Hunter Bryant playing against Oregon State was a huge mistake. Given the situation now, you have to play him in the Pac-12 championship game and the bowl game. The coaches already blew it.
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuch...
My first Pumpy rant, including predictions about me as bad as his college football picks! I’m all growns up! Thanks buddy! (winky face)
DD...lurk around, practice in front of the mirror, then come at pup...the winky eye is from the cumshot
Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole.
Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole.
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?
Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole.
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?
I'm saying I'm ok with burning the shirt, u ignorant fuck°
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
That tracker is not completely accurate.
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
That tracker is not completely accurate.
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
That tracker is not completely accurate.
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?
Earth to DoubleJ...What Part of RS's dont matter arent you getting? For the trenches yes it still does (there, u learned 2 things today). But we're obviously not talking about that are we?
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
That tracker is not completely accurate.
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.
They'll probably play one or two of the DBs on special teams then play the one(s) who didn't play during the bowl game.
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
No Freshmen have played in 4 games yet. Irvin, Gordon, Hampton, and Tafisi have played in 3. They are the only Freshmen we have to worry about at this point.
That tracker is not completely accurate.
That’s good to know - but even at 3 games my questions remain - do we play them two more and burn the redshirt, and how did we come to the decision to play them in three games by this point in the season where we have to make this choice?
Technically we didn't know we were going to have 2 more games until last week. My guess is those 4 will sit this week and then play in the bowl game.
Official DPOY. Are you really that stupid and insincere? Suppose Bryant is sitting in your scenario too?
If they have NFL potential never redshirt because they aren't staying 5 years Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore The new rule is legit.
Yes it is legit pitch. It's why Pete played guys late . Stupid to play frosh early. Every school but Pete's did. One of many reasons Petersen is the best coach in the cuntry, that doesnt have the luxury of 12 '5-stars' a year, a cake-walk schedule and the Citidel in week 11
Hunter Bryant playing against Oregon State was a huge mistake. Given the situation now, you have to play him in the Pac-12 championship game and the bowl game. The coaches already blew it.
Bryant isn't a 5th year senior type of talent.
He has early entry NFL talent. His development to date makes him one of the top talents in college football at this moment.
If they have NFL potential never redshirt because they aren't staying 5 years Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore The new rule is legit.
Yes it is legit pitch. It's why Pete played guys late . Stupid to play frosh early. Every school but Pete's did. One of many reasons Petersen is the best coach in the cuntry, that doesnt have the luxury of 12 '5-stars' a year, a cake-walk schedule and the Citidel in week 11
They only update weights like twice per year and the last time they did was after Hunter had surgery. He weighed 240 last year and probably weighs about 240 now. It doesn't matter that Hunter is a tweener, he's a matchup nightmare and nobody's drafting him to be a mauler as a run blocking TE anyway. The NFL comparison for him is Shannon Sharpe who was 6'2 and a rocked up 230.
I’m not quite sure how accurate this is, but if it is true, then the following things stick out with two games left to play: - First, the obvious we all know with Hunter Bryant playing in three games so far - However, Julius Irvin has now apparently played in four games, and Dom Hampton and Kyler Gordon have played in three as well
Let’s put aside for the moment my disgust for try-hard Max Richmond special teams appearances (on the road, in the snow) while keeping Spiker/Bynum/Osborne et.al. on the shelf - we already know Peterman is ready to burn a year of Bryant’s eligibility in pursuit of the shitty Rose Bowl, but do we? think Peterman is going to burn all these freshman DBs scholarships for that pursuit as well?
Any goof, with 329 posts, who calls the rose bowl "shitty' is most likely born after 1999, likely watches husky games from his nerdy dorm (the cool Greek kids are at the game) and lives for soccer. No husky fan would utter those words. Hit the gate Doubledeuche...
DJ burned Reser's RS in the rose bowl...why? To try and win the rose bowl. It matters you fuctarded millennial . Bryant's RS doesnt matter. Cant u see that? ( Rhetorical) RS's dont matter anymore dipshit!!
If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.
Play to win—now.
Stack talent. the best players play and then it’s next man up.
The goal is to win. Hunter Bryant is a difference maker. Players don’t come back after a several month layoff and play at 100%. Playing Bryant against OSU, getting him game reps was the right move. The OSU tune up paid off. He was the leading receiver in the Apple Cup
Redshirt lineman, both sides of the ball. They aren’t ready to play year 1. Ideally they rotate in as RS-SO. If Tuitele or Bandes are the best players we have next year, play them
We redshirted Byron Murphy and he’s leaving. If the team needs Irvin or Gordon to win, play them. If they’re good enough and lose their redshirts, they’ll play three years, and leave as juniors. Murphy will only play two. It’s a great problem to have.
Next man up. Recruit at a high level, reload. Lather, rinse, repeat.
God you are fucking retarded.
You ignorant fuck. Stick to recruiting and let the rest of us manage the roster.
Hunter Bryant will LEAVE when he’s ready to LEAVE. Getting cute and thinking redshirting him will buy an extra year is ignorant and fucktarded. If he’s that good, he’s gone after next year anyway, redshirt or not.
Who is to say the 10 snaps against Oregon State didn't directly give Hunter/coaches the confidence to have him in a position to make the back to back game changing plays in the Apple Cup?
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole.
And he's going to either go pro as a jr or sr. Who cares if he's a RS soph or RS jr when he goes. Isnt it just semantics at that point doublej 380? You get it now? Bryant wont be here as a RS sr anyway u ignorant fuck. Julius Irvin? He'll go as a true jr or sr too. Good players dont stay for RS SR year anymore. It's not the 70's, 80's anymore. Get it now you young cunts that are new to the game, HH?
If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
This is a good point. I still think he’s a versatile playmaker and that’s where the NFL is headed.
If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
He's not a TE in the NFL...
He is not getting drafted early as a WR
especially as a true Jr WR with ~25 games played and <75 catches
Who is the smallest "TE" in the NFL, Niles Paul at 6'1" 245lbs or something? Is that the best comparison? A guy who was returning punts and kickoffs for touchdowns and playing WR at nebraska drafted in the 5th round? What high level pick WR do you want to compare him to?
people are full fucktard dooging thinking Hunter is going to be like 6'6" 250lb OJ Howard blocking like a pro and running a 4.5 40 or 6'3" 236lb Evan Engram catching 60+ passes in a season and running one of the fastest 40 times for a TE ever (both seniors btw) and then leaving as a high draft pick as a junior. Next people are going to start comparing UW recruits still in high school to barry sanders or something... </p>
The fact that we have this on the same bored with the monkey shit that is 'Hunter will not be here in 2021 derp derp' is really forwarding my belief that humans are actually 2 different species: one capable of intelligent simulation and abstract reasoning like this wondrous @Houhusky post - and one that has monkey shit for brains and just repeat everything they have heard in slightly different forms.
I think he will be gone by 2021. Aaron Hernandez is the best player comparison I can think of. He’s a versatile playmaker.
At this point, you play him to win the Rose Bowl. He should have never seen the field until Oregon State though.
Comments
That tracker is not completely accurate.
I get on the surface it's easy to say we didn't need him vs Beav, but there is more at play here than DDY hyperbole.
Or they will always suck and it doesn't matter.
Or running backs. Never eedshirt if they are good.
Not that it matters anymore
The new rule is legit.
He has early entry NFL talent. His development to date makes him one of the top talents in college football at this moment.
Hunter Bryant will LEAVE when he’s ready to LEAVE. Getting cute and thinking redshirting him will buy an extra year is ignorant and fucktarded. If he’s that good, he’s gone after next year anyway, redshirt or not.
Winning games means more than a redshirt.
At this point, you play him to win the Rose Bowl. He should have never seen the field until Oregon State though.