Finally viewed the UCLA-Oregon replay.
Comments
-
Do you have red S's on your helmets? No. You couldn't hold EWU to under 50 points and you think you'll hold Oregon to under 30? That's some potent kool aid you're drinking.PostGameOrangeSlices said:I like the doogs in this one.
Seriously, I do. I'm drinking the kool-aid.
Our d-line is only giving up 3.1 yards per rushing attempt, and I think our secondary is VASTLY improved since the start of the year.
If we score over 28, we will win this game. I don't think Oregon scores more than that. -
I shouldn't even respond to your quack ass, but our D has significantly improved since EWU. It's possible, and since i'm doogin and picking the daWgs, it's most likely happening in a low scoring affair versus a shoot out.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Do you have red S's on your helmets? No. You couldn't hold EWU to under 50 points and you think you'll hold Oregon to under 30? That's some potent kool aid you're drinking.PostGameOrangeSlices said:I like the doogs in this one.
Seriously, I do. I'm drinking the kool-aid.
Our d-line is only giving up 3.1 yards per rushing attempt, and I think our secondary is VASTLY improved since the start of the year.
If we score over 28, we will win this game. I don't think Oregon scores more than that. -
The young secondary was the problem in that game, and they've improved rapidly.oregonblitzkrieg said:
Do you have red S's on your helmets? No. You couldn't hold EWU to under 50 points and you think you'll hold Oregon to under 30? That's some potent kool aid you're drinking.PostGameOrangeSlices said:I like the doogs in this one.
Seriously, I do. I'm drinking the kool-aid.
Our d-line is only giving up 3.1 yards per rushing attempt, and I think our secondary is VASTLY improved since the start of the year.
If we score over 28, we will win this game. I don't think Oregon scores more than that.
Cal was averaging 50+ and throwing for 450+ a game, and our D fucked them up...@ Cal. Not a lot of wide open Bear receivers running down the field, which was the issue in the EWU game.
That same Cal offense gave Arizona's defense FITS in the desert....and Arizona's defense didn't seem too intimidated in Autzen.
I know the transitive property doesn't mean shit, but UW has the potential to give your offense problems. If your RBs are getting stuffed and Mariota can't find lanes to run through, you're legitimately in trouble. You won't win by passing alone.
Meanwhile, I think Coleman/Washington are going to have a field day against your front seven. This game all comes down to the UW o-line. It's time for them to man the fuck up. If they open lanes for the RBs and give Cyler time to throw, you're toast. -
The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there. -
You're forgetting something here. In those two games Mariota was sacked 12 times. Against UCLA, zero sacks. Fisher's return seems to have reignited the O-line and Oregon is close to being back to the team it was against Michigan State. We still have Helfrich, and that's a con, but if the o-line is really back, watch out.RoadDawg55 said:The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there. -
oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're forgetting something here. In those two games Mariota was sacked 12 times. Against UCLA, zero sacks. Fisher's return seems to have reignited the O-line and Oregon is close to being back to the team it was against Michigan State. We still have Helfrich, and that's a con, but if the o-line is really back, watch out.RoadDawg55 said:The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there.
-
That is the $1,000,000 question. Did your OL look better because UCLA only has 7 sacks in 6 games? Danny Shelton has the same amount by himself. Or does Fisher actually make the OL legit? I would assume it's a bit of both. I know Fisher is solid, but if Kikaha can get pressure and sacks on Andrus Peat, I think he can get them on Fisher. He moves around too and will go against Crosby at times as well.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're forgetting something here. In those two games Mariota was sacked 12 times. Against UCLA, zero sacks. Fisher's return seems to have reignited the O-line and Oregon is close to being back to the team it was against Michigan State. We still have Helfrich, and that's a con, but if the o-line is really back, watch out.RoadDawg55 said:The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there. -
Another interesting thing will be Joe Walker. He's a beast at linebacker and played like a monster against UCLA. Our coaches really are FS if they don't unleash him on the Huskies.RoadDawg55 said:
That is the $1,000,000 question. Did your OL look better because UCLA only has 7 sacks in 6 games? Danny Shelton has the same amount by himself. Or does Fisher actually make the OL legit? I would assume it's a bit of both. I know Fisher is solid, but if Kikaha can get pressure and sacks on Andrus Peat, I think he can get them on Fisher. He moves around too and will go against Crosby at times as well.oregonblitzkrieg said:
You're forgetting something here. In those two games Mariota was sacked 12 times. Against UCLA, zero sacks. Fisher's return seems to have reignited the O-line and Oregon is close to being back to the team it was against Michigan State. We still have Helfrich, and that's a con, but if the o-line is really back, watch out.RoadDawg55 said:The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there. -
I'm kicking ass on FREE PUB!!! this week ... it's a cool week to be Tequilla brahRoadDawg55 said:The doogman posters all seem to think Oregon wins big. That alone makes me want to predict a win. I enjoy reading that a guy with 0 INT's is going to throw multiple pick 6's and it's impossible for Miles to beat Oregon, even though outstanding QB's such as Vanilla Vick and Kevin Hogan have done so. I also like seeing Ducks on this board overcompensate and act like everything is peachy after the UCLA game.
@Tequilla called it last week when he guaranteed a win because the LPT all predicted a loss. If WSU and Arizona can play with Oregon, no reason to think UW can't. Defense and coaching wins games. We have the edge there. -
Until we can prevent being boat raced in the third quarter of an Oregon game, I don't see us having much of a chance. But if this is the year we do, it will be a nail biter to the end. Since I threw away game predicting purple lens, I'm saying 34-17 Ducks. Please prove me wrong Dawgs...
