Do I have this right?
Petersen come in gets busy, and doesn't have the time to feed Kim's ego. But is working full time do get his staff on place and recruiting. Now dm.com (Kim and ecklund) and saying this was going to be a gear class before sark left, Petersen isn't getting the guys sark had lined up, and it is willingham II .
Did I get that right. If so, dm.com needs to be distanced from the program and have the credentials revoked. The AD needs to realize dm.com isn't a friend of the program, but a self serving vehicle for middle aged men who think they are "connected" to the program and are I the inner circle. When they realize they aren't, then they turn into little bitches who act like they got kicked off the cool table in the lunch room.
15 games, win or GTFO.
Comments
-
I'm thinking when Kim "accidentally" left his coat in Pete's office it didn't go over too well.
-
Looks like you pretty much nailed it.
-
Yes, you have it right.
-
Pretty sure their credentials were passively revoked when petersen got hired, hence their passive aggressive flailing.
Again don't give a shit about them, but fuck any of you who give them money, you are part of the problem. -
Yes, you got it all correct. That and the telling paying customers not to sound pissed off when they point this out on the higher discussion bored
-
They probably found the running tape recorder.CuntWaffle said:I'm thinking when Kim "accidentally" left his coat in Pete's office it didn't go over too well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ok7SpbRhbA
-
Kim bugged the HC's office? Diabolical!dnc said:
They probably found the running tape recorder.CuntWaffle said:I'm thinking when Kim "accidentally" left his coat in Pete's office it didn't go over too well.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_ok7SpbRhbA -
Sark was a loser. Kim is a bigger loser who stalks teen boys.MikeDamone said:
15 games, win or GTFO.
I am intrigued by this 15 games, win or GTFO.
is that 8-7? 11-4? 12-3? 15-0?
10-3 would be a logical expectation next year, with a bowl win makes 11-3 ... game one of the following year is likely a cupcake.
Three years is a good barometer for a coach ... after that you know what you got. -
let's remember to keep our AD apprised of his responsibility too.
-
You are correct on all accounts.
I will admit to being a DM.c subscriber, but I couldn't take it anymore this AM when "staff" compared Pedersen to Lionel. The most head-in-ass thing I have heard over there, and it came from a person that owns the place. I tried to cancel on the spot, but I have to call someone to do that, which seems fucking bullshit. I will get around to it, but Im pretty lazy.
I was meh on Sarkisian, he lost me after the pillaging we took in Tempe. But some of these idiots are so fucking stupid, they are seriously upset we hired a coach that is 92-12 in his career because he didn't keep a bunch of coaches that helped us go 5-4 in conference for the 3rd year in a row, and hasn't landed a 5-star his first week on the job.
I guess they are pissed because Petersen actually started working when he was hired and not coaching our competitors, or because he didn't go golfing.
Bat. Shit. Crazy. -
I will be writing s letter to Petersen, his recruiting coordinator, and KJR about this bullshit
-
13 games with the Hawaii game, plus one for conference championship game, plus one for bowel = 15.topdawgnc said:
Sark was a loser. Kim is a bigger loser who stalks teen boys.MikeDamone said:
15 games, win or GTFO.
I am intrigued by this 15 games, win or GTFO.
is that 8-7? 11-4? 12-3? 15-0?
10-3 would be a logical expectation next year, with a bowl win makes 11-3 ... game one of the following year is likely a cupcake.
Three years is a good barometer for a coach ... after that you know what you got.
I think expecting a North division championship is reasonable. It's way past time we put our doogish expectations aside don't you think? -
Strongly word that sucker. But go light on gaping twat and rusty cunt references.bananasnblondes said:I will be writing s letter to Petersen, his recruiting coordinator, and KJR about this bullshit
-
You got the history and Dm.c's hypocrisy or self-serving Internet nuance about right, but although I've moved on to elderly, I have to take exception to the middle aged men reference. I don't know how Dm.c's insider circle arrived at where they're at nor do I care what their agenda is in the future. It appears that UW's young AD may be on the way to completing his training if his latest coaching hire works out the way we hope and expect and it appears a far too often indifferent UW administration is at least supportive and willing to get out of our way back to glory.MikeDamone said:The AD needs to realize dm.com isn't a friend of the program, but a self serving vehicle for middle aged men who think they are "connected" to the program and are I the inner circle. When they realize they aren't, then they turn into little bitches who act like they got kicked off the cool table in the lunch room.
It can be no great surprise that Internet websites providing us with usually suspect insider news and some message board space to discuss our favorite football program are at best small things of little or no consequence to the at large mob of paying Husky Football fanatics. We always knew that, right? And does it not follow that when Husky Football is back where our comfort has always resided, on a bandwagon going somewhere exciting every season, there can be no single privileged club of media groupies hanging around claiming to have any kind of authoritative knowledge on why it is that Husky footballers typically win without beating themselves or playing the game like keystone cops.
When the Pride and Fever have fully returned and the winning is good, nobody sees and understands it better than Huskyfans watching live from their seats on gamedays(or nights) or sitting home in front of the TV. And as for details concerning recruiting, player development, and depth, WTF cares when the scoreboard is typically in our favor as it should be. Very few fans other than rabid recruitniques care about a Husky's recruit's starpower so long as he and his teammates are winners. If he can, Coach Pete will protect his program from football ignorant Internet nerds and scandal hunting piranha breaths, thus keeping Husky Football as purely football as possible for the true fans....... us.
-
I'm no doog ... and I'll be called one ... so be it.TheHB said:
13 games with the Hawaii game, plus one for conference championship game, plus one for bowel = 15.topdawgnc said:
Sark was a loser. Kim is a bigger loser who stalks teen boys.MikeDamone said:
15 games, win or GTFO.
I am intrigued by this 15 games, win or GTFO.
is that 8-7? 11-4? 12-3? 15-0?
10-3 would be a logical expectation next year, with a bowl win makes 11-3 ... game one of the following year is likely a cupcake.
Three years is a good barometer for a coach ... after that you know what you got.
I think expecting a North division championship is reasonable. It's way past time we put our doogish expectations aside don't you think?
First year QB, a new RB, no real chance to upgrade the lines ... those are tall orders going up against ASU, Stanford, and Oregon.
I do believe we are better positioned under Coach Pete.
I do believe he will be a winner.
I won't judge him after one year (unless he totally shits the bed ... i.e. 8 wins or less). By year three I expect a Rose Bowl ... if one comes sooner ... GREAT! Then I expect that level of excellence for as long as he coaches here. -
The 15 game thing is BS unless we're fed the same weak undisciplined slop we've seen for five years.
Year two will be very telling as it was with Shark. However, year three is BCS bowl or hit the frigin road. (Shark shit the bed in year three, jury in.)topdawgnc said:
I'm no doog ... and I'll be called one ... so be it.TheHB said:
13 games with the Hawaii game, plus one for conference championship game, plus one for bowel = 15.topdawgnc said:
Sark was a loser. Kim is a bigger loser who stalks teen boys.MikeDamone said:
15 games, win or GTFO.
I am intrigued by this 15 games, win or GTFO.
is that 8-7? 11-4? 12-3? 15-0?
10-3 would be a logical expectation next year, with a bowl win makes 11-3 ... game one of the following year is likely a cupcake.
Three years is a good barometer for a coach ... after that you know what you got.
I think expecting a North division championship is reasonable. It's way past time we put our doogish expectations aside don't you think?
First year QB, a new RB, no real chance to upgrade the lines ... those are tall orders going up against ASU, Stanford, and Oregon.
I do believe we are better positioned under Coach Pete.
I do believe he will be a winner.
I won't judge him after one year (unless he totally shits the bed ... i.e. 8 wins or less). By year three I expect a Rose Bowl ... if one comes sooner ... GREAT! Then I expect that level of excellence for as long as he coaches here. -
With the team this year corky almost managed to beat stanford. Oregon is a dumpster fire (you may infer from the handle I was at the UA game.) ASU appears to be hemorrhaging players next year if the depth chart I just read was at all accurate. And my dad (doog supreme) keeps telling me how great cyler miles is (i have no fucking idea if that's true I didn't see him play at all) but next year is as good a year as any to win the north.
-
Don't be a Twister.
-
Who the fuck is Petersen?! I've heard our coach is Peterman. Staff true?!
-
huskyad@uw.edu
-
Yale, is that you?BayDawg said:You are correct on all accounts.
I will admit to being a DM.c subscriber, but I couldn't take it anymore this AM when "staff" compared Pedersen to Lionel. The most head-in-ass thing I have heard over there, and it came from a person that owns the place. I tried to cancel on the spot, but I have to call someone to do that, which seems fucking bullshit. I will get around to it, but Im pretty lazy.
I was meh on Sarkisian, he lost me after the pillaging we took in Tempe. But some of these idiots are so fucking stupid, they are seriously upset we hired a coach that is 92-12 in his career because he didn't keep a bunch of coaches that helped us go 5-4 in conference for the 3rd year in a row, and hasn't landed a 5-star his first week on the job.
I guess they are pissed because Petersen actually started working when he was hired and not coaching our competitors, or because he didn't go golfing.
Bat. Shit. Crazy.
-
We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).
-
15 games is the perfect number. Game #15 for Sark was when he was embarrassed at home by Nebraska. If you haven't figured it out by then we can't help you.MikeDamone said:We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).
-
I concur.MikeDamone said:We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).
-
Sark proved he was an awful coach by the 13th game at BYU to be fair but I agree with you guys on 15 games.allpurpleallgold said:
15 games is the perfect number. Game #15 for Sark was when he was embarrassed at home by Nebraska. If you haven't figured it out by then we can't help you.MikeDamone said:We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).
-
8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.
We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up.
-
PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.
Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.
Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine. -
Sark couldn't win more than 8 games because Sark sucks. HTH.puppylove_sugarsteel said:8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.
We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up. -
Jusy when I think you can't get any dumber, you do something like this and totally fucktard yourselfpuppylove_sugarsteel said:8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.
We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up. -
He_Needs_More_Time said:
PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.
Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.
Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine.
Stop stating the obvious. same ole' "we have these guys coming back, we should be better"! That's what dogs say. READ MY FUCKING POST AGAIN and comprehend.!!!He_Needs_More_Time said:PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.
Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.
Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine.
New coach, new system, new qb who hasn't shown me a lot, in limited reps however, and the loss of quite possibly UW'S best tailback since the nipper. Don't just assume shit. It makes you sound more ignant than you are. Fuck you gays, be realistic. Anything over 7-8 wins shouldn't be expected. Would I be disappointed? Yes. But coaches get a 4-5 year plan. Peterman is no different.
Do they have the talent to win the north? Fuck yeah, and they could. I just don't see Miles as ready to win big games yet. Why? Because there's nothing I've seen from him to make me believe he can. We will know after spring, fall and the OOC. Pretty sound logic there More_Cock and balls.
![[Deleted User]](https://wb.vanillicon.com/b14605887e2b6b59902271a0095c9265_100.png)
