OK, I read the news some more and that guy's manifesto. He was obviously totally insane. In the first place sex is not all THAT great. The first few experiences, sure, it's great. After a couple of weeks it can turn into a routine, though. I mean, he never had sex and spent every moment he could spare, when not on video games, thinking about it etc. He should have just hired a hooker. I mean, how could it get worse for him. It's no wonder he went nuts.
Why bother to read anything that piece of shit wrote? You won't learn anything of value from it. The only value his 'manifesto' has is to wipe your ass on it or to use it to light your kindling in the winter. He deserves less respect than a maggot. He looks like a genderless little cunt, of course girls won't be interested in him. But hey, that's a great reason to go murder a bunch of innocent strangers.
So you're firmly against insane people murdering strangers?
OK, I read the news some more and that guy's manifesto. He was obviously totally insane. In the first place sex is not all THAT great. The first few experiences, sure, it's great. After a couple of weeks it can turn into a routine, though. I mean, he never had sex and spent every moment he could spare, when not on video games, thinking about it etc. He should have just hired a hooker. I mean, how could it get worse for him. It's no wonder he went nuts.
Why bother to read anything that piece of shit wrote? You won't learn anything of value from it. The only value his 'manifesto' has is to wipe your ass on it or to use it to light your kindling in the winter. He deserves less respect than a maggot. He looks like a genderless little cunt, of course girls won't be interested in him. But hey, that's a great reason to go murder a bunch of innocent strangers.
well, the only lesson there is that he was insane and badly in need of either a counselor/prozac, and/or hookers and blow. Probably all of that.
he was a psychopath, not sociopath as well. A psycho has totally lost contact with reality. A sociopath is just somebody that enjoys the misfortunes of others.
OK, I read the news some more and that guy's manifesto. He was obviously totally insane. In the first place sex is not all THAT great. The first few experiences, sure, it's great. After a couple of weeks it can turn into a routine, though. I mean, he never had sex and spent every moment he could spare, when not on video games, thinking about it etc. He should have just hired a hooker. I mean, how could it get worse for him. It's no wonder he went nuts.
Why bother to read anything that piece of shit wrote? You won't learn anything of value from it. The only value his 'manifesto' has is to wipe your ass on it or to use it to light your kindling in the winter. He deserves less respect than a maggot. He looks like a genderless little cunt, of course girls won't be interested in him. But hey, that's a great reason to go murder a bunch of innocent strangers.
So you're firmly against insane people murdering strangers?
I support insane people murdering strangers, but am against gun rights.
The Onion: "‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens."
You and CollegeDouche never could HANDLE THE TRUTH. The highest homicide rates are in countries where it is illegal for citizens to own guns.
Here comes the spin, in 3, 2, 1...
So let me get this straight - to support your made-up quip about the highest homicide rates being in countries where it is illegal to own guns you post a UNODC image showing homicide rates and then an AMMOLAND graphic citing "Small Arms Survey 2007"... First you don't provide info about gun legality. Second you ignore the whole point and just jump from insane people going on shooting rampages to overall homicides. Third your gun information is from some completely random, clearly biased source. Fourth you ignore the fact that we're trying to talk about developed countries here (as evidenced by the actual facts provided in the satire article I posted). It is sad that you try and compare America to Uganda and Colombia really tells me you have a skewed sense of who America's peers are. Why do you hate America?
The Onion: "‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens."
You and CollegeDouche never could HANDLE THE TRUTH. The highest homicide rates are in countries where it is illegal for citizens to own guns.
Here comes the spin, in 3, 2, 1...
I didn't know the homicide rates in Syria, Iraq and Egypt were less than 3 people per 100,000. Or is just that your maps don't include the martyrdom rates in the legend?
The Onion: "‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens."
You and CollegeDouche never could HANDLE THE TRUTH. The highest homicide rates are in countries where it is illegal for citizens to own guns.
Here comes the spin, in 3, 2, 1...
I didn't know the homicide rates in Syria, Iraq and Egypt were less than 3 people per 100,000. Or is just that your maps don't include the martyrdom rates in the legend?
The 2nd amendment is intended to give citizens a tool to defend themselves from enemies both foreign and domestic. Especially domestic. No gun control or any bullshit will keep what happened yesterday from happening. That kid was under the care of 2 mental health professionals, his parents told the cops he was nuts, the cops did fuck all. The doctors did fuck all. Now it's time for the incident to become the latest outrage of the day where we can say the politicians have to "do something" which will include rolling over and giving up rights that won't make a difference to solve this problem. As the cops become more militarized, the easiest way to violate our 4th amendment rights is to take away our 2nd amendment rights.
I don't even own a gun and I likely will never hunt for sport, but if I need a gun, a better god damn well better be able to get one. Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone.
The Onion: "‘No Way To Prevent This,’ Says Only Nation Where This Regularly Happens."
You and CollegeDouche never could HANDLE THE TRUTH. The highest homicide rates are in countries where it is illegal for citizens to own guns.
Here comes the spin, in 3, 2, 1...
So let me get this straight - to support your made-up quip about the highest homicide rates being in countries where it is illegal to own guns you post a UNODC image showing homicide rates and then an AMMOLAND graphic citing "Small Arms Survey 2007"... First you don't provide info about gun legality. Second you ignore the whole point and just jump from insane people going on shooting rampages to overall homicides. Third your gun information is from some completely random, clearly biased source. Fourth you ignore the fact that we're trying to talk about developed countries here (as evidenced by the actual facts provided in the satire article I posted). It is sad that you try and compare America to Uganda and Colombia really tells me you have a skewed sense of who America's peers are. Why do you hate America?
So let me get this straight, statistics and facts are beaten by...
I would just like to go on record to say that while I support the 2nd Amendment....I am against supporting the rights of the 2nd Amendment.
The NRA and gun nuts always get amnesia when it comes to the "well regulated" part.
And for those who like to parse Constitutional language, I ask which phrase appears first in the Constitution/Bill of Rights: "... Separation of church and state..." - or - "... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..."
I would just like to go on record to say that while I support the 2nd Amendment....I am against supporting the rights of the 2nd Amendment.
The NRA and gun nuts always get amnesia when it comes to the "well regulated" part.
And for those who like to parse Constitutional language, I ask which phrase appears first in the Constitution/Bill of Rights: "... Separation of church and state..." - or - "... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..."
OH OH, I KNOW THIS ONE...
The First Amendment doesn't say anything about separation of Church and State. Here it is...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Second Amendment is about tyranny, not hunting. Might I be defending myself against a "well regulated militia" (armed by the State) some day?
It's happened before, right after the King of England ordered civilians to surrender their weapons.
So much for Gun-Free-Zones. History is such a Muther Fucker.
Comments
http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_detailpage&v=MMzd40i8TfAYou and CollegeDouche never could HANDLE THE TRUTH. The highest homicide rates are in countries where it is illegal for citizens to own guns.
Here comes the spin, in 3, 2, 1...
First you don't provide info about gun legality.
Second you ignore the whole point and just jump from insane people going on shooting rampages to overall homicides.
Third your gun information is from some completely random, clearly biased source.
Fourth you ignore the fact that we're trying to talk about developed countries here (as evidenced by the actual facts provided in the satire article I posted). It is sad that you try and compare America to Uganda and Colombia really tells me you have a skewed sense of who America's peers are. Why do you hate America?
I don't even own a gun and I likely will never hunt for sport, but if I need a gun, a better god damn well better be able to get one. Fuck you, fuck me, fuck everyone.
wait for it...
The Onion?
"... Separation of church and state..."
- or -
"... the right of the people to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed..."
The First Amendment doesn't say anything about separation of Church and State. Here it is...
"Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances."
The Second Amendment is about tyranny, not hunting. Might I be defending myself against a "well regulated militia" (armed by the State) some day?
It's happened before, right after the King of England ordered civilians to surrender their weapons.
So much for Gun-Free-Zones. History is such a Muther Fucker.