Welcome to the Hardcore Husky Forums. Folks who are well-known in Cyberland and not that dumb.

Do I have this right?

135678

Comments

  • loadsock
    loadsock Member Posts: 686
    BayDawg said:

    You are correct on all accounts.

    I will admit to being a DM.c subscriber, but I couldn't take it anymore this AM when "staff" compared Pedersen to Lionel. The most head-in-ass thing I have heard over there, and it came from a person that owns the place. I tried to cancel on the spot, but I have to call someone to do that, which seems fucking bullshit. I will get around to it, but Im pretty lazy.

    I was meh on Sarkisian, he lost me after the pillaging we took in Tempe. But some of these idiots are so fucking stupid, they are seriously upset we hired a coach that is 92-12 in his career because he didn't keep a bunch of coaches that helped us go 5-4 in conference for the 3rd year in a row, and hasn't landed a 5-star his first week on the job.

    I guess they are pissed because Petersen actually started working when he was hired and not coaching our competitors, or because he didn't go golfing.

    Bat. Shit. Crazy.

    Yale, is that you?

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • MikeDamone
    MikeDamone Member Posts: 37,781
    We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    MikeDamone said:

    We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).

    15 games is the perfect number. Game #15 for Sark was when he was embarrassed at home by Nebraska. If you haven't figured it out by then we can't help you.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • topdawgnc
    topdawgnc Member Posts: 7,841
    MikeDamone said:

    We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).

    I concur.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    allpurpleallgold said:

    MikeDamone said:

    We will know after 15 games. No, it's not 15-0. But it's a solid first year with excellent talent. Should be a 10 win year. No blowouts. Then start the next season convincingly. (I.e. Not needing a last minute drive to beat Ewu).

    15 games is the perfect number. Game #15 for Sark was when he was embarrassed at home by Nebraska. If you haven't figured it out by then we can't help you.
    Sark proved he was an awful coach by the 13th game at BYU to be fair but I agree with you guys on 15 games.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.

    We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up.

    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • [Deleted User]
    [Deleted User] Posts: 11,453
    PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.

    Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.

    Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • allpurpleallgold
    allpurpleallgold Member Posts: 8,771
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.

    We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up.

    Sark couldn't win more than 8 games because Sark sucks. HTH.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • LoneStarDawg
    LoneStarDawg Member, Swaye's Wigwam Posts: 13,775 Founders Club
    puppylove_sugarsteel said:

    8 wins or less? Do you understand how this works? A new head coach, no identifiable starting qb (Miles isn't taking this team to the rose bowl next year). I bitched every week the last 2 years about Sark completely botching the back up QB situation, and it got me banned, among a weekly banning for other shit. Nobody listened.. Now we get a QB with 1 start and a few additional forward passes next year and NOBODY else. Plus a new tailback and TE.

    We have talent no doubt, but be fucking realistic. Sark couldn't win more than 8 games with a senior qb, Sankey and ASJ, why should Peterman less those players? I can't stand you blind mothafucka's. Smarten the hell up.

    Jusy when I think you can't get any dumber, you do something like this and totally fucktard yourself
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter
  • puppylove_sugarsteel
    puppylove_sugarsteel Member Posts: 9,133
    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.

    Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.

    Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine.

    He_Needs_More_Time said:

    PLSS, we have an easy schedule. We also return all 5 OL who will be coached up for the first time since well ever, we also return our entire front 7 which again with real coaching I expect to be much improved.

    Miles won't be as accurate as Price but he'll make up for it with his scrambling.

    Sankey is a huge loss but a committee of Washington, Callier, Cooper and Coleman(4 star who redshirted) should be just fine.

    Stop stating the obvious. same ole' "we have these guys coming back, we should be better"! That's what dogs say. READ MY FUCKING POST AGAIN and comprehend.!!!

    New coach, new system, new qb who hasn't shown me a lot, in limited reps however, and the loss of quite possibly UW'S best tailback since the nipper. Don't just assume shit. It makes you sound more ignant than you are. Fuck you gays, be realistic. Anything over 7-8 wins shouldn't be expected. Would I be disappointed? Yes. But coaches get a 4-5 year plan. Peterman is no different.

    Do they have the talent to win the north? Fuck yeah, and they could. I just don't see Miles as ready to win big games yet. Why? Because there's nothing I've seen from him to make me believe he can. We will know after spring, fall and the OOC. Pretty sound logic there More_Cock and balls.
    · Share on FacebookShare on Twitter