Howdy, Stranger!

It looks like you're new here. Sign in or register to get started.

Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Theoretical socialism

124678

Comments

  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    You used to make $15,000/month and had $10,000/month in essential expenses. Now you make $5,000/month but have $12,000/month in essential expenses. That's what's going on in Venezuela. Yes they should have diversified their economy. Kuwait, Bahrain, and Qatar did years ago, before the price of oil collapsed. It's too late for Venezuela to diversify. Diversifying takes capital, and Venezuela doesn't have any, and because of US sanctions, their ability to get financing is damn near impossible. The only financing they can get is from Russia and China with horrible terms, and who get paid back in oil. Problem being, this oil production eats up any domestic product they receive because instead of selling it, it's being used to pay interest.

    The only way Venezuela can be fixed is with a regime change, and the forgiveness of some past debt. Their oil industry will then become foreign owned, and that would force them to diversify, because their cash cow oil industry wouldn't belong to them anymore. The one problem with this is that many countries still wouldn't be go with this, because Venezuela has had prior history of nationalizing and seizing foreign companies. It would have to be tightly controlled.

    But yes, Socialism sucks. Socialism is what prevented Venezuela from cutting spending when times got tough. I think they'd still be screwed, but I think the fall would have been much much slower.
    What caused the Venezuelan government to increase it's borrowing and spending? Just because you make $15,000 a month doesn't require that you go out and spend $20,000 a month putting the extra $5K on a credit card.

    Socialism is what caused the explosion of borrowing and spending to begin with.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,888 Standard Supporter
    edited December 2018
    2001400ex said:

    Most of the ownership of business in China is owned by the government and they sure are doing fine with economic growth. HTH
    After everyone in China has had who knows how many family members murdered or starved to death by the government they are pretty compliant.

    Also far poorer than Venezuelans prior to socialism. They get a very small benefit from their forced labor but cracks are beginning to show with some of that wealth.

    They shoot you in the head if you don't do what they say and send the bill for the bullet to your family! Fuck you are dumb!
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,553
    SFGbob said:

    What caused the Venezuelan government to increase it's borrowing and spending? Just because you make $15,000 a month doesn't require that you go out and spend $20,000 a month putting the extra $5K on a credit card.

    Socialism is what caused the explosion of borrowing and spending to begin with.
    If you read it to the end you’d see I said that.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,553
    edited December 2018
    2001400ex said:

    Ok. That number is probably high but fine I'm take it. Explain how that is the driving factor in the huge growth in China.
    Instead of having to invest in R&D, you can steal it.
  • PurpleThrobberPurpleThrobber Member Posts: 46,712 Standard Supporter

    Yeah but that’s not REAL socialism like they have in Norway!


    The Throbber endorses the brand of Norwegian socialism that produces smoking hot women.


  • Pitchfork51Pitchfork51 Member Posts: 27,412



    The Throbber endorses the brand of Norwegian socialism that produces smoking hot women.


    Very very interesting argument.

    Brb need to think it over
  • creepycougcreepycoug Member Posts: 23,846

    Hondo is creep's idea of a kid with a well rounded education

    Dumb as a fucking rock anti Semite communist apologist

    No. That's not my idea. You said it's my idea. But it's not my idea.
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181
    edited December 2018

    If you read it to the end you’d see I said that.
    I thought you were claiming that their dependence on oil is what caused their problems?

    Venezuela is what you get when 95% of your country's economy is reliant on a single resource.
  • greenbloodgreenblood Member Posts: 14,553
    edited December 2018
    SFGbob said:

    I thought you were claiming that their dependence on oil is what caused their problems?

    Venezuela is what you get when 95% of your country's economy is reliant on a single resource.
    Yes it is. 95% of their income got cut by 75%. But they also couldn’t stop giving entitlements. Both combined and you have hyperinflation and a complete meltdown. A perfect storm

    Without the oil price drop they could have gone another 20-30 years on their continued spending.
  • SledogSledog Member Posts: 35,888 Standard Supporter

    Yes it is. 95% of their income got cut by 75%. But they also couldn’t stop giving entitlements. Both combined and you have hyperinflation and a complete meltdown. A perfect storm

    Without the oil price drop they could have gone another 20-30 years on their continued spending.
    Damn those market conditions Fucking up all the socialist paradises!!
  • SFGbobSFGbob Member Posts: 33,181

    Yes it is. 95% of their income got cut by 75%. But they also couldn’t stop giving entitlements. Both combined and you have hyperinflation and a complete meltdown. A perfect storm

    Without the oil price drop they could have gone another 20-30 years on their continued spending.
    If you got rid of the socialism and only had a cut in the price of oil would they be the basket case they are today?
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 17,269 Swaye's Wigwam

    More than half of millennials have a positive view of socialism. You’ve already lost.

    Young people are generally more progressive and skew more conservative as they age. Probably has to do with having to pay more in taxes, accumulating more wealth, and gaining experience watching government fail as they age.

    I've been hearing about the demographic tidal wave shift to progressiveness for more than 20 yrs.
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 17,269 Swaye's Wigwam
    SFGbob said:

    Yes they are diversified now, they weren’t always so. There was nothing stopping Venezuela from diversifying their economy.

    The fact that Venezuela got so much of their income from oil doesn’t explain why they are a shithole today.
    Venezuela used to be the breadbasket of South America and a net exporter of food and other goods. Mysteriously, after the implementation of socialismo, their industries have shrunk and they've become net importers of basically everything except for one natural resource.

    Totally unrelated according to Hondo.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,769 Founders Club
    Yeah it sucks to be oil rich. Many countries collapse due to oil. Quite common really

    One day you got oil the next you can't buy toilet paper

    Who comes up with these stupid fucking arguments?
  • CirrhosisDawgCirrhosisDawg Member Posts: 6,390

    Young people are generally more progressive and skew more conservative as they age. Probably has to do with having to pay more in taxes, accumulating more wealth, and gaining experience watching government fail as they age.

    I've been hearing about the demographic tidal wave shift to progressiveness for more than 20 yrs.
    Really? Aging boomers voted for trump because they can’t compete in today’s world and demand government intervention (tariffs nativism, and economic protectionism). The voting preference of today’s old fucks is wealth transfer and activist government intervention. They have no preference at all for “conservatism”

    Sounds like you “hearing” from the same people telling you that impeachment is coming any day now.
  • RaceBannonRaceBannon Member, Moderator, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 110,769 Founders Club
    Soccer will be the most popular sport
  • UW_Doog_BotUW_Doog_Bot Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 17,269 Swaye's Wigwam

    Really? Aging boomers voted for trump because they can’t compete in today’s world and demand government intervention (tariffs nativism, and economic protectionism). The voting preference of today’s old fucks is wealth transfer and activist government intervention. They have no preference at all for “conservatism”

    Sounds like you “hearing” from the same people telling you that impeachment is coming any day now.
    I've been "hearing" from the boareds "liberals" how impeachment is coming any day now. That's still the case last I checked the Tug. What's changed?

    It's a fair point about the changing faces of American politics, both parties have swerved towards populist "economics". It's still the same old Dixiecrats voting for nativism & protectionism they're just boomer republicans now.
Sign In or Register to comment.