Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
And how is America or any other empire that followed not doomed?
Repeating the same mistakes seems dumb but PGOS don't care bro
They are. It's inevitable. I just don't see how you put the genie back in the bottle. AI does, admittedly, have great potential for good and bad, but we've? struggled with progress since the dawn of time.
I'm not joking when I say that the thing you point out, which is valid and true, is a chunk of the Marx emphasis on capitalism just eating itself up. Sure, the existence of the Manifesto makes it seem as though he thought revolution and overthrow was the way to go. But his more in-depth works in Kapital and German Ideology make it pretty clear that he thought a good run through capitalism was a necessary predicate to making a real run at "true socialism", or whatever, and one of the reasons for that is he admired capitalism's inherent ability to raise the standard of living and deal with scarcity. He also thought, or dreamed when he was high maybe, that the technological advances that capitalism would give us would free us from scarcity and allow us to all self-actualize.
Where I'm sure you and he part company is on the idea that work and struggle give human beings purpose and thus it is the very struggle to work and create that makes us human. After all, we can't all sit around naval gazing and painting water lilies with all of our free time after being liberated from the fetters of labor.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
All empires are doomed. But they are doomed for a reason. “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” When you won't defend yourself, but rely on other to defend you, then at some point there is going to be a fail. We are deep into the bread and circus phase with tens of millions bought off and unable to take care of themselves, let along family and country. A nation of dazzlers, mello and AOG can't stand.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
And how is America or any other empire that followed not doomed?
Repeating the same mistakes seems dumb but PGOS don't care bro
They are. It's inevitable. I just don't see how you put the genie back in the bottle. AI does, admittedly, have great potential for good and bad, but we've? struggled with progress since the dawn of time.
I'm not joking when I say that the thing you point out, which is valid and true, is a chunk of the Marx emphasis on capitalism just eating itself up. Sure, the existence of the Manifesto makes it seem as though he thought revolution and overthrow was the way to go. But his more in-depth works in Kapital and German Ideology make it pretty clear that he thought a good run through capitalism was a necessary predicate to making a real run at "true socialism", or whatever, and one of the reasons for that is he admired capitalism's inherent ability to raise the standard of living and deal with scarcity. He also thought, or dreamed when he was high maybe, that the technological advances that capitalism would give us would free us from scarcity and allow us to all self-actualize.
Where I'm sure you and he part company is on the idea that work and struggle give human beings purpose and thus it is the very struggle to work and create that makes us human. After all, we can't all sit around naval gazing and painting water lilies with all of our free time after being liberated from the fetters of labor.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
And how is America or any other empire that followed not doomed?
Repeating the same mistakes seems dumb but PGOS don't care bro
They are. It's inevitable. I just don't see how you put the genie back in the bottle. AI does, admittedly, have great potential for good and bad, but we've? struggled with progress since the dawn of time.
I'm not joking when I say that the thing you point out, which is valid and true, is a chunk of the Marx emphasis on capitalism just eating itself up. Sure, the existence of the Manifesto makes it seem as though he thought revolution and overthrow was the way to go. But his more in-depth works in Kapital and German Ideology make it pretty clear that he thought a good run through capitalism was a necessary predicate to making a real run at "true socialism", or whatever, and one of the reasons for that is he admired capitalism's inherent ability to raise the standard of living and deal with scarcity. He also thought, or dreamed when he was high maybe, that the technological advances that capitalism would give us would free us from scarcity and allow us to all self-actualize.
Where I'm sure you and he part company is on the idea that work and struggle give human beings purpose and thus it is the very struggle to work and create that makes us human. After all, we can't all sit around naval gazing and painting water lilies with all of our free time after being liberated from the fetters of labor.
I like this
Another description for having skin in the game. A majority of people need purpose and a sense of accomplishment. Socialists don't seem to learn that handouts don't work, whether it's housing, stimmy checks, loan forgiveness, etc.
Cue the 'but true socialism hasn't been tried yet' crowd
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
All empires are doomed. But they are doomed for a reason. “Hard times create strong men, strong men create good times, good times create weak men, and weak men create hard times.” When you won't defend yourself, but rely on other to defend you, then at some point there is going to be a fail. We are deep into the bread and circus phase with tens of millions bought off and unable to take care of themselves, let along family and country. A nation of dazzlers, mello and AOG can't stand.
That's basically my point. One argument for Rome's fall was it tried to be too much, and the expansion to the east killed "real Rome." Who the fuck really knows. When they were at their best, they were off conquering and building an economy that exploited the resources of the empire as far as it stretched. Rather than scorched earth, they converted the locals to the Roman way and convinced them of the bennies of being a Roman citizen, a status which they freely conferred to those whom they just bent over. This lead of course to a standard of living previously unimagined in the ancient world.
I guess what I'm saying is that it's a parallel to us and our system of economy. Whether a public company reporting to Wall Street or a PE play answering to its limited partners, you are never done growing and expanding and creating value. You can't grow a company into profitability and say, "Ok, that's enough. It's sustainable. We're stopping here." America is great because of private property and the freedom to do well and the demand in our system that to succeed you have to create value. There is nothing in the soil, divine provenance is a stupid notion, and we don't have a better gene pool ... it's just those things. We adopted the British idea of capitalism, pumped it full of steroids consisting of the natural resources and undeveloped markets of the new world, and other shit I don't understand, and were lucky enough to devise a political system that helped all that along. Now we have yet another example of American ingenuity and value creation. The car displaced all the people connected with horses and carriages, the lamplighter lost his job with electricity, etc. etc.
When is too much too much? Nobody really knows. But human beings are never going to say no to anything that makes life easier.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
And how is America or any other empire that followed not doomed?
Repeating the same mistakes seems dumb but PGOS don't care bro
Im hearing America is like Rome and the machines are gonna kill us all. Bodies stacked like cordwood.
Maybe the machines will do us a solid and stack the bodies at Lumen Field
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
Notable expert on everything heard from.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the world is ending, but to argue that the US will endure forever is asinine. Regardless of whatever you consider complacency to mean
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
My take is that the expansion spread them too thin, including by administration. Rome as an empire didn't work with two emperors. Rome in its last stages, the real Rome, had become a second class citizen to Rome East. It was a bridge too far and they blew their wad in establishing Constantinople as the other Rome. It was destined to fail.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
We seem to be channeling some bad Roman Emperors. Having a dementia patient as president seems to bear a resemblance to a horse as a Roman Consul.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
My take is that the expansion spread them too thin, including by administration. Rome as an empire didn't work with two emperors. Rome in its last stages, the real Rome, had become a second class citizen to Rome East. It was a bridge too far and they blew their wad in establishing Constantinople as the other Rome. It was destined to fail.
I know you're being sarcastic, but that's Istanbul
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
And try to expand the empire into the east as far as they did.
If every Roman Emperor was similar to Augustus, we'd still be living in Rome
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
Notable expert on everything heard from.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the world is ending, but to argue that the US will endure forever is asinine. Regardless of whatever you consider complacency to mean
Aliens scare me more than AI. Tuff to beat the hive mind fleet that appears on the edge of the solarsystem
We can't know the future, but the hypotheticals about AI are funny.
Society has markedly improved in damn near every way over the last 100 years of vast technological innovation.
The Tug wouldve been bitching about horse breeders losing their jobs at Henry Ford, and it wouldve been bitching about OSHA laws limiting children in the coal mines. How can the mines remain profitable?!?!?!?!
Society evolves.
You guys are like the climate kooks thinking the world will be underwater unless we go vegan. Just on the other end of the spectrum.
Also - no one here knows shit about fuck. Aint an expert in sight. Which is why its fun
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
Doesn't help when you give away all your war fighting equipment either.
Rome had an idle population and how did that work out? At the end they didn't have the will to defend themselves. Sounds familiar. We will pay money we don't have to defend a border 4600 miles away, but won't even pretend to defend our own southern border. Then we are happy to provide bread and circuses to the invaders. Idle hands are the devil's workshop. If you won't work to earn a living but expect someone else to provide for you, you aren't living, you are just existing.
Rome was always going to fall. If it wasn't that (and I'm not sure it was entirely or mostly that), it would have been something else. Rome was born of high stakes betrayal. Romulus killed Remus over an argument about where to begin the building of Rome. Even at its very beginning, one brother killed another to hold @Swaye over Rome. The city was constantly ebbing and flowing for the better and for the worse over political rivalry and skulduggery. Rome was doomed from the start. But what a fucking empire it was, eh?
Rome was also complacent and didnt have better military tech than the competition
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
Doesn't help when you give away all your war fighting equipment either.
The US has given Ukraine lots of older artillery equipment, old Bradleys, and old Abrams
All of these models are scheduled to be replaced.
The thing that matters most if you are the United States is the Air Force and the Navy. These are the real teeth of the military. There is no peer to the F-22 or the F-35.
Many military experts believe the F-16 is better than anything Russia can field, and especially China.
Additionally, the naval equipment is vastly superior. The US has over a dozen carrier groups. China sort of has 1, and Russia can't even take their dilapidated POS out to sea.
The only thing China has that is at all decent is their anti-ship missles. No one knows how good those are and how well a carrier group with submarine support would do against them. And we will more than 99.99% likely never find out.
The US does not want to invade Russia or China, so who really gives a shit about artillery? The US will be fine and can produce shells at a decent clip if needed.
Tldr, the Air Force and Navy is the real imperial force. Not the javelin infantry launcher or some old ass humvees
Comments
Legions were great. Then everyone else caught up.
Doesn't help when you have dozens of civil wars all the time, either.
I'm not joking when I say that the thing you point out, which is valid and true, is a chunk of the Marx emphasis on capitalism just eating itself up. Sure, the existence of the Manifesto makes it seem as though he thought revolution and overthrow was the way to go. But his more in-depth works in Kapital and German Ideology make it pretty clear that he thought a good run through capitalism was a necessary predicate to making a real run at "true socialism", or whatever, and one of the reasons for that is he admired capitalism's inherent ability to raise the standard of living and deal with scarcity. He also thought, or dreamed when he was high maybe, that the technological advances that capitalism would give us would free us from scarcity and allow us to all self-actualize.
Where I'm sure you and he part company is on the idea that work and struggle give human beings purpose and thus it is the very struggle to work and create that makes us human. After all, we can't all sit around naval gazing and painting water lilies with all of our free time after being liberated from the fetters of labor.
Cue the 'but true socialism hasn't been tried yet' crowd
I guess what I'm saying is that it's a parallel to us and our system of economy. Whether a public company reporting to Wall Street or a PE play answering to its limited partners, you are never done growing and expanding and creating value. You can't grow a company into profitability and say, "Ok, that's enough. It's sustainable. We're stopping here." America is great because of private property and the freedom to do well and the demand in our system that to succeed you have to create value. There is nothing in the soil, divine provenance is a stupid notion, and we don't have a better gene pool ... it's just those things. We adopted the British idea of capitalism, pumped it full of steroids consisting of the natural resources and undeveloped markets of the new world, and other shit I don't understand, and were lucky enough to devise a political system that helped all that along. Now we have yet another example of American ingenuity and value creation. The car displaced all the people connected with horses and carriages, the lamplighter lost his job with electricity, etc. etc.
When is too much too much? Nobody really knows. But human beings are never going to say no to anything that makes life easier.
Maybe the machines will do us a solid and stack the bodies at Lumen Field
Robots 1, Covid 0
Dont forgot to check beneath your bed for ChatGPT tonight
Conquest wasnt the problem IMO. Or the administration.
They definitely got complacent.
Despite the Tug's doom and gloom, America and friends remain lightyears ahead of the fucking Chinese and Russians.
I don't think anyone is suggesting the world is ending, but to argue that the US will endure forever is asinine. Regardless of whatever you consider complacency to mean
We can't know the future, but the hypotheticals about AI are funny.
Society has markedly improved in damn near every way over the last 100 years of vast technological innovation.
The Tug wouldve been bitching about horse breeders losing their jobs at Henry Ford, and it wouldve been bitching about OSHA laws limiting children in the coal mines. How can the mines remain profitable?!?!?!?!
Society evolves.
You guys are like the climate kooks thinking the world will be underwater unless we go vegan. Just on the other end of the spectrum.
Also - no one here knows shit about fuck. Aint an expert in sight. Which is why its fun
All of these models are scheduled to be replaced.
The thing that matters most if you are the United States is the Air Force and the Navy. These are the real teeth of the military. There is no peer to the F-22 or the F-35.
Many military experts believe the F-16 is better than anything Russia can field, and especially China.
Additionally, the naval equipment is vastly superior. The US has over a dozen carrier groups. China sort of has 1, and Russia can't even take their dilapidated POS out to sea.
The only thing China has that is at all decent is their anti-ship missles. No one knows how good those are and how well a carrier group with submarine support would do against them. And we will more than 99.99% likely never find out.
The US does not want to invade Russia or China, so who really gives a shit about artillery? The US will be fine and can produce shells at a decent clip if needed.
Tldr, the Air Force and Navy is the real imperial force. Not the javelin infantry launcher or some old ass humvees