Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

A Q for the bored re: DeBoner?

1356

Comments

  • chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 11,443 Swaye's Wigwam
    Fishpo31 said:

    Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...
    The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.

    Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them.
  • WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,804
    chuck said:

    The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.

    Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them.
    im hearing we actually blitz now
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,819
    chuck said:

    I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.
    He's really bad in run support but with this front 7 that actually stops the run that's less of an issue. He probably fits this defense (which struggles moreso with coverage) pretty well.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,858 Founders Club
    I don't think we lose to Stanfraud.

    Cal: yes

    We always find a way to lose to them. I'm old enough to remember dominating them in the 80s and 90s.
  • Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,858 Founders Club
    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
  • dncdnc Member Posts: 56,819

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    That's not a 6-6 team.
  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,859 Founders Club

    Disagree on Haener but chin anyway for Penix. He's fucking legit

    However there will be a game or three where the passing attack struggles. Always is



    Pullme in the snow.

  • pawzpawz Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 21,859 Founders Club
    dnc said:

    That's not a 6-6 team.
    Agree.




    4-8

  • MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    edited September 2022

    I knew you would not make a prediction. You said last week 5-7 was a real possibility.
    It was. Fuckwad. Still is if we get a broken Penix
  • PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 26,962 Swaye's Wigwam

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyone

  • TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 6,455 Swaye's Wigwam

    We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyone

    I do wonder how things might have looked differently if Spartacus had its best player. I think the passing game could have been a bigger threat from the beginning. Especially with UW’s god awful pass D.
Sign In or Register to comment.