Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Me So Horny

135

Comments

  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2014

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    You realize how fucking ridiculous it is for you to say that right? Remember when we argued over single parents and you hadn't read a single paper one the issue? When I asked you to back up your claims you linked an insane mens rights website that had ties to a holocaust denial website.

    OBK is a dope. You are intelligent. But you're not interested in doing the research either. You like to know just enough to confirm your position, not the bigger picture.
    No. Because I've read serval papers on the issue. I think I started with some words from Don Lemon. That issue is well documented and researched. Anyway. Sounds like we are in agreement over the hunting thing and OBK.
  • AZDuck
    AZDuck Member Posts: 15,381
    Weird face. Can not fap to this.

    image
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    I still see MANY sites listing them as threatened, not endangered. Plenty of "threatened" species are hunted by game tag to manage a healthy population.

    The PETA people and the hunting conservation people have their positions clearly staked out, and nobody will budge. So fuck it. Believe whatever the fuck you want. I could give a shit. I will continue to hunt anything I want as long is it is on an officially purchased and legal game tag. The end.

    Back on point, I would bang this chick enthusiastically. Nice to see a hot chick shouldering a man's rifle. And for anyone who has not shot a .416 Rigby, you should. You haven't lived until you have the equivalent of 6 30-30 rifles recoil at once. BAM! The PETA folks will need bite a pillow on their bed before they do it. A big one.

  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,152 Founders Club
    AZDuck said:

    Weird face. Can not fap to this.

    image


    Huh? I think the dead zebra has a nice face. Kind of weird thing to jack off to, but whatever pops your cork brother.

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    GIVE ME MAH FIDDY-TREE SECONDS BITCHES
  • SweatpantsGeneral
    SweatpantsGeneral Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 2,152 Founders Club

    GIVE ME MAH FIDDY-TREE SECONDS BITCHES

    I love you, I hate you....you may complete me.

  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    koopdog said:

    GIVE ME MAH FIDDY-TREE SECONDS BITCHES

    I love you, I hate you....you may complete me.

    image
    ... ?
  • GrundleStiltzkin
    GrundleStiltzkin Member Posts: 61,516 Standard Supporter
    Swaye said:

    HH: Where man love is allowed to blossom but soccer talk is discouraged.

    Huh?
    image
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
  • PurpleJ
    PurpleJ Member Posts: 37,643 Founders Club
    Swaye said:

    HH: Where man love is allowed to blossom but soccer talk is discouraged.

    If we're gonna bash man love, I'm OUT!!!
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    TheGlove said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
    That's not what the article said...but still
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346

    TheGlove said:

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    BOOM. Roasted.
    That's not what the article said...but still
    I know your being sarkastic but I don't read articles.

    HTH
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    What part of culling the animals with the best genes (the trophy animals) is destructive to conservation do you not understand? It's quaint how you're always patting yourself on the back, thinking you've won every argument and have the correct position on everything. Everyone but you is uniformed. The intellectual steed that you ride is the highest horse on the bored. At least in your own mind...

    image
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    dnc said:

    I like to reference irrelevant posts on irrelevant threads because I don't have any firepower left in the barrel.
    I like to accuse others of running out of firepower when I didn't have any firepower to begin with.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    In this thread you're just a curiosity, a sideline gawker that speaks in lingo. I don't get half of what you're saying.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    You realize how fucking ridiculous it is for you to say that right? Remember when we argued over single parents and you hadn't read a single paper one the issue? When I asked you to back up your claims you linked an insane mens rights website that had ties to a holocaust denial website.

    OBK is a dope. You are intelligent. But you're not interested in doing the research either. You like to know just enough to confirm your position, not the bigger picture.
    So far you've provided nothing in this thread so why are you even here? You're gay right, wouldn't you rather be pounding your boyfriend in the ass? You're merely here to suck Damone's dick. You're doing a good job of it, but it makes you look foolish.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    What part of culling the animals with the best genes (the trophy animals) is destructive to conservation do you not understand? It's quaint how you're always patting yourself on the back, thinking you've won every argument and have the correct position on everything. Everyone but you is uniformed. The intellectual steed that you ride is the highest horse on the bored. At least in your own mind...

    image
    No everyone is uninformed, just you and a couple others. Maybe not so much uninformed, but not very good at thinking critically and a bit deeper.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    OZONE said:

    OZONE said:

    Swaye said:

    I think it's pretty cool. And for all you split tails whining, they give game tags to keep the population healthy. It isn't a fucking free for all. But don't let facts get in the way of a good Greenpeace rant.

    Bullshit. They sell game tags to rich foreigners to line their corrupt pockets.

    But don't let the facts get in the way of a good NRA rant.
    Boom. Mother fucking fatality.
    So you didn't do any reading or research. Good to know. Gotta love bumper sticker activism.

    Seriously. You really don't care about increasing healthy populations of these species. All you care about is how you are perceived by other shallow people who don't take the time to really understand problems and their solutions.

    There is so much unbiased research out there it's embarrassing you would argue this shit.

    This is obviously from an NRA shrill:

    environmentmagazine.org/Archives/Back%20Issues/2011/July-August%202011/exploitation-or-conservation-full.html

    There is work to be done and it's not perfect, but overall, the economic and environmental benefits of trophy hunting certainly outweigh the negatives.
    Hey look, you found a publication with a circulation of 3000 that supports your view that imperialist owned hunting ranches in Africa are good for the "environment".

    Holy fuck.

    You probably also think this is a good example of free enterprise and "capitalism".

    How stupid are you?
    There are many unbiased articles on this topic. Your use of a trite logical fallacy is no surprise here. A thinking person can easily see that hunting can enhance conservation. But some of you Fucktards have trouble thinking beyond the "poor animal". It's not that hard to figure out. Give it a try.

    OBK still won't do the research. He'd rather simply hang on to his uninformed opinion.

    I don't own guns or hunt and do find it distasteful, but looking at the bigger picture the benefits outweigh that.
    You realize how fucking ridiculous it is for you to say that right? Remember when we argued over single parents and you hadn't read a single paper one the issue? When I asked you to back up your claims you linked an insane mens rights website that had ties to a holocaust denial website.

    OBK is a dope. You are intelligent. But you're not interested in doing the research either. You like to know just enough to confirm your position, not the bigger picture.
    So far you've provided nothing in this thread so why are you even here? You're gay right, wouldn't you rather be pounding your boyfriend in the ass? You're merely here to suck Damone's dick. You're doing a good job of it, but it makes you look foolish.
    Stay in the kiddie pool OBK, you're in way over your head here.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014
    You're annoying because to dispute you one must first read through the lengthy articles you post, which I assume are your positions. I actually read this one all the way through. I may have to change my position because the logic makes sense. But I don't believe the endangered species trophy hunters themselves really give a shit about conservation. They are just bastard fucks with money to burn. But if their money can be taken from them and used to do the opposite of what their dirty work accomplishes - increase the population of an endangered species by making it economically lucrative for the locals to participate in their preservation, it may be better in the long run, as long as the rhinos don't become like cattle that are 'owned' by individuals. But it doesn't change my disdain for individuals like this attention seeking whore who glorifies the killing of these animals.

    And APAG is just a chimp who rides on your bandwagon.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781

    You're annoying because to dispute you one must first read through the lengthy articles you post, which I assume are your positions. I actually read this one all the way through. I may have to change my position because the logic makes sense. But I don't believe the endangered species trophy hunters themselves really give a shit about conservation. They are just bastard fucks with money to burn. But if their money can be taken from them and used to do the opposite of what their dirty work accomplishes - increase the population of an endangered species by making it economically lucrative for the locals to participate in their preservation, it may be better in the long run, as long as the rhinos don't become like cattle that are 'owned' by individuals. But it doesn't change my disdain for individuals like this attention seeking whore who glorifies the killing of these animals.

    And APAG is just a chimp who rides on your bandwagon.
    At least you're willing to change your mind when you get some info. That's all I'm trying to help you with.

    Some trophy hunters probably do give a shit about conservation and some probably don't. Calling them "rich bastards" makes you sound jealous and petty. Stop that.

    I have said all along I distain killing the animals, but can look past that to see the how it can be used. Yes, it would be best for the animals if there were no people around at all to fuck with them..but that ship has sailed. I find it very arrogant to sit over here in the USA and think that people who are poorer than the poorest persons we have ever seen in this country need to cater to our sensibilities.

    And I think you misread APAG.
  • BennyBeaver
    BennyBeaver Member Posts: 13,346
    While I don't agree with killing these amazing creatures for "sport," I'm not going to pass judgment on the countries, municipalities, etc for doing what they judge is "best" with their resources.

    I am going to pass judgment on the cunt in these photos. While I'd gladly give her a pounding with my 2" of thunder, she needs to DIAFF. Media whore cunt.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    TheGlove said:

    While I don't agree with killing these amazing creatures for "sport," I'm not going to pass judgment on the countries, municipalities, etc for doing what they judge is "best" with their resources.

    I am going to pass judgment on the cunt in these photos. While I'd gladly give her a pounding with my 2" of thunder, she needs to DIAFF. Media whore cunt.

    You sound a outraged. Does this have legs? Who the fuck cares? First world problems. You'll be over it soon when the next thing the media puts in front of you to fire you up.
  • oregonblitzkrieg
    oregonblitzkrieg Member Posts: 15,288
    edited July 2014

    TheGlove said:

    While I don't agree with killing these amazing creatures for "sport," I'm not going to pass judgment on the countries, municipalities, etc for doing what they judge is "best" with their resources.

    I am going to pass judgment on the cunt in these photos. While I'd gladly give her a pounding with my 2" of thunder, she needs to DIAFF. Media whore cunt.

    You sound a outraged. Does this have legs? Who the fuck cares? First world problems. You'll be over it soon when the next thing the media a bored troll puts in front of you to fire you up.
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited July 2014
    One more thing. Did you find teachers or professors "annoying" when they asked you to read and do research in order to support your conclusions?
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781


    TheGlove said:

    While I don't agree with killing these amazing creatures for "sport," I'm not going to pass judgment on the countries, municipalities, etc for doing what they judge is "best" with their resources.

    I am going to pass judgment on the cunt in these photos. While I'd gladly give her a pounding with my 2" of thunder, she needs to DIAFF. Media whore cunt.

    You sound a outraged. Does this have legs? Who the fuck cares? First world problems. You'll be over it soon when the next thing the media a bored troll puts in front of you to fire you up.
    You're free to ignore it.