Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You had to cheer for Max Headroom's son Bo Nix and still went 9-3 and lost to both your rivals

13567…11

Comments

  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    haie said:



    After the Flyover Cup ended I turned to my wife and said, "Thank God Oregon is a still a national brand. They'll be okay"


    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,574 Founders Club
    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    That's standings bro

    Won the head to head

    Have a better record

    But 👔
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 115,574 Founders Club
    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
    Now who doesn't believe in standings
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,776 Founders Club
    edited November 2022
    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    RaceBannon said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
    Now who doesn't believe in standings
    Still you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,465 Founders Club
    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
    You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    haie said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    WoolleyDoog said:

    MikeSeaver said:

    hardhat said:

    Fire_Marshall_Bill said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
    You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.
    We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

    There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

    Did you study theater or something?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter