>> Helfrich. No comments needed here.
Lol. I saw STAN @ UW. Peterman can go toe to toe on "fucking stupid coaching" with anyone in the game.
Push with Slingblade,
He also went 92-12 at Boise. If you had just watched Alabama Auburn last year and no other game you would say the same thing about Saban, coaches have bad games. If it becomes a trend, Petersen will definitely be up for criticism
Cool story bro. You'd think his caliber of genius could handle fucking Nevada with the BCS on the line, no?
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Saban and Harbaugh also lost to Willingham.
You really don't get it.
Especially after Peterman joins the "lost by 21+ parade," I still won't be getting it.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
It's logical to think Oregon wins easily. The line is 21 for a reason, but don't be a moron. How exactly is Cal an offensive shitstorm? Cal scored 21 more points against Arizona that Oregon did. Go to doogman and Educk with that shit. HH is for real football talk.
If you can't see a team who's dropped 31, 55, 59, 60, and 45 against 3 pac-12 and one B1G team before facing UW is an "offensive shitstorm" than I can't help you
I see. Beating the Bay Area Dykes is the standard of excellence now.
I will readily admit that I thought last year was UW's best chance to end the streak, but after seeing how OR has played this year, due to the OL injuries and the D being the worst in a decade, I have to wonder if UW's best chance at ending the streak may be this year.
They're bringing a QB who makes Keith Price look like the love child of Brett Farvruh and the White House Wookie, dipped into the River Styx by his teef.
Comments
24-20
Huskies
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
Saban and Harbaugh also lost to Willingham.
You really don't get it.
You really don't get it.
Especially after Peterman joins the "lost by 21+ parade," I still won't be getting it.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
You've played a beavis-soft OOC schedule. You dropped the only "name brand" game you've played. And peterman went full retard on the sidelines during the contest.
I don't have a boatload of faith in Slingblade, but no one is quaking in their shoes about a bunch of blacurple clad cupcake munchers touting their D—who has played a who's who of offensive shitstorms, the exception being an FCS squad that dropped 52 points on you at home.
It's logical to think Oregon wins easily. The line is 21 for a reason, but don't be a moron. How exactly is Cal an offensive shitstorm? Cal scored 21 more points against Arizona that Oregon did. Go to doogman and Educk with that shit. HH is for real football talk.
If you can't see a team who's dropped 31, 55, 59, 60, and 45 against 3 pac-12 and one B1G team before facing UW is an "offensive shitstorm" than I can't help you
Oregon would have run the streak to 30 in a row if not for Saint Pat.
Chizik was just a figurehead. Sorta like the douche bag projection of the Wizard of Oz. The real wizard was behind the curtains. Hth.
To be fair, Oregon lost to whoever the bag man was that delivered the money to the Newton family.
That was a really sneaky, underhanded and well concealed hillbilly plot. Kind of like this one:
Ha! That sure looks rather reminiscent of CAL versus OR.
Yeah, he beat Oregon twice, but his Johnny Kreese is now in L.A.
Coaches have bad games? That's not strong enough phrasing to capture dropping one by double digits to Try Loserham.
I see. Beating the Bay Area Dykes is the standard of excellence now.