Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.
A Q for the bored re: DeBoner?
Comments
-
Hi there.MelloDawg said:This season is all Penix. When DeBoer recruits and builds with a QB not from the portal, you may then crown him.
Being able to pull talent out of the portal is one of the most important skills a coach can have these days.
STOP LIVING IN THE PAST!!!!1 -
Careful, you are going to trigger some doogs.MelloDawg said:This season is all Penix. When DeBoer recruits and builds with a QB not from the portal, you may then crown him.
-
I know we are all traumatized but people acting like DeBoer and Penix came out of nowhere and have no track record are a special kind of traumatized. They dropped their nuts all over the B1G at fucking Indiana and if you think this offense is smoke and mirrors your eyes are not as good as mine.
“Yeah but Haener was playing the MWC”
“Yeah but it’s all Penix”
You guys sound like cougs. -
The if your QB gets hurt sob story (5 wins max) is the case for every team except Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia and USC.MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
-
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
-
you’re such a fag. Thanks for playing captain obvious!MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure. -
We’ll have more than 9 points with like 8 minutes to play in the first quarter. Cook it. Stanford’s defense is horrid.Alexis said:About 1030 on Saturday night while Shaw is smirking up at the 13-9 on the scoreboard.
-
Take it up with Road55. He seems to disagree with you. Fuckface.backthepack said:
you’re such a fag. Thanks for playing captain obvious!MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure. -
Bullshit.RTD said:
The if your QB gets hurt sob story (5 wins max) is the case for every team except Alabama, Ohio State, Georgia and USC.MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
If Nix goes gone Oregon wins 5?
I don’t even know who WSUs QB is. But I’m sure he’s not the difference between winning and losing 3-4 more games.
It’s the doog narrative though. -
Disagree on Haener but chin anyway for Penix. He's fucking legitWilburHooksHands said:I know we are all traumatized but people acting like DeBoer and Penix came out of nowhere and have no track record are a special kind of traumatized. They dropped their nuts all over the B1G at fucking Indiana and if you think this offense is smoke and mirrors your eyes are not as good as mine.
“Yeah but Haener was playing the MWC”
“Yeah but it’s all Penix”
You guys sound like cougs.
However there will be a game or three where the passing attack struggles. Always is
-
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, then throw a 50/50 ball to receivers who can't catch" for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
-
Hope I don't need this
-
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
Bored will be more fun if you doRaceBannon said:Hope I don't need this
-
im hearing we actually blitz nowchuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
He's really bad in run support but with this front 7 that actually stops the run that's less of an issue. He probably fits this defense (which struggles moreso with coverage) pretty well.chuck said:
I dont follow him enough to grade his coverage, but I know he's good at reading throws and coming off his man to make plays. He also has the height to contest the 50:50 balls.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We actually missed Asa's coverage last gamechuck said:
The 50:50 balls give me nightmares. Fag Asa would be good to have back for this game assuming that the front 7 can handle the furd running game (Turner has been a huge liability against them in the past). He is good at getting to balls inbthe air.Fishpo31 said:
Not unless they are saving the package of "Run into a stacked box on first/second downs, for PAC play, as they seemingly have done for the past decade...dnc said:
We aren't going to struggle with Stanford. Their system isn't kryptonite for our offense or our defense anymore. Won't be close.Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
Generally all one has to do to dominate Furd is pressure the QB. When UW has done that we've stopped them on 3rd down and beaten them. -
I don't think we lose to Stanfraud.
Cal: yes
We always find a way to lose to them. I'm old enough to remember dominating them in the 80s and 90s. -
We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
-
That's not a 6-6 team.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
-
USC destroyed Stanford with the deep ball
I actually do like our chances -
Pullme in the snow.RaceBannon said:
Disagree on Haener but chin anyway for Penix. He's fucking legitWilburHooksHands said:I know we are all traumatized but people acting like DeBoer and Penix came out of nowhere and have no track record are a special kind of traumatized. They dropped their nuts all over the B1G at fucking Indiana and if you think this offense is smoke and mirrors your eyes are not as good as mine.
“Yeah but Haener was playing the MWC”
“Yeah but it’s all Penix”
You guys sound like cougs.
However there will be a game or three where the passing attack struggles. Always is
-
Agree.dnc said:
That's not a 6-6 team.Fire_Marshall_Bill said:We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
4-8
-
I knew you would not make a prediction. You said last week 5-7 was a real possibility.MikeDamone said:
That’s what I thought you’d say. Dumbfuck.RoadDawg55 said:
🥱🥱🥱🥱MikeDamone said:
I didn’t predict 5 wins you dumb fucking cunt. I said it wasn’t outside the realm of possibilities and many here are saying if. Penix goes down it’s possible. Fuck off and fuck you. Learn to read you imbecile.RoadDawg55 said:
Nobody but you thinks 5 wins. Don’t use your own prediction for others. Your shtick sucks and is boring. Make a predicton. Queef something out of that cunt. Bring something other than “Deboer has Penix!”MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
Lots of talk here about “we are screwed if Penix goes down” and “the season goes as does Penix”. That didn’t come from me you dumb ass. It’s all over the board.
EMFA -
It was. Fuckwad. Still is if we get a broken PenixRoadDawg55 said:
I knew you would not make a prediction. You said last week 5-7 was a real possibility.MikeDamone said:
That’s what I thought you’d say. Dumbfuck.RoadDawg55 said:
🥱🥱🥱🥱MikeDamone said:
I didn’t predict 5 wins you dumb fucking cunt. I said it wasn’t outside the realm of possibilities and many here are saying if. Penix goes down it’s possible. Fuck off and fuck you. Learn to read you imbecile.RoadDawg55 said:
Nobody but you thinks 5 wins. Don’t use your own prediction for others. Your shtick sucks and is boring. Make a predicton. Queef something out of that cunt. Bring something other than “Deboer has Penix!”MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
Lots of talk here about “we are screwed if Penix goes down” and “the season goes as does Penix”. That didn’t come from me you dumb ass. It’s all over the board.
EMFA -
So I should write you down for 6-6?MikeDamone said:
It was. Fuckwad. Still is if we get a broken PenixRoadDawg55 said:
I knew you would not make a prediction. You said last week 5-7 was a real possibility.MikeDamone said:
That’s what I thought you’d say. Dumbfuck.RoadDawg55 said:
🥱🥱🥱🥱MikeDamone said:
I didn’t predict 5 wins you dumb fucking cunt. I said it wasn’t outside the realm of possibilities and many here are saying if. Penix goes down it’s possible. Fuck off and fuck you. Learn to read you imbecile.RoadDawg55 said:
Nobody but you thinks 5 wins. Don’t use your own prediction for others. Your shtick sucks and is boring. Make a predicton. Queef something out of that cunt. Bring something other than “Deboer has Penix!”MikeDamone said:
So you're a 10 win guy. Of course if Penix gets hurt walking to class this week it's 5 wins. But still. You're 10 wins has losses at UCLA and either Oregon or WSU. Correct?Doogles said:
I think this is a 9-10 win team. I'm no Nostradamus, but I see us dropping one of the NW games and @UCLA.MikeDamone said:
The consensus here seems to be 8-9 wins. Who are the 3-4 losses to?Doogles said:We're not losing to Stanford, take the screenshots.
LA problems aside, more man coverage and aggression in the front 7 did allow MSUs QB to get chunks on the ground during breakdowns. My fear is 7th year DTR might have a career day carving us up on scrambles out of the pocket. We survive that, 10 wins for sure.
Lots of talk here about “we are screwed if Penix goes down” and “the season goes as does Penix”. That didn’t come from me you dumb ass. It’s all over the board.
EMFA -
We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyoneFire_Marshall_Bill said:We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
-
I do wonder how things might have looked differently if Spartacus had its best player. I think the passing game could have been a bigger threat from the beginning. Especially with UW’s god awful pass D.PostGameOrangeSlices said:
We beat a team that won an NY6 and returned everyoneFire_Marshall_Bill said:We beat a 6-6 Big Ten team! We're going 10-2!! 🙄
