Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
You had to cheer for Max Headroom's son Bo Nix and still went 9-3 and lost to both your rivals
Comments
-
37-34MikeSeaver said:
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
It was all over the internet
You lost and you get 2nd place
Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing -
RaceBannon said:
37-34MikeSeaver said:
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
It was all over the internet
You lost and you get 2nd place
Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing
I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.
“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.
I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.
Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?
What is the problem here? -
Class of 2010.MikeSeaver said:
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
There's no problem to solve here, you're just pressing and not making any discernable point. Apparently head to head now means nothing to you. That's pretty convenient.
There are no divisions this year but fuck it, you play all your divisional opponents anyways so we may as well crown ourselves. -
As usual…haie said:MikeSeaver said:
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
we may as well crown ourselves.
-
Never said Washington had a tougher schedule. Overall, Oregon's no question was because they played Georgia. In-conference, I think it's close, but I'd say Oregon's was tougher, but not by much.MikeSeaver said:RaceBannon said:
37-34MikeSeaver said:
We’re tied though. Same record. So no.haie said:
You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.MikeSeaver said:
Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.WoolleyDoog said:
North champs again.MikeSeaver said:
Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.WoolleyDoog said:
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.
Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.
Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:
Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.
Did you study theater or something?
It was all over the internet
You lost and you get 2nd place
Your NW Champs and North Division Champs thank you for playing
I’m only responding to what’s written on here. I’m not making anything up. You all are.
“Washington played all the top teams.” Is wrong.
“Oregon had the easier schedule.” Is wrong.
“We won a division” Is wrong.
I am saying Oregon failed this year. I am not arguing that.
Our failure of a season equals your 5th? best in the last 20 years? Maybe 8th best in the last 30?
What is the problem here?
Oregon's 7-2 is different, because you lost the tie-breaker and Oregon came back from a 10-4 season with a nice chunk of returning experience/talent. Washington came off 4-8 with the only two players who didn't look like ass last year leaving early for the NFL.
There's no fucking way you wouldn't trade say losing at Arizona and to UCLA for beating the Huskies and Beav, especially on the road. -
Facts are pesky things. Little Bro.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
-
Your wife with the 20lbs of baby fat she can’t shed.haie said:Mike's legit laughing at all of this and not upset in any way.
After the Flyover Cup ended I turned to my wife and said, "Thank God Oregon is a still a national brand. They'll be okay" -
That EPIC 3 point beat down grows by the minute. I’m not sure Oregon should field a team next year. No way they ever beat little bro or baby bro again.MikeSeaver said:
Ffs 😂WoolleyDoog said:
That's the problem. All of Oregon's chest beating and hype and money spent and shit makes it really funny when you can't beat UW and the Beav or gets double shoveled by a Mountain West program like last year.MikeSeaver said:
You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.hardhat said:
I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.
It's pretty funny, I've recently explained the Oregon = Nike/Phil Knight thing recently to some people who know nothing about college sports and they both immediately wondered how Oregon doesn't win like every game and dominate college football and basketball. Problem is it's still Oregon.
Talking about Phil Knight and Oregon football with people who hates sports?
Yep, Oregon fans are broken.
Legit laughing at this.
“You guys are not going to believe this….”
Fucking idiot. 😂 -
This is embarrassing even for FTJ.FireTheJanitor said:
In fairness Bill, if our pant size was 46x we would probably be this pathetic too.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
-
There needs to be a stat on your profile for the broken quadruple shitpoast 😆
Devs?
