Some interesting redshirt decisions upcoming
Comments
-
He's not a high round WR.Wombat_Guernica said:
He's not a TE in the NFL...Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
I think he's still an NFL TE. -
If Bryant redshirts this year, balls out next, then—presumably draft worthy—he is gone anyway.Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
High round draft eligibles can go as a RS-SOPH or true JR. If the player is 1.ready and 2. adds more value in team wins than an upperclassman, PLAY THEM.
-
You could be right... maybe he's a hybrid... dunno...HillsboroDuck said:
He's not a high round WR.Wombat_Guernica said:
He's not a TE in the NFL...Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
I think he's still an NFL TE.
All I know is I want to win now, as well as later, and we have saved most of the talent we needed to already.
In the end we have no control over the situation though it is interesting fodder for debate. And even if it isn't interesting it is still chinteresting. -
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years. -
God you are fucking retarded.Baseman said:
Play to win—now.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Stack talent. the best players play and then it’s next man up.
The goal is to win. Hunter Bryant is a difference maker. Players don’t come back after a several month layoff and play at 100%. Playing Bryant against OSU, getting him game reps was the right move. The OSU tune up paid off. He was the leading receiver in the Apple Cup
Redshirt lineman, both sides of the ball. They aren’t ready to play year 1. Ideally they rotate in as RS-SO. If Tuitele or Bandes are the best players we have next year, play them
We redshirted Byron Murphy and he’s leaving. If the team needs Irvin or Gordon to win, play them. If they’re good enough and lose their redshirts, they’ll play three years, and leave as juniors. Murphy will only play two. It’s a great problem to have.
Next man up. Recruit at a high level, reload. Lather, rinse, repeat. -
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao. -
Again, if he’s not going to be around in 2021, why the fuck does it matter? The coaches clearly made the assessment that the benefit of getting him more reps to gear up for the Apple Cup outweighed the remote possibility that he comes back for a 5th year. You might disagree with that assessment if you think there is a chance he comes back, but to call it “FUCKING RETARDED” is just standard DDY hysterical hyperbole.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao. -
He is not getting drafted early as a WRWombat_Guernica said:
He's not a TE in the NFL...Houhusky said:
If you cant see that a TE that is a lock to be gone after next year as a true junior needed TWO games to "knock off the rust" against both FURD and OSU then I cant help you.Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
Hunter is great, I get it, everyone wants to suck him off because the cool fags on here talk about doing it all the time...
don't burn resources that don't need to be burned because you think that a guy might leave after next year as a true junior with less games played than any TE drafted in the first 4 rounds, as the shortest, and lightest TE drafted in the past 5+ years.
especially as a true Jr WR with ~25 games played and <75 catches
Who is the smallest "TE" in the NFL, Niles Paul at 6'1" 245lbs or something? Is that the best comparison? A guy who was returning punts and kickoffs for touchdowns and playing WR at nebraska drafted in the 5th round? What high level pick WR do you want to compare him to?
people are full fucktard dooging thinking Hunter is going to be like 6'6" 250lb OJ Howard blocking like a pro and running a 4.5 40 or 6'3" 236lb Evan Engram catching 60+ passes in a season and running one of the fastest 40 times for a TE ever (both seniors btw) and then leaving as a high draft pick as a junior. Next people are going to start comparing UW recruits still in high school to barry sanders or something... -
Again you fucking idiot - he could get injured and play half years you fuckstick. LIKE HE DID THIS YEAR!!! LIKE HE DID LAST YEAR...GreenRiverGatorz said:
Again, if he’s not going to be around in 2021, why the fuck does it matter? The coaches clearly made the assessment that the benefit of getting him more reps to gear up for the Apple Cup outweighed the remote possibility that he comes back for a 5th year. You might disagree with that assessment if you think there is a chance he comes back, but to call it “FUCKING RETARDED” is just standard DDY hysterical hyperbole.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao.
AND PERHAPS THAT COULD PREVENT HIM FROM LEAVING EARLY YOU FUCKING RETARDED COW.
Jesus fucking Christ you coach-defenders are complete fucking idiots. -
Trust the coaches POTDGreenRiverGatorz said:
Again, if he’s not going to be around in 2021, why the fuck does it matter? The coaches clearly made the assessment that the benefit of getting him more reps to gear up for the Apple Cup outweighed the remote possibility that he comes back for a 5th year. You might disagree with that assessment if you think there is a chance he comes back, but to call it “FUCKING RETARDED” is just standard DDY hysterical hyperbole.Dennis_DeYoung said:
Anyone who thinks that we had to play him for a couple series vs. OSU is a fucking complete idiot and should be banned.GreenRiverGatorz said:
Disagree. The coaches clearly don’t think Bryant is the kind of guy who’s going to stick around for a 5th year. After seeing him dominate athletically inferior defenders on Friday, I think that’s a pretty spot-on assessment. Why preserve a redshirt year for a guy who won’t use it?Dennis_DeYoung said:
We have to play Hunter, but playing him against Cal and OSU was FUCKING RETARDED.Wombat_Guernica said:If we need to burn redshirts to get to a Rose Bowl so be it.... this is what we play for
Hunter Bryant is likely gone after next season so that discussion is pointless... he isn't staying for five years.
And that includes Paopao.
fuck off
You are probably going to die of AIDS before you ever collect a penny of retirement, might as well cash out now and OD on bath salts.
you can't predict with cock you will be gargling during your lunch break let alone what will happen by 2021. Ensuring he wont be around for 2021 so he could play like 6 snaps against stanford or play against a pointless oregon state was fucktarded.




