WTF is Climate Change?

CollegeDoog said:

salemcoog said:

CollegeDoog said:

RaceBannon said:

Good. I trust the guys that have skin in the game and have succeeded in life over some moron screaming Koch brothers. CollegeDoog is d2d all the way


For every Solyndra there's a Tesla. You have to buy a ticket to win the raffle.

The tropical regions of the oceans swallow the equivalent of 170 billion barrels of oil in solar megajoules daily, more than enough to power the United States for years. Solar is by far the biggest potential resource we could tap into, and it is imperative that we find ways to make the sun > energy process more efficient.

Oh Doogie, Your professors steer you so wrong, Remember they are there for their talent of grant writing and reading curriculum from a syllabus. Not because they actually know how the real world works.

First of all there is only one Tesla. And for the one Tesla there is over 30 other multimillion dollar failures in clean tech. It's dead especially in America for a reason I will list later.

Yes, Hydroelectric, wind, solar, and nuclear are all "dead" in America



15% and of the energy market and expanding is "dead"

You speak of all the energy that is absorbed by the oceans from the sun. Well as I'm sure you, the Oceans are 3/4 of the earth and will not allow for solar panels.

Holy fucking retardism. It was an example that conveyed how much potential solar energy there is. I didn't say to literally put solar panels on the ocean.

Also this Obama clean tech stimilus allowed Chinese companies to scoop up Billions worth of R & D for free and have made it so clean tech , especially solar will not have a domestic infrastructure that will generate profit. Obama sold it out to the Chinese directly or indirectly. So if you want to increase and maybe double the costs of energy than we'll go the route you describe.

Obama has been awful on clean tech. I've made that point several times.

Your woodchip energy plant at your school is also much more expensive than natural gas or oil. So if the rest of the world is spewing more co2 than We are and clean tech is double the price and not really economically sustainable, Why other than idealism should the government or private investors continue throw their money in that rat hole?

You speak from an ignorant position. It's saved $1 million worth of energy costs since it was introduced in 2009. Fuck off.

I've heard Finance is your wheelhouse so I'm looking to be educated here.

Doogie,

You never answered my question. How and why should American investors and taxpayers throw their $$$ into ventures that have no possiblity of profitability and cost double what the current energy resources are?

Your graph illustrates my point quite profoundly in that of your 15% of "sustainable" energy, that 1/2 of it comes from Nuclear resources.

Doogie, Do you really think America has the appetite to keep building nuclear reactors for power after what we saw at Fukushima.

And doogie please post the school's power bill pre-2009 as opposed to the power bills and cost to operate your chip burning plant post 2009. If you don't.... you're a liar.

But you already knew that.