Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Puka Nacua, 2019 4* WR, Orem, UT (Committed)

1…1112141617…54

Comments

  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,103
    CuntWaffle said:

    tvoie said:

    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    So no one (especially ektard) knows WTF is going on??? Sounds about the norm.
    How dare you question Scott’s credentials as a respected journalist. This is honestly the stuff that makes this site so difficult to be a part of. Scott has been nothing short of stellar in his coverage of UW recruiting and you all constantly bring up the very few examples where he was slightly misguided in his analysis. These examples are not indicative of the hardworking, upstanding recruiting guru that is Scott Ecklund. You should all be ashamed of yourselves. We should all be a little more like Scott...
    Yup. If you guys start throwing out accusations then put your social security number and credit card info by them. Either that or you will be put in timeout. No warning, just gone.
    Adult timeout?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Meek
    Meek Member Posts: 7,031
    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • sinceredawg
    sinceredawg Member Posts: 837
    So no birthday parties?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    Meek said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    *$12.95
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • FireCohen
    FireCohen Member Posts: 21,823
    TommySQC said:

    Meek said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    $10.95!
    *$12.95
    Chinflation?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LaMichael_Corleone
    LaMichael_Corleone Member Posts: 1,316
    insinceredawg said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night.
    This. But what matters is WHO attended the in-home. Was it the same people who came right before his visit (Ikaika, Bush, Junior) or is Pete going. If Pete isn’t going this is not a good sign because that means he can smell the scent of Johnny Nansens money and doesn’t wanna waste a day in Utah if he knows we don’t have a shot.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • Baseman
    Baseman Member Posts: 12,369
    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    insinceredawg said:

    CallMeBigErn said:

    LaMichael_Corleone said:

    So, either Pete already went in-home (which I know for a fact he didn’t) or Scott Eklund is full of shit (which I also know for a fact) and needs to be fucking called out for it. First he said were gonnna go in home and wrap it up, then he said we aren’t going in home, then he says the Nacua-Pete in home already happened......?










    This is one of the greatest Eklund contradiction examples because the answers were literally right next to each other.

    Yes. I asked this question and I still don't know what the fuck answer I received. Pete either has already had an in-home, will have an in-home, or won't have an in-home. Your guess is as good as mine.
    TYFYS. Keep it up with the passive aggressiveness and ask when the in-home happened. Based on Scott's comments, it must have happened on Monday or Tuesday night.
    This. But what matters is WHO attended the in-home. Was it the same people who came right before his visit (Ikaika, Bush, Junior) or is Pete going. If Pete isn’t going this is not a good sign because that means he can smell the scent of Johnny Nansens money and doesn’t wanna waste a day in Utah if he knows we don’t have a shot.
    Paopao and Adams
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    DoogCourics said:
























    What a cocksucker. Maybe if he could be a bit more clear in his fucking ramblings, no one would ask for clarification or take him out of context.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,103
    CuntWaffle said:

    All of you criticizing Scott Eklund I would like to see you grab a fucking keyboard and type out of your ass for $10.95 if it is so fucking easy.

    A lot of things I would do with my ass for 10.95, out/in, whatever’s 🤷🏽‍♂️
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • CallMeBigErn
    CallMeBigErn Member Posts: 8,028
    I'm so lost, I don't even know what to think anymore. Any other Dawgman subscribers? I need backup. Ecklund is making less than zero sense.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • animate
    animate Member Posts: 4,245
    bananasnblondes said:

    DoogCourics said:
























    Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"?
    It's not profitable to say that shit.

    The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?"

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    animate said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    DoogCourics said:
























    Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"?
    It's not profitable to say that shit.

    The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?"

    This
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,103
    TommySQC said:

    animate said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    DoogCourics said:
























    Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"?
    It's not profitable to say that shit.

    The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?"

    This
    Are the sheep so dump they can’t see the wolf digging in their wallets?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LaMichael_Corleone
    LaMichael_Corleone Member Posts: 1,316
    edited January 2019
    Uhhhhh well Scott if you wanna be a douche about it.....ummmm.... when exactly did Pete visit?


    Because he was reportedly (by Scott) going in on Tuesday to “wrap up” Heimuli.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • TommySQC
    TommySQC Member Posts: 5,813
    dirtysouwfdawg said:

    TommySQC said:

    animate said:

    bananasnblondes said:

    DoogCourics said:
























    Why is it so hard for these fuckers to say "I was wrong" or "I had wrong information"?
    It's not profitable to say that shit.

    The moment you say "I was wrong or I misspoke" is the moment when people paying you 10.95 a month are going to say "why am I paying these fuckers 10.95?"

    This
    Are the sheep so dump they can’t see the wolf digging in their wallets?
    Yes. I'm killing myself for not starting my cult earlier.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LaMichael_Corleone
    LaMichael_Corleone Member Posts: 1,316
    @CallMeBigErn ask eklund why we didn’t get any word of Pete going in home and then all of the sudden you say it already happened. Either Pete went in home and he was too lazy, to tell anyone in his previous posts or reports when that should probably be a big deal?


    Maybe it happened in the early signing period lead up without anyone knowing? But as a guy who was committed and had his visit to USC during the last weekend before the east period, don’t you think we would have heard about that?
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • dirtysouwfdawg
    dirtysouwfdawg Member Posts: 14,103
    No new news??
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter