Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

FIFITA AND McMillan!!!!!

17891012

Comments

  • HouhuskyHouhusky Member Posts: 5,537

    gmo said:

    gmo said:

    Assuming Rogers stays, all the pieces are there for a good offense besides the offensive line (which is a big besides).

    If Fisch is who he thinks he is, he makes that a focus in the portal and gets at least one of Buelow/Kalepo to come back.

    Is Mele playing or is he having to medically retire? Brailsford wasn't even supposed to be the starter. Same with one of the guards, Memelord was gonna start.

    how about that run defense? Well defense overall?


    Defense will be fine if we can portal in 1-2 more studs on the DL.

    Last I heard the ASU and Montana State guys are still committed? They are good.
    I really hope that you are right.
    By "fine", I mean good enough to go 8-4 or so.

    I'm not expecting to contend for the playoffs in year 1 with Fisch.
    BJ’s taking visits else where. He gone. I bet.
    BJ never enrolled like he was supposed to... Maybe UW academics fucked it, maybe lost in the bama staff shuffle... He has been completely silent, either way 81% chance he is gone
  • WoolleyDoogWoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 3,588 Swaye's Wigwam

    dannarc said:

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.


    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - W
    at Rutgers - W
    Michigan - Toss Up
    at Iowa - Toss Up
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - W
    at Oregon - L


    UW finds a way to win one of the toss up games, loses a game it should win, and voila 8-4.

    At this point in time I cannot predict a UW loss at home. Huskeieieiei stadium is a hell of a home field advantage. Michigan is losing a ton of production and will also be a very different looking team.

    It's definitely doable depending on the transfers that we reel in via the portal

    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - L(B1G version of Cal, we always lose to NW... 13-7 type game)
    at Rutgers - L ( Rutgers is not the Rutgers of 2020)
    Michigan - W (paybacks a biatch)
    at Iowa - L(Why can't we stop the f'n run)
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - L
    at Oregon - L


    6-6 and bowel eligible! Winning the JoAnns Thread the Needle Bowl will be special especially when half our roster sits out
    Rutgers still sucks. They are not good.

    If this was @ NW I would agree, but we should be able to get by them at home.
    Predicting wins over Michigan and USC and losses to Northwestern and Rutgers is special.
  • bigccbigcc Member Posts: 896
    Doogles said:

    bigcc said:

    Winning 8 games next year is the floor, the roster will be just fine come August.

    Yup

    Ptsd doogs are retarded
    Ptsd?

    Lmao, bro I ask again, name 3 starters between the offense and defense

    You literally have no fucking clue what fisch can put together outside of missing his own qb/wr
    You are like the guy in fantasy football freaking out going into the final game down by 25 with a projected 75 points to go.

    LIPO you screechy fuck.

    All UW has done in the last year is prove it cares again from the administration on down. We're not rolling over and dying.
    I don't disagree in the slightest

    Just think it's retarded to claim 8-4 minimum because Michigan and Iowa are iffy

    Because at the current state of the roster it's literally retarded to make such a doog claim
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 15,780 Swaye's Wigwam

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.

    Nobody even knows who the qb will be let alonewhat the rest of the roster is going to look like maybe LIPO.
    Tsio.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,270

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.


    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - W
    at Rutgers - W
    Michigan - Toss Up
    at Iowa - Toss Up
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - W
    at Oregon - L


    UW finds a way to win one of the toss up games, loses a game it should win, and voila 8-4.

    At this point in time I cannot predict a UW loss at home. Huskeieieiei stadium is a hell of a home field advantage. Michigan is losing a ton of production and will also be a very different looking team.

    It's definitely doable depending on the transfers that we reel in via the portal
    Care to make a wager on 8.4?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,082 Swaye's Wigwam
    thechatch said:

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.


    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - W
    at Rutgers - W
    Michigan - Toss Up
    at Iowa - Toss Up
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - W
    at Oregon - L


    UW finds a way to win one of the toss up games, loses a game it should win, and voila 8-4.

    At this point in time I cannot predict a UW loss at home. Huskeieieiei stadium is a hell of a home field advantage. Michigan is losing a ton of production and will also be a very different looking team.

    It's definitely doable depending on the transfers that we reel in via the portal
    Care to make a wager on 8.4?
    Yes


    But not with you
  • bigccbigcc Member Posts: 896

    thechatch said:

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.


    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - W
    at Rutgers - W
    Michigan - Toss Up
    at Iowa - Toss Up
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - W
    at Oregon - L


    UW finds a way to win one of the toss up games, loses a game it should win, and voila 8-4.

    At this point in time I cannot predict a UW loss at home. Huskeieieiei stadium is a hell of a home field advantage. Michigan is losing a ton of production and will also be a very different looking team.

    It's definitely doable depending on the transfers that we reel in via the portal
    Care to make a wager on 8.4?
    Yes


    But not with you
    Me?

    Seriously pick me
  • TurdBomberTurdBomber Member Posts: 19,964 Standard Supporter

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.

    Nobody even knows who the qb will be let alonewhat the rest of the roster is going to look like maybe LIPO.
    Tsio.
    @FireFischDawg, True?
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,082 Swaye's Wigwam
    bigcc said:

    thechatch said:

    I’m struggling to find 8 wins on the schedule.


    Weber State - W
    Eastern Michigan - W
    WSU - W
    Northwestern - W
    at Rutgers - W
    Michigan - Toss Up
    at Iowa - Toss Up
    at Indiana - W
    USC - W
    at Penn State - L
    UCLA - W
    at Oregon - L


    UW finds a way to win one of the toss up games, loses a game it should win, and voila 8-4.

    At this point in time I cannot predict a UW loss at home. Huskeieieiei stadium is a hell of a home field advantage. Michigan is losing a ton of production and will also be a very different looking team.

    It's definitely doable depending on the transfers that we reel in via the portal
    Care to make a wager on 8.4?
    Yes


    But not with you
    Me?

    Seriously pick me
    sure.gif
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,270
    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?
  • OreDawgOreDawg Member Posts: 656
    thechatch said:

    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?

    No, but once will rogers pulls himself out of the portal im sure Ektard will make that claim.
  • EsophagealFecesEsophagealFeces Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 12,089 Swaye's Wigwam

    thechatch said:

    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?

    After Fisch left, he called a players only meeting and made demands to the AD to either hire Brennan Carroll or Johnny Nansen as HC.

    After Carroll left, and they demanded they hire Nansen as HC.

    Then the AD hired Brennan as HC, so they demanded Nansen be DC.

    Now, they've hired Akina as DC.

    If he likes getting ignored by the AD 4 times, then WDWHA
    I hadn’t heard that. That’s wild
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,895 Founders Club
    My neighbor ca. 2008 used to say Lopez would hire cartel types to intimidate people. CSB.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,270

    thechatch said:

    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?

    After Fisch left, he called a players only meeting and made demands to the AD to either hire Brennan Carroll or Johnny Nansen as HC.

    After Carroll left, and they demanded they hire Nansen as HC.

    Then the AD hired Brennan as HC, so they demanded Nansen be DC.

    Now, they've hired Akina as DC.

    If he likes getting ignored by the AD 4 times, then WDWHA
    It sounds like Fisch likes Rogers better anyway and wanted him to be the guy all along.

    /Ecklund
  • dirtysouwfdawgdirtysouwfdawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,048 Swaye's Wigwam
    thechatch said:

    thechatch said:

    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?

    After Fisch left, he called a players only meeting and made demands to the AD to either hire Brennan Carroll or Johnny Nansen as HC.

    After Carroll left, and they demanded they hire Nansen as HC.

    Then the AD hired Brennan as HC, so they demanded Nansen be DC.

    Now, they've hired Akina as DC.

    If he likes getting ignored by the AD 4 times, then WDWHA
    It sounds like Fisch likes Rogers better anyway and wanted him to be the guy all along.

    /Ecklund
    So the couple opposite is true and Roger’s is gone. Got it.
  • thechatchthechatch Member Posts: 6,270

    thechatch said:

    thechatch said:

    Re: Fifita

    Have we gotten to WDWHA from Ecklund yet?

    After Fisch left, he called a players only meeting and made demands to the AD to either hire Brennan Carroll or Johnny Nansen as HC.

    After Carroll left, and they demanded they hire Nansen as HC.

    Then the AD hired Brennan as HC, so they demanded Nansen be DC.

    Now, they've hired Akina as DC.

    If he likes getting ignored by the AD 4 times, then WDWHA
    It sounds like Fisch likes Rogers better anyway and wanted him to be the guy all along.

    /Ecklund
    So the couple opposite is true and Roger’s is gone. Got it.
    Probably.

    Looks like it’s Teddy time.
Sign In or Register to comment.