If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
Why are you acting like you are surprised? When has Softy ever interviewed a Husky/Former Husky and it not be an on air hand job?
Never said I was surprised, but admittedly I listened in case something tangible was discussed.
In my view, Softy's best moment is when he gave himself an on-air thrashing for advocating to give tyrone a 4th year. Although it was too little too late and it was the least he could do, when is the last time a member of the media actually said "I was wrong and stupid"? It actually sounded heartfelt, and like he really meant it. Again, I am NOT giving this guy a pass for all the softballs he has lobbed to coaches over the years, and his love fest with everyone around signing day's OL failures makes me barf. However, nobody else from kjr, espn radio, seattle times, pi, news tribune, everett herald would have given themselves such a beating.
PS. And you don't need to talk to me about baird. I've locked horns with him on air in a very real way.
Okay, I agree with that, but here's the problem... Did Softy learn from it and change his ways? There he was a couple years later alluding to the Half Brains by saying that the people out there who won't jump on the Sark bandwagon must have something wrong with them not to see what's going on.
Agreed. Fair enough. As I said, I'm not giving the guy a pass. Just pointing out one of his bright moments.
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
Why are you acting like you are surprised? When has Softy ever interviewed a Husky/Former Husky and it not be an on air hand job?
Never said I was surprised, but admittedly I listened in case something tangible was discussed.
In my view, Softy's best moment is when he gave himself an on-air thrashing for advocating to give tyrone a 4th year. Although it was too little too late and it was the least he could do, when is the last time a member of the media actually said "I was wrong and stupid"? It actually sounded heartfelt, and like he really meant it. Again, I am NOT giving this guy a pass for all the softballs he has lobbed to coaches over the years, and his love fest with everyone around signing day's OL failures makes me barf. However, nobody else from kjr, espn radio, seattle times, pi, news tribune, everett herald would have given themselves such a beating.
PS. And you don't need to talk to me about baird. I've locked horns with him on air in a very real way.
Okay, I agree with that, but here's the problem... Did Softy learn from it and change his ways? There he was a couple years later alluding to the Half Brains by saying that the people out there who won't jump on the Sark bandwagon must have something wrong with them not to see what's going on.
Softy learn from it? LOL Softy is pretty much all about Softy.
Softy was pissed after the Vegas Bowl and was saying we need to win 10 games this year. However that will be the exception to his norm. His job depends on him not being critical of anything UW. Meanwhile doogman has chosen to get in bed with UW & AD. As a result, the major sources for UW football outside of UW are no longer impartial nor offer constructive criticism. It's why sites like this are even more important and will naturally grow in importance.
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
Softy was pissed after the Vegas Bowl and was saying we need to win 10 games this year. However that will be the exception to his norm. His job depends on him not being critical of anything UW. Meanwhile doogman has chosen to get in bed with UW & AD. As a result, the major sources for UW football outside of UW are no longer impartial nor offer constructive criticism. It's why sites like this are even more important and will naturally grow in importance.
Softy always pulls what we call the "AuburnDoog". Which is in the offseason have great expectations then when those expectations aren't met keep moving goal posts with excuses.
I remember after the USC win, Softy saying we should be competing for a Rose Bowl by 2012. These jokers always talk a good game in the offseason but never hold the coach accountable when he fails to reach that goal.
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING
It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.
"(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."
"(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."
"So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"
My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING
It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.
"(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."
"(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."
"So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"
My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.
I'm guessing you would have wanted James fired after going 11-11 his first two years as well.........
They also quote former Huskies or coaches who like that coach but dismiss former players who don't.
I remember Chorak getting pissed after the apple cup loss and doogs were attacking him. Sad they are more loyal to Sark than a guy who played and starred on the Huskies.
If they seriously wanted to improve the show they'd boot Baird and put in someone like Lambright.
Although I'm sure they'd be afraid to have Lambo since he appears to be a straight shooter.
Hate to disappoint you, but I've heard Lambright on kjr over the years. He applauds Sark at every turn. Maybe it's because he is involved with the stadium renovation, or maybe it's because he is a good guy. Whatever the reason, he is not the critic you think.
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
I don't expect Lambright to come in and be like us as KJR won't allow it. However, after let's say the Alamo Bowl I doubt Lambo would be saying Holt should keep his job and perhaps just have a Co-DC.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I only know how bad those guys are from other poster's reports. In the past 3 years, I have probably listened to them for a total of ten minutes.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
That is why fans like Sven suggest those fucks and other doogs deserve another 0-12. They obviously learned nothing from the last 0-12. NOTHING
It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.
"(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."
"(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."
"So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"
My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.
I'm guessing you would have wanted James fired after going 11-11 his first two years as well.........
They also quote former Huskies or coaches who like that coach but dismiss former players who don't.
I remember Chorak getting pissed after the apple cup loss and doogs were attacking him. Sad they are more loyal to Sark than a guy who played and starred on the Huskies.
I missed the stuff with Chorak, but I'm not at all surprised.
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
If you can't post without personal attacks you should take a walk with your wife and get some perspective
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
A few years ago, when you're man crush and excuse making for Stanback was irrational and in high gear..that was doog behavior. Get it now?
Uhh...Stanback (if you want to relitigate) was the best QB on the team. Bonnell wasn't close. And if we had a decent QB coach at the time (better than john pettas), he would've been much better than he was...which was still pretty damn good. Ask Race Bannon if he agrees. Moreover, Isaiah put up with more shit than any QB in recent memory, and yet he never spoke ill of his coaches or fellow players.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.
I'm not posting a link because it's not worth it. Empty fluff. Nothing more.
Apparently Damon has some new role with the team where he "works with the kids" or something. Whatever. I was hoping that Softy would ask Damon about the offensive line and the recruiting of OLs. No such luck. It was all "Austin is a nice kid," and "I'm a big fan of Keith Price" emptiness.
The only takeaway for me is the question of how I can get those 6 minutes of my life back.
If you listen to the King of the Doogs, you're likely a Doog.
First of all, maybe it's because I'm relatively new here, but I don't know what a "doog" is. If it's a doucheman.com fan, the term doesn't apply. I was booted off the site (permanently) and given more timeouts than I care to remember. Why? Because I told kim he has small man's disease (for not allowing dissent), and because I told eklund that he should be selling insurance.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
Do we really need any more evidence than this to run this fuck already?
Comments
If you really wanted a straight shooter, get a former player who doesn't give a rip. How about Donald Jones? He lives on the east coast, so he doesn't have to see any of these people, and his son was just jerked around during recruiting?
LOL
Softy is pretty much all about Softy.
However that will be the exception to his norm. His job depends on him not being critical of anything UW. Meanwhile doogman has chosen to get in bed with UW & AD. As a result, the major sources for UW football outside of UW are no longer impartial nor offer constructive criticism. It's why sites like this are even more important and will naturally grow in importance.
The Honks show is hopeless anyways as they are all Sark ball sniffers including Hugh. Why anyone with 1/4 of a brain still listens to that garbage I don't know.
I remember after the USC win, Softy saying we should be competing for a Rose Bowl by 2012. These jokers always talk a good game in the offseason but never hold the coach accountable when he fails to reach that goal.
In those ten minutes, I heard a bunch of bullshit, homer analysis and Hugh Millen yelling, " I want to see Sark coach in the new Husky Stadium!" He repeated this 3 or 4 times. He must have thought he was making a good point. There was not one critical word about coaching even though we had just gotten plunger raped by LSU.
It is alarming that there are fans who have learned nothing. We will hear or have already heard the same excuses for Sark that we heard for Ty.
"(Hugh Millen/ Rick Redmond/ Shaun Alexander), who knows way more about football than any of us, supports (Sark/Ty)."
"(Sark/Ty) inherited a terrible team after (Ty/ Gilby/ Rick). You don't understand all the damage that was done."
"So we should just fire every coach that doesn't win a national championship right away?!!!???"
My personal favorite doog/cunty response to criticizing the coach is, "If you know so much about coaching, why don't you put on a headset yourself!" Anyone who says this truly deserves to die in a fire.
They also quote former Huskies or coaches who like that coach but dismiss former players who don't.
I remember Chorak getting pissed after the apple cup loss and doogs were attacking him. Sad they are more loyal to Sark than a guy who played and starred on the Huskies.
As far as listening to Softy's podcasts, the only time I listen to the guy is if he is interviewing somebody affiliated with Husky Football (Rondeau, one of the coaches, a player, etc.). Believe it or not, I still love this program and try to obtain information (after sifting through whatever BS is spewed on the air, of course).
Lastly, I may not know what a "doog" is, but I know a whiny finger-pointing bitch when I see one. You and "he_needs_more_time" (the sidekick who "likes" all your posts) should spend less time giving each other dirty sanchez's, and more time offering some constructive dialogue. Try linking a news story once in a while, or an interview, or writing some worthwhile commentary. All you do is sit back, criticize other posters, try to offer 'witty' zingers (which aren't all that witty)...oh yah, and lick each others' balls.
I wasn't making excuses for Stanback, I was disagreeing with you. There is a difference, unless you're somebody who always things he's right.