Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
A Q for the bored re: DeBoner?
Comments
-
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, then throw a 50/50 ball to receivers who can't catch" for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
-
Hope I don't need this
-
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
Bored will be more fun if you doRaceBannon said:Hope I don't need this
-
im hearing we actually blitz nowchuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
He's really bad in run support but with this front 7 that actually stops the run that's less of an issue. He probably fits this defense (which struggles moreso with coverage) pretty well.chuck said:
I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
I don't think we lose to Stanfraud.
Cal: yes
We always find a way to lose to them. I'm old enough to remember dominating them in the 80s and 90s.
