Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Plan for Pac-12 becoming a real conference again
Comments
-
I think he's more worried about climbing to the TOP of the HH leaderbored after he wakes from his wolf nap.KenND said:
Shouldn't you be losing to Arizona again or something? Oh right, that was on Thursday.oregonblitzkrieg said:No one wants to see those Notre Dame faggots in the playoffs after they got fucked by Alabama the way they did.
-
Chip Kelly.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools. -
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers. -
No, because Oregon is average now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No, because Oregon is average now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers.
2011 final Sagarin ratings:
UO- 2nd
Arizona- 64th
UCLA- 66th
WSU- 83rd
2014 prior to this week:
UO- 3rd
UCLA- 6th
Arizona- 34th
WSU- 53rd. -
Sagarin SUCKS, especially early in the season.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No, because Oregon is average now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers.
2011 final Sagarin ratings:
UO- 2nd
Arizona- 64th
UCLA- 66th
WSU- 83rd
2014 prior to this week:
UO- 3rd
UCLA- 6th
Arizona- 34th
WSU- 53rd. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sagarin SUCKS,FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No, because Oregon is average now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers.
2011 final Sagarin ratings:
UO- 2nd
Arizona- 64th
UCLA- 66th
WSU- 83rd
2014 prior to this week:
UO- 3rd
UCLA- 6th
Arizona- 34th
WSU- 53rd.especially early in the season. -
TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Sagarin SUCKS, especially early in the season.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
No, because Oregon is average now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Chip is gone, that's why Oregon is being challenged now.FremontTroll said:TierbsHsotBoobs said:
Then why is the Pac-12's playoff hope fading in the first week of October?dnc said:
No.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The net total of an upgrade using your scoring is +1.5.FremontTroll said:
Every conference loses coaches.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
The coaching drain is speaking volumes.PurpleJ said:Bring back Chip and Harbaugh. Get a real coach at USC.
It's a good start.
But the Pac has made some of the best hires in the nation the last few years. Overall the level of coaching is much improved from 3-6 years ago.
2009/2014 comparison
UW: Sark/Pete: huge improvement
WSU: Wulff/Leach: huge improvement
OSU: Riley/Riley: same
UO: Chip/Helfrich: big decline
Cal: Tedford/Dykes: small decline
Stanford: Harbaugh/Shaw: big decline
UCLA: Neuheisel/Mora: small improvement
USC: Kiffin/Sark: wash
Arizona: Stoops/RichRod: huge improvement
ASU: Erickson/Graham: small improvement
So yes the two programs that have carried the flag recently lost their elite coaches and attempted to go back to the same mold but couldn't replicate whatever element made Harbaugh and Chip winners.
But five other schools made very good hires. And after a disastrous first season Dykes has Cal playing much better in year two.
Finally- LOL USC ever and always.
Considering the fucking dreck the conference added in Colorado and Utah, it's not better off overall than it was five years ago.
But the rest of CFB is worse.
I don't think the Pac's playoff hopes are fading. Whoever wins the conference is a near lock to make the playoffs if they have 2 or fewer losses.
It is true that the conference is weaker at the top but I think its deeper. Only Stanford and USC could challenge Oregon 3-4 years ago.
If the conference has regressed its not due to coaching. I would look at recruiting first. Too many top Cali recruits committing to Oklahoma or SEC schools.
And because Arizona, WSU and UCLA (next week) are no longer complete pushovers.
2011 final Sagarin ratings:
UO- 2nd
Arizona- 64th
UCLA- 66th
WSU- 83rd
2014 prior to this week:
UO- 3rd
UCLA- 6th
Arizona- 34th
WSU- 53rd.
Then bring something else to the table other than shit opinions.
Any ranking system you can find will show the same thing: there were a number of extremely shitty teams in the Pac 3+ years ago. Arizona, ASU, UCLA, WSU...all improved massively. -
Also, 2011 Oregon would beat 2014 UCLA by 50 points. Because Chip Kelly.
