Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Softy's interview with Damon Huard.
Comments
-
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right. -
I do think Stanback's senior year he looked like a good QB especially with his clutch play. I'd go as far as saying Stanback's senior year was better than any Locker season.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right. -
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs. -
People want to move Tebow to a different position, people wanted to move Locker to a different position. Eric Bjornson was a QB at UW and was moved to WR his sophomore year then again his senior year.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
What race are they again? -
Um....yeah ya did. And why did you say he had bad coaching? Did it have to do with Garfield just having a bad QB coach, or did you say it because they were poor inner city school and didn't have the funds for a better one? We all know the answer because we read it at the time. Too bad we don't have the screen shots we need.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
Yet, no one thinks price should be a WR, but many people thought Locker should be a safety... Odd that YOU brought race into it. -
I'm hearing they are "Crazy ass white cracka's"He_Needs_More_Time said:
People want to move Tebow to a different position, people wanted to move Locker to a different position. Eric Bjornson was a QB at UW and was moved to WR his sophomore year then again his senior year.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
What race are they again? -
Southerndawg said:
I'm hearing they are "Crazy ass white cracka's"He_Needs_More_Time said:
People want to move Tebow to a different position, people wanted to move Locker to a different position. Eric Bjornson was a QB at UW and was moved to WR his sophomore year then again his senior year.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
What race are they again?
The creepy ass crackers in Dallas did move him to WR. Al and the NAACP should have asked the DOJ to sue.Southerndawg said:
I'm hearing they are "Crazy ass white cracka's"He_Needs_More_Time said:
People want to move Tebow to a different position, people wanted to move Locker to a different position. Eric Bjornson was a QB at UW and was moved to WR his sophomore year then again his senior year.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
What race are they again? -
Not to mention Garfield just hired successful Meadowdale HC and former Husky great Mark Stewert to lead their program. So if Passion was playing up the inner city too poor to afford coaches he couldn't have been more wrong.MikeDamone said:
Um....yeah ya did. And why did you say he had bad coaching? Did it have to do with Garfield just having a bad QB coach, or did you say it because they were poor inner city school and didn't have the funds for a better one? We all know the answer because we read it at the time. Too bad we don't have the screen shots we need.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
Yet, no one thinks price should be a WR, but many people thought Locker should be a safety... Odd that YOU brought race into it. -
That is bullshit.He_Needs_More_Time said:
People want to move Tebow to a different position, people wanted to move Locker to a different position. Eric Bjornson was a QB at UW and was moved to WR his sophomore year then again his senior year.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
What race are they again?
Was Tebow moved at Florida? No. Even though he can't throw a football, was he moved in Denver? No. New York? No. Stanback must've thought, "you gotta be kidding me. This guy gets a chance at QB and I don't?"
Was Locker ever moved? No.
There were a few outlying voices that wanted to move those players. That is far different than a track record of moving a certain group of people because they "don't have the intelligence to play the position." The myth that blacks in pro sports are there because they're "gifted athletically" while whites are in pro sports because "they work hard" has gone back long before any of us were born. I think you need to read a little history before saying such stupid shit.
Bjornson was moved, as was another high school QB - Jerramy Stevens. Both played in the NFL at their new positions.
-
What does Garfield's new coach have to do with the coach that was employed when Stanback was there? Silly argument.He_Needs_More_Time said:
Not to mention Garfield just hired successful Meadowdale HC and former Husky great Mark Stewert to lead their program. So if Passion was playing up the inner city too poor to afford coaches he couldn't have been more wrong.MikeDamone said:
Um....yeah ya did. And why did you say he had bad coaching? Did it have to do with Garfield just having a bad QB coach, or did you say it because they were poor inner city school and didn't have the funds for a better one? We all know the answer because we read it at the time. Too bad we don't have the screen shots we need.Passion said:
That is a lie. I never said "poor black kid from the inner city." I did, however, point to his poor high school coaching as evidence that he needed more hands-on grooming at UW, and was less developed by the time he arrived at UW.MikeDamone said:
I agreed that Stanback was the best QB. You're excuse making went into high gear when you said he was a poor black kid from the inner city who had bad coaching in high school and that was one of the reasons he wasn't as good as he could be.Passion said:
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.MikeDamone said:
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?Passion said:
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.TierbsHsotBoobs said:
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.Passion said:I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
Race only came into the equation when people wanted to put him at WR. That's the same thing that people have always wanted to do to athletic black QBs.
Yet, no one thinks price should be a WR, but many people thought Locker should be a safety... Odd that YOU brought race into it.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
