Some interesting redshirt decisions upcoming
Comments
-
Hunter is kind of a Wes Welker type who will find a job in the NFL due to film study and a blue collar work ethic
-
This is exhibit A against arguing with stupid people. They can’t tell when they’ve lost the argument because they are too fucking dumb to detect it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
It's like you think that factor wasn't also part of the decision. Of course he could get hurt. Shit, he could get hurt bad enough next year that 2020 and 2021 are completely irrelevant and his career is over. He could get hurt in the 2nd game of 2020 and redshirt the whole year, or he could get hurt in the 5th game of 2020 and we'll sorely wish that we hadn't burned his redshirt this year. All of those are possibilities. I'm sure there are coaches who would put more weight on the future probability of him getting injured and therefore bank on him potentially needing that fifth year, and would have determined that reps against OSU weren't worth more than that future possibility. Other coaches, such as ours, would prioritize getting him as game-ready as possible for the last three game stretch that will make or break the 2018 season.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Again you fucking idiot - he could get injured and play half years you fuckstick. LIKE HE DID THIS YEAR!!! LIKE HE DID LAST YEAR...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Again, if he’s not going to be around in 2021, why the fuck does it matter? The coaches clearly made the assessment that the benefit of getting him more reps to gear up for the Apple Cup outweighed the remote possibility that he comes back for a 5th year. You might disagree with that assessment if you think there is a chance he comes back, but to call it “FUCKING RETARDED” is just standard DDY hysterical hyperbole.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao.
AND PERHAPS THAT COULD PREVENT HIM FROM LEAVING EARLY YOU FUCKING RETARDED COW.
Jesus fucking Christ you coach-defenders are complete fucking idiots.
The point, you dense motherfucker, is that it's a cost-benefit analysis, and different coaches will come to different conclusions. Both conclusions are perfectly valid, though I happen to agree more with the one our coaches came to (and I said as much when Bryant was back for the Stanford game, that I hoped we wouldn't sit him for OSU).
But I should probably know better than that and not get in the way of another self-parodying DDY rant. -
I can maybe get the Bryant deployment if you are leaving yourself the possibility of shutting him down for the bowel game
I’m not sure I can follow how and why we’ve used Hampton/Irvin/Gordon, and do not trust Pete not impulsively using them on special teams going forward (especially in the bowel game where his tryhards will get crushed)
Finally, we seem to have redshirted Tuli despite having to give meaningful snaps for guys like John Clark, and Spiker and Osborne can’t even get game snaps despite our WR JAGs, and special teams tryhards.
It just doesn’t add up to a coherent policy - maybe there is some magic formula behind the scenes which explains all this, but it feels more like Pete is just flying by the seat of his pants because he hasn’t figured out how best to use the new rule, and instead is impulsively just playing the guys he thinks are best, or likes the best, in the moment -
Jesus Christ, OOYWE.Dennis_DeYoung said:
This is exhibit A against arguing with stupid people. They can’t tell when they’ve lost the argument because they are too fucking dumb to detect it.GreenRiverGatorz said:
It's like you think that factor wasn't also part of the decision. Of course he could get hurt. Shit, he could get hurt bad enough next year that 2020 and 2021 are completely irrelevant and his career is over. He could get hurt in the 2nd game of 2020 and redshirt the whole year, or he could get hurt in the 5th game of 2020 and we'll sorely wish that we hadn't burned his redshirt this year. All of those are possibilities. I'm sure there are coaches who would put more weight on the future probability of him getting injured and therefore bank on him potentially needing that fifth year, and would have determined that reps against OSU weren't worth more than that future possibility. Other coaches, such as ours, would prioritize getting him as game-ready as possible for the last three game stretch that will make or break the 2018 season.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Again you fucking idiot - he could get injured and play half years you fuckstick. LIKE HE DID THIS YEAR!!! LIKE HE DID LAST YEAR...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Again, if he’s not going to be around in 2021, why the fuck does it matter? The coaches clearly made the assessment that the benefit of getting him more reps to gear up for the Apple Cup outweighed the remote possibility that he comes back for a 5th year. You might disagree with that assessment if you think there is a chance he comes back, but to call it “FUCKING RETARDED” is just standard DDY hysterical hyperbole.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao.
AND PERHAPS THAT COULD PREVENT HIM FROM LEAVING EARLY YOU FUCKING RETARDED COW.
Jesus fucking Christ you coach-defenders are complete fucking idiots.
The point, you dense motherfucker, is that it's a cost-benefit analysis, and different coaches will come to different conclusions. Both conclusions are perfectly valid, though I happen to agree more with the one our coaches came to (and I said as much when Bryant was back for the Stanford game, that I hoped we wouldn't sit him for OSU).
But I should probably know better than that and not get in the way of another self-parodying DDY rant. -
All of Hampton, Irvin, and Gordon are going to be playing next year and our special teams are terrible because we don't have good LB/DB depth to plug in there without burning some redshirts ... I suspect that most of the DBs will continue to get game reps and then move into the 3 year starter realm starting next year
-
He had the sealing block on Gaskin's 80-yard TDBread said:Jas kizer really played every game? I haven't seen him once.
http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=25359255
Edit: better video here. He's lined up as FB: http://www.espn.com/video/clip?id=25358864 -
Jesus fucking christ almost every single thing you typed is so fucking wrongGreenRiverGatorz said:
He's a tweener in the mid-2000s NFL. He's only 5-10 pounds shy of being a prototypical tight end in the modern NFL (and his weight was low this year because he didn't have a full offseason of S&C). Evan Engram has a near identical frame and skillset to Bryant, and was taken in the first round. Teams will absolutely take Bryant in the mid rounds as a tight-end/potential convert to WR. If he actually puts on weight in the next year or two, then he could easily play himself into the first round.HillsboroDuck said:
He's already swole AF. He's not adding 20 more pounds on that frame and maintaining his speed.Tequilla said:I don't think it's a massive reach to think Bryant can gain 20 pounds in the offseason and get up into the 245 pound range ... he'll be a mismatch at the NFL given his size/skill combination as the league moves more to 2 TE situations. He'll never be the primary blocking TE but does it well enough.
I see both sides of the RS discussion. All else being equal, you would have preserved the RS this year. That being said though, if this is a situation where conversations between the kid, family, and coaches suggested that he was leaving after 4 years regardless then it is what it is.
It's not just his weight that's an issue for him at the next level it's his height. Teams want their TE's to present a big target.
He's a classic tweener.
Now, there's enough innovative OCs out there I think somebody will get him and turn him into a monster threat, he's going to have a great career (if he goes the right place), but they probably won't have to use a high pick to do it.
you can easily look up heights, weights and speeds, we have the fucking internet now with legit combine stats that aren't made up.
2015 - 19 TE drafted. Average 6'4 1/8" 251lbs
2016 - 11 TE drafted. Average 6'4 5/8" 251lbs
2017 - 14 TE drafted. Average 6'4 1/2" 252lbs
2018 - 15 TE drafted. Average 6'4 7/8" 253lbs
Evan Engram a 6'3" 235lbs was also called an undersized TE. And it took a season of catching 60+ passes AND then he ran a fucking 4.42 40 to get into the first round at his size... The second fastest 40 time by a TE to Vernon Davis (and only 3rd TE ever to break 4.5)...
Hunter is 6'2" and 225 lbs (UW measurement, and they aren't making him shorter and lighter)
Hunter isnt fucking "5 lbs shy" of being a prototypical NFL tight end, and then you compare him to a guy who isnt even a NFL prototypical TE in Evan Engram.
How fucking stupid can you be. -
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuche...DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
DJ burned Reser's RS in the rose bowl...why? To try and win the rose bowl. It matters you fuctarded millennial . Bryant's RS doesnt matter. Cant u see that? ( Rhetorical) RS's dont matter anymore dipshit!! -
Hunter Bryant playing against Oregon State was a huge mistake. Given the situation now, you have to play him in the Pac-12 championship game and the bowl game. The coaches already blew it.
-
My first Pumpy rant, including predictions about me as bad as his college football picks! I’m all growns up! Thanks buddy! (winky face)puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuch...DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well? -
Hey Claws 797...hit the gate with 329HuskyClaws said:Hunter Bryant playing against Oregon State was a huge mistake. Given the situation now, you have to play him in the Pac-12 championship game and the bowl game. The coaches already blew it.
-
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
DD...lurk around, practice in front of the mirror, then come at pup...the winky eye is from the cumshotDoubleJDawg said:
My first Pumpy rant, including predictions about me as bad as his college football picks! I’m all growns up! Thanks buddy! (winky face)puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuch...DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well? -
Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole. -
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?Doogles said:Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole. -
I'm saying I'm ok with burning the shirt, u ignorant fuck°puppylove_sugarsteel said:
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?Doogles said:Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole. -
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?HuskyClaws said:
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
If they have NFL potential never redshirt because they aren't staying 5 years
Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore
The new rule is legit.
-
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.DoubleJDawg said:
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?HuskyClaws said:
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
Earth to DoubleJ...What Part of RS's dont matter arent you getting? For the trenches yes it still does (there, u learned 2 things today). But we're obviously not talking about that are we?DoubleJDawg said:
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?HuskyClaws said:
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
They'll probably play one or two of the DBs on special teams then play the one(s) who didn't play during the bowl game.insinceredawg said:
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.DoubleJDawg said:
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?HuskyClaws said:
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
Official DPOY. Are you really that stupid and insincere? Suppose Bryant is sitting in your scenario too?insinceredawg said:
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.DoubleJDawg said:
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?HuskyClaws said:
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
That tracker is not completely accurate. -
Yes it is legit pitch. It's why Pete played guys late . Stupid to play frosh early. Every school but Pete's did. One of many reasons Petersen is the best coach in the cuntry, that doesnt have the luxury of 12 '5-stars' a year, a cake-walk schedule and the Citidel in week 11Pitchfork51 said:If they have NFL potential never redshirt because they aren't staying 5 years
Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore
The new rule is legit. -
Bryant isn't a 5th year senior type of talent.HuskyClaws said:Hunter Bryant playing against Oregon State was a huge mistake. Given the situation now, you have to play him in the Pac-12 championship game and the bowl game. The coaches already blew it.
He has early entry NFL talent. His development to date makes him one of the top talents in college football at this moment. -
I'm not agreeing with you. You are a fool.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Yes it is legit pitch. It's why Pete played guys late . Stupid to play frosh early. Every school but Pete's did. One of many reasons Petersen is the best coach in the cuntry, that doesnt have the luxury of 12 '5-stars' a year, a cake-walk schedule and the Citidel in week 11Pitchfork51 said:If they have NFL potential never redshirt because they aren't staying 5 years
Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore
The new rule is legit. -
They only update weights like twice per year and the last time they did was after Hunter had surgery. He weighed 240 last year and probably weighs about 240 now. It doesn't matter that Hunter is a tweener, he's a matchup nightmare and nobody's drafting him to be a mauler as a run blocking TE anyway. The NFL comparison for him is Shannon Sharpe who was 6'2 and a rocked up 230.
-
Pump gets it.puppylove_sugarsteel said:
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuche...DoubleJDawg said:http://sportsourceanalytics.com/playerparticipation/redshirteligibility.php?calculate=true&team=Washington&formSubmitted=true
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play:
- First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far
- However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
DJ burned Reser's RS in the rose bowl...why? To try and win the rose bowl. It matters you fuctarded millennial . Bryant's RS doesnt matter. Cant u see that? ( Rhetorical) RS's dont matter anymore dipshit!! -
You ignorant fuck. Stick to recruiting and let the rest of us manage the roster.Dennis_DeYoung said:
God you are fucking retarded.Baseman said:
Play to win—now.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Stack talent. the best players play and then it’s next man up.
The goal is to win. Hunter Bryant is a difference maker. Players don’t come back after a several month layoff and play at 100%. Playing Bryant against OSU, getting him game reps was the right move. The OSU tune up paid off. He was the leading receiver in the Apple Cup
Redshirt lineman, both sides of the ball. They aren’t ready to play year 1. Ideally they rotate in as RS-SO. If Tuitele or Bandes are the best players we have next year, play them
We redshirted Byron Murphy and he’s leaving. If the team needs Irvin or Gordon to win, play them. If they’re good enough and lose their redshirts, they’ll play three years, and leave as juniors. Murphy will only play two. It’s a great problem to have.
Next man up. Recruit at a high level, reload. Lather, rinse, repeat.
Hunter Bryant will LEAVE when he’s ready to LEAVE. Getting cute and thinking redshirting him will buy an extra year is ignorant and fucktarded. If he’s that good, he’s gone after next year anyway, redshirt or not.
Winning games means more than a redshirt.
-
Pumpy good at this redshirt thingpuppylove_sugarsteel said:
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?Doogles said:Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole. -
This is a good point. I still think he’s a versatile playmaker and that’s where the NFL is headed.Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
I think he will be gone by 2021. Aaron Hernandez is the best player comparison I can think of. He’s a versatile playmaker.Dennis_DeYoung said:
The fact that we have this on the same bored with the monkey shit that is 'Hunter will not be here in 2021 derp derp' is really forwarding my belief that humans are actually 2 different species: one capable of intelligent simulation and abstract reasoning like this wondrous @Houhusky post - and one that has monkey shit for brains and just repeat everything they have heard in slightly different forms.Houhusky said:
He is not getting drafted early as a WRWombat_Guernica said:
He's not a TE in the NFL...Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
especially as a true Jr WR with ~25 games played and <75 catches
Who is the smallest "TE" in the NFL, Niles Paul at 6'1" 245lbs or something? Is that the best comparison? A guy who was returning punts and kickoffs for touchdowns and playing WR at nebraska drafted in the 5th round? What high level pick WR do you want to compare him to?
people are full fucktard dooging thinking Hunter is going to be like 6'6" 250lb OJ Howard blocking like a pro and running a 4.5 40 or 6'3" 236lb Evan Engram catching 60+ passes in a season and running one of the fastest 40 times for a TE ever (both seniors btw) and then leaving as a high draft pick as a junior. Next people are going to start comparing UW recruits still in high school to barry sanders or something... </p>
At this point, you play him to win the Rose Bowl. He should have never seen the field until Oregon State though.
