Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Jobless Claims 187,000

124678

Comments

  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam

    HuskyBuck said:


    “What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.

    I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?

    Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.

    No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.
    It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!
    Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.

    In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.

  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,992 Standard Supporter
    HuskyBuck said:

    HuskyBuck said:


    “What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.

    I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?

    Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.

    No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.
    It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!
    Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.

    In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.

    Well at least you admit those jobs were here before and therefore disagree with your brain-dead party and President whom refer to them as "new jobs" they "created."

    Lurk a little longer and you might become smarter and more credible.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,813 Swaye's Wigwam
    HuskyBuck said:

    HuskyBuck said:


    “What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.

    I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?

    Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.

    No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.
    It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!
    Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.

    In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.

    I thought you didn't deal in hypothetical? Just FACTS.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 16,813 Swaye's Wigwam
    pawz said:

    @HuskyBuck doesn't remember any enforced lockdowns.



    But yeah, shut down/destroy the economy and destroy millions of jobs(which haven't been recovered to-date) then claim "job creation!" when some of those jobs come back.

    Hysterics about hypotheticals incoming.

    It's almost sad this must be pointed out. But the BidenBros are a stubbornly stupid bunch.
    Indoctrination. Cable news, legacy media, education.



    “It’s easier to fool somebody than convince them they’ve been fooled.” -Nitzchke

    This regime is convinced that "the narrative" is all that matters and not objective reality.

    Bidenbros are proof their concept has merit if all you care about is remaining in power.

    It appeared that there had even been demonstrations to thank the Big Guy for reducing the unemployment rate to 7%. And only yesterday, he reflected, it had been announced that the unemployment rate was to be REDUCED to 3.5%. Was it possible that they could swallow that, after only twenty-four hours? Yes, they swallowed it.
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2024
    I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%. I’m sorry you dont like the way its ALWAYS been calculated, even under Trump.

    Answer me this. What was the real unemployment rate under Trump’s best month? 3.5? What do you think the real unemployment rate is right now?
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam

    HuskyBuck said:

    I mean…..theyre thanking him for reducing it to 3.5% because…..it IS 3.5%

    After the dems made them unemployed in the first place...and as long as you don't count the 6 million long term unemployed(which the BLS does as we already went over).

    You just don't like facts I suppose.

    Fucking hondofs. Even Susan had the good sense to abandon ship. Even Brandon abandoned this talking point. Bidenomics is DOA. Let it go.


    So do you have the real unemployment number or what???
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,251 Standard Supporter
    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam
    I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam
    edited January 2024
    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 109,604 Founders Club
    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
    Why so angry?
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,251 Standard Supporter
    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
    Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam
    Sledog said:

    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
    Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?
    That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!

    Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,251 Standard Supporter
    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
    Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?
    That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!

    Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL
    I normally do. But you don't read it or you would know better regarding the election that was stolen.
  • HuskyBuckHuskyBuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,295 Swaye's Wigwam


    Yup still no proof. Lots of excuses though. LOTS of excuses.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,865 Founders Club
    HuskyBuck said:

    HuskyBuck said:


    “What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.

    I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?

    Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.

    No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.
    It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!
    Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.

    In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.

    coming back, after mostly Dimocrats took them away over a cold

  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,865 Founders Club
    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    HuskyBuck said:

    Sledog said:

    All on the Obama count plan they simply remove people from the roll. Then it doesn't look s bad.

    Lol im sure you have proof that this happened dont you SheDog? You’d never talk out of your ass! Those missing people on the Obama count are in the same place as the missing Georgia votes right? heh heh
    Look around HuskyFuck. You should be able to find it. Is your daddy an attorney?
    That’s right! I’m here to Fuck, you know damn right SheDog!

    Back to your post, yeah it’s weird you can never produce evidence of the stuff you spout out. I’m the one who has to prove what you say is true.LOLOLOL
    Please tell me you're under 30
  • BleachedAnusDawgBleachedAnusDawg Member Posts: 12,347
    HuskyBuck said:

    I knew it! Doog Bot ran away when asked what the real unemployment rate right now!!!!

    Educate yourself on how unemployment figures are calculated and who they don't include, but should.

    https://www.cnet.com/personal-finance/low-unemployment-statistics-are-misleading-economic-hardship-is-much-worse/
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,992 Standard Supporter

    HuskyBuck said:

    HuskyBuck said:


    “What hypothetical? Why was unemployment and participation that low from the 2019 high”.

    I dont know, but all I know whatever it was happened under Trump’s watch. but notice, I did an apples to apples comparison about Trumps improvement of that rate from 2017 when he took office to when it reached that 2019 high? You did notice I didn’t try to trick and blame Trump for it being at the 61.5 where Biden found it at right? You noticed that?

    Based on how you guys are making your arguments in here, thats certainly something some of the idiots in here like the Duck fans would have tried to do.

    No, you just intentionally ignored the effect of the blue state and blue city lockdowns on the small business private sector economy by your side. In March of 2020 record growth in real wages that then went into the shitter with the blue lockdowns. Again by your side. Not having record increase in real wages today and the future looks poor under dem rule. I've asked you to list your team economic policies that have created what you think is a great economy. For some reason, you have failed to do so.
    It was funnier when he wouldn't say it, let me cook Race!
    Atta boy! Name call when the data doesn’t back up what you say. In your world the jobs never came back and people are looking for stale bread on the street.

    In reality, the jobs have been coming back at a faster rate than Trump grew them. Every single economic indicator I can point out besides inflation is a positive. If Trump was in office, you’d be praising the economy right now based on those metrics. All of you should be richer, unless you went to the Sugar Bowl when you can’t afford it and then started to blame someone else! But, it doesn’t fit your narrative so you need to resort to political hackery. And when you get called out for it, you resort to name calling.

    coming back, after mostly Dimocrats took them away over a cold

    And he wants people to think he's smart.
Sign In or Register to comment.