Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
Options

A Q for the bored re: DeBoner?

1356

Comments

  • Options
    chuckchuck Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 10,612
    First Comment First Anniversary 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    Fishpo31 said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.

    We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.
    Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...
    The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.

    Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them.
  • Options
    WilburHooksHandsWilburHooksHands Member Posts: 6,741
    5 Up Votes First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes
    chuck said:

    Fishpo31 said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.

    We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.
    Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...
    The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.

    Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them.
    im hearing we actually blitz now
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    chuck said:

    chuck said:

    Fishpo31 said:

    dnc said:

    Doogles said:

    We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.

    We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.
    Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...
    The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.

    Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them.
    We actually missed Asa's coverage last game
    I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.
    He's really bad in run support but with this front 7 that actually stops the run that's less of an issue. He probably fits this defense (which struggles moreso with coverage) pretty well.
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    I don't think we lose to Stanfraud.

    Cal: yes

    We always find a way to lose to them. I'm old enough to remember dominating them in the 80s and 90s.
  • Options
    Fire_Marshall_BillFire_Marshall_Bill Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 22,815
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club
    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
  • Options
    dncdnc Member Posts: 56,614
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    That's not a 6-6 team.
  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,756
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club

    I know we are all traumatized but people acting like DeBoer and Penix came out of nowhere and have no track record are a special kind of traumatized. They dropped their nuts all over the B1G at fucking Indiana and if you think this offense is smoke and mirrors your eyes are not as good as mine.

    “Yeah but Haener was playing the MWC”
    “Yeah but it’s all Penix”

    You guys sound like cougs.

    Disagree on Haener but chin anyway for Penix. He's fucking legit

    However there will be a game or three where the passing attack struggles. Always is



    Pullme in the snow.

  • Options
    pawzpawz Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 18,756
    First Anniversary 5 Up Votes First Comment 5 Awesomes
    Founders Club
    dnc said:

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    That's not a 6-6 team.
    Agree.




    4-8

  • Options
    MikeDamoneMikeDamone Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 37,781
    First Anniversary First Comment 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes
    Swaye's Wigwam
    edited September 2022

    Doogles said:

    Doogles said:

    We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.

    The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?
    I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.

    LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
    So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?
    Nobody but you thinks 5 wins. Don’t use your own prediction for others. Your shtick sucks and is boring. Make a predicton. Queef something out of that cunt. Bring something other than “Deboer has Penix!”
    I didn’t predict 5 wins you dumb fucking cunt. I said it wasn’t outside the realm of possibilities and many here are saying if. Penix goes down it’s possible. Fuck off and fuck you. Learn to read you imbecile.

    Lots of talk here about “we are screwed if Penix goes down” and “the season goes as does Penix”. That didn’t come from me you dumb ass. It’s all over the board.

    EMFA
    🥱🥱🥱🥱
    That’s what I thought you’d say. Dumbfuck.
    I knew you would not make a prediction. You said last week 5-7 was a real possibility.
    It was. Fuckwad. Still is if we get a broken Penix
  • Options
    PostGameOrangeSlicesPostGameOrangeSlices Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 24,526
    First Anniversary 5 Awesomes 5 Up Votes Combo Breaker
    Founders Club

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyone

  • Options
    TheHBTheHB Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 5,313
    First Comment 5 Up Votes 5 Awesomes First Anniversary
    Swaye's Wigwam

    We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄

    We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyone

    I do wonder how things might have looked differently if Spartacus had its best player. I think the passing game could have been a bigger threat from the beginning. Especially with UW’s god awful pass D.
Sign In or Register to comment.