Looks like I am right again
Comments
-
Couldn't have said it better myself. Those are my exact concerns.chuck said:T
It's not just the immediate $ payoff that matters. All of the blue bloods are consolidating into two super conferences. If UW wants to be one, they have to join. The west is already bleeding talent and relevance eastward. Imagine how bad that's going to be when the two relevant LA schools leave the west as well?Canadawg said:I just feel like money has diminished return. The most successful teams aren't necessarily the richest. Don't get me wrong you need a certain level but once you have that then putting yourself at a competitive disadvantage for more money seems dumb.
As far as where the rights go I just want whatever makes it easiest to access north of the border. I hope Kliavkoff keeps me in mind
I don't want to fight for tallest midget status with an outside shot at upsetting someone in the playoffs with our scrappy band of 3* recruits and portal castoffs from the super leagues. That sounds pretty lame. -
FSU and Clemson are situated in much more fertile recruiting territoryPostGameOrangeSlices said:
I just don't see it. Both FSU and Clemson proved they can go head to head with the SEC on the biggest stage and win natties.chuck said:
This scenario is the central assumption for me. I'm not sure I'd change my mind if it were taken away but I'd reevaluate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
If Clemson, FSU, and Miami join the SEC everything is fucked and UW should sell its soul to get into the B1G.chuck said:T
It's not just the immediate $ payoff that matters. All of the blue bloods are consolidating into two super conferences. If UW wants to be one, they have to join. The west is already bleeding talent and relevance eastward. Imagine how bad that's going to be when the two relevant LA schools leave the west as well?Canadawg said:I just feel like money has diminished return. The most successful teams aren't necessarily the richest. Don't get me wrong you need a certain level but once you have that then putting yourself at a competitive disadvantage for more money seems dumb.
As far as where the rights go I just want whatever makes it easiest to access north of the border. I hope Kliavkoff keeps me in mind
I don't want to fight for tallest midget status with an outside shot at upsetting someone in the playoffs with our scrappy band of 3* recruits and portal castoffs from the super leagues. That sounds pretty lame.
But that hasn't happened yet, and the ACC has more titles recently than the B1G does.
If the ACC survives, so does the PAC. We are still a long ways off from two super conferences.
Why would they give up an easier path to consistent playoffs for a few extra millions? I don't think they will -
Clemson is no longer a playoff team
-
Has the game passed Dabo by?RaceBannon said:Clemson is no longer a playoff team
-
Won't matter if we continue to kick ass in the portal. It's not like we are taking scrubs. We are taking proven players.DerekJohnson said:
FSU and Clemson are situated in much more fertile recruiting territoryPostGameOrangeSlices said:
I just don't see it. Both FSU and Clemson proved they can go head to head with the SEC on the biggest stage and win natties.chuck said:
This scenario is the central assumption for me. I'm not sure I'd change my mind if it were taken away but I'd reevaluate.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
If Clemson, FSU, and Miami join the SEC everything is fucked and UW should sell its soul to get into the B1G.chuck said:T
It's not just the immediate $ payoff that matters. All of the blue bloods are consolidating into two super conferences. If UW wants to be one, they have to join. The west is already bleeding talent and relevance eastward. Imagine how bad that's going to be when the two relevant LA schools leave the west as well?Canadawg said:I just feel like money has diminished return. The most successful teams aren't necessarily the richest. Don't get me wrong you need a certain level but once you have that then putting yourself at a competitive disadvantage for more money seems dumb.
As far as where the rights go I just want whatever makes it easiest to access north of the border. I hope Kliavkoff keeps me in mind
I don't want to fight for tallest midget status with an outside shot at upsetting someone in the playoffs with our scrappy band of 3* recruits and portal castoffs from the super leagues. That sounds pretty lame.
But that hasn't happened yet, and the ACC has more titles recently than the B1G does.
If the ACC survives, so does the PAC. We are still a long ways off from two super conferences.
Why would they give up an easier path to consistent playoffs for a few extra millions? I don't think they will -
Maybe, but they have a coach that has played in 4 title games and won two of them.RaceBannon said:Clemson is no longer a playoff team
No one in the B1G compares.
FSU also beat a tuff SEC team for the title. -
It's not 2012 anymore
That was 3 or 4 coaches ago
And it's not 2018 Clemson
In 2022 the B1G had 2 teams in
Not a coincidence -
Clemson was a QB away this year.RaceBannon said:It's not 2012 anymore
That was 3 or 4 coaches ago
And it's not 2018 Clemson
In 2022 the B1G had 2 teams in
Not a coincidence -
Excuses
It's what's for losers -
Posts that dont actually say anythingRaceBannon said:Excuses
It's what's for losers
It's for Race
Your beloved B1G teams cant even beat TCU
