Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Softy's interview with Damon Huard.

12467

Comments

  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,413 Standard Supporter

    Passion said:



    If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.

    Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.

    Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.

    If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?

    I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.

    The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
    I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.

    In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.

  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Passion said:



    If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.

    Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.

    Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.

    If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?

    I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.

    The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
    I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.

    In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.

    That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453

    Passion said:



    If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.

    Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.

    Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.

    If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?

    I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.

    The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
    I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.

    In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.

    That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING

    It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.

    "(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."

    "(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."

    "So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"

    My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.

    I'm guessing you would have wanted James fired after going 11-11 his first two years as well.........

    They also quote former Huskies or coaches who like that coach but dismiss former players who don't.

    I remember Chorak getting pissed after the apple cup loss and doogs were attacking him. Sad they are more loyal to Sark than a guy who played and starred on the Huskies.
  • RoadDawg55
    RoadDawg55 Member Posts: 30,413 Standard Supporter

    Passion said:



    If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.

    Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.

    Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.

    If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?

    I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.

    The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
    I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.

    In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.

    That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING

    It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.

    "(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."

    "(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."

    "So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"

    My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.

    I'm guessing you would have wanted James fired after going 11-11 his first two years as well.........

    They also quote former Huskies or coaches who like that coach but dismiss former players who don't.

    I remember Chorak getting pissed after the apple cup loss and doogs were attacking him. Sad they are more loyal to Sark than a guy who played and starred on the Huskies.
    I missed the stuff with Chorak, but I'm not at all surprised.

  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622
    edited July 2013

    Passion said:

    I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.

    Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.

    The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.

    If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
    First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.

    As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).

    Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,561 Founders Club
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.

    Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.

    The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.

    If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
    First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.

    As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).

    Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
    If you can't post without personal attacks you should take a walk with your wife and get some perspective
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.

    Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.

    The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.

    If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
    First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.

    As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).

    Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
    A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?
  • Passion
    Passion Member Posts: 4,622

    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.

    Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.

    The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.

    If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
    First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.

    As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).

    Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
    A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?
    Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.

    I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    Passion said:

    Passion said:

    I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.

    Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.

    The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.

    If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
    First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.

    As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).

    Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
    Do we really need any more evidence than this to run this fuck already?