Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

You had to cheer for Max Headroom's son Bo Nix and still went 9-3 and lost to both your rivals

WoolleyDoog
WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,035 Founders Club
edited February 16 in College Football Forum
«134

Comments

  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    Even Bo Nixed dad makes them mad.

    #Tormented
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967
    Cut them some slack this was a big year for little bro.

    They beat their big bro by 3 points.

    They tied Oregon and Utah for second.

    They have what may be their best offense in school history.

    They don’t have to play in the CCG and get slaughtered by SC.

    And they most likely get to back their way into a RB.

    Easily the best uw team since their Epic playoff loss.

    Imagine if they didn’t shit the bed at UCLA and ASU.
  • 46XiJCAB
    46XiJCAB Member Posts: 20,967

    46XiJCAB said:

    Cut them some slack this was a big year for little bro.

    They beat their big bro by 3 points.

    They tied Oregon and Utah for second.

    They have what may be their best offense in school history.

    They don’t have to play in the CCG and get slaughtered by SC.

    And they most likely get to back their way into a RB.

    Easily the best uw team since their Epic playoff loss.

    Imagine if they didn’t shit the bed at UCLA and ASU.

    Nobody's going to read that
    Nobody will admit to it I guarantee you that because it’s fact laden.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    Oregon's "big bro" that all the sudden thinks head to head doesn't count for conference standings 😂

    It doesn't get anymore loser than that.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    haie said:

    Oregon's "big bro" that all the sudden thinks head to head doesn't count for conference standings 😂

    It doesn't get anymore loser than that.

    Not sure what you’re taking about here. You didn’t play Utah.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    ^ biggest fucking Utah and ASU fans now reside in the Refuge 😆

    We don't need to play them. We're better than Utah. It's obvious. Even to you.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    haie said:

    ^ biggest fucking Utah and ASU fans now reside in the Refuge 😆

    We don't need to play them. We're better than Utah. It's obvious. Even to you.

    I know. It’s like why even play the games? Just say the team you think will win is the winner and nobody will get hurt anymore.
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,035 Founders Club

    Even Bo Nixed dad makes them mad.

    #Tormented

    I don't know what Bo Nix' dad looks like. I just think he looks like what Bo Nix would look like. I also love a program that's obsessed with with being hip, cool, flashy and kind Lib had to doog for a guy who is basically an 80s movie villain who's a maniac Christian.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    Even Bo Nixed dad makes them mad.

    #Tormented

    I don't know what Bo Nix' dad looks like. I just think he looks like what Bo Nix would look like. I also love a program that's obsessed with with being hip, cool, flashy and kind Lib had to doog for a guy who is basically an 80s movie villain who's a maniac Christian.
    Very cool story.
  • Fire_Marshall_Bill
    Fire_Marshall_Bill Member Posts: 25,584 Standard Supporter
    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"
  • FireTheJanitor
    FireTheJanitor Member Posts: 1,483

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    In fairness Bill, if our pant size was 46x we would probably be this pathetic too.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
  • hardhat
    hardhat Member Posts: 8,344

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    UW beat both of the bros, and they didn't care which one thought they were bigger.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    That's the problem. All of Oregon's chest beating and hype and money spent and shit makes it really funny when you can't beat UW and the Beav or gets double shoveled by a Mountain West program like last year.

    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    It's pretty funny, I've recently explained the Oregon = Nike/Phil Knight thing recently to some people who know nothing about college sports and they both immediately wondered how Oregon doesn't win like every game and dominate college football and basketball. Problem is it's still Oregon.
    Ffs 😂

    Talking about Phil Knight and Oregon football with people who hates sports?

    Yep, Oregon fans are broken.

    Legit laughing at this.

    “You guys are not going to believe this….”

    Fucking idiot. 😂

  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club
    Mike's legit laughing at all of this and not upset in any way.

    After the Flyover Cup ended I turned to my wife and said, "Thank God Oregon is a still a national brand. They'll be okay"
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    haie said:



    After the Flyover Cup ended I turned to my wife and said, "Thank God Oregon is a still a national brand. They'll be okay"


  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    That's standings bro

    Won the head to head

    Have a better record

    But 👔
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
  • RaceBannon
    RaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 113,715 Founders Club

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
    Now who doesn't believe in standings
  • WoolleyDoog
    WoolleyDoog Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,035 Founders Club
    edited November 2022

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Tie?

    It's worse than I thought here
    Oh that’s right. You don’t believe in standings.
    UW won the North

    There is no “North.”

    Claiming fake championships are kind of your brand though so I get it.

    Print the bumper sticker.
    Now who doesn't believe in standings
    Still you.
  • haie
    haie Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 23,694 Founders Club

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
    You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.
  • MikeSeaver
    MikeSeaver Member Posts: 5,800
    edited November 2022
    haie said:

    hardhat said:

    LMAO at 46xyzlgbt claiming Oregon is "big bro"

    I don't think the big bro thing worked out very well.

    You guys had a great season tying the failed Oregon season.
    Also, Oregon got UCLA, UW, and Utah at home. It was very easy to go better than 7-2 in-conference.

    Washington had the 6th (maybe 7th, can’t remember) easiest schedule in the conference and you played one more home game than Oregon.

    Oregon played the #1 schedule in the Pac12.

    Did any of you actually graduate from UW?
    North champs again.

    Are you talking overall or in-conference with this toughest schedule bullshit? I respect taking on Georgia. That kind of fucked you and they would have rolled anyone in the Pac-12. In conference you can make the argument Oregon's was tougher than UW's because the Huskies avoided Utah and Oregon didn't, but the Huskies also had UCLA and Oregon on the road.

    Several Pac-12 teams clearly had tougher in-conference roads than Oregon:

    Some teams had to play all of the top teams (Oregon, UCLA, USC, Utah, Washington) - UCLA, Arizona, and Stanford - Stanford had all of them other then USC on the road too and had to play the mighty Beav. No question Stanford had the toughest in-conference slate. Arizona probably second.
    Your opinion doesn’t matter. There are analytical SOS rankings available.

    For instance, your opinion that Washington had to play all the top teams is false. You didn’t play Utah or USC. That’s why you’re so low in the SOS rankings vs other conference schedules.
    You fucked up our SOS because it turned out you were soft front running pussies. We strengthened yours because we turned out to be the #2 team in the conference.
    We’re tied though. Same record. So no.

    There’s no way you went to UW. Can’t do simple problem solving.

    Did you study theater or something?