Who should LEAVE!

DUCKSareOVERRATED said:

RoadDawg55 said:

DUCKSareOVERRATED said:

Meek said:

can't we just complain to the mods so they get muted like those fagtards complained to grinolds and fatters about us?

Everyone complained about you. And Damone. The place is better with you guys gone.

The place sucks. First of all, it's three main mods/contibutors playing musical chairs. However, for their version of this game, they substitute chairs with key UW coaches and AD's asses. When the music stops, they must find one of these asses to place their head in. Luckily, there are enough asses so that nobody ever loses. None of them have to worry about not having an ass to stick their head up.

Does that sound like an accurate analogy to their defending every coach and AD's every move and performance? I can take some defending, but every fucking time? When we are 7-6 every year? When we get blown out by 30+ 3-4 times every year? When our OL sucks every year? When we advertise tickets with Crazy Larry? Criticism is certainly deserved after many of our performances.

If you can get past that, you get great, insightful posts about how special this year is going to be. Ignore all of the hard evidence from the past, this year is going to be special because Section 14A, DaveF, UWSuperfan, ladyhawks, and Howl4Dawgs think it will be. Sounds like a great place to me.

So, what's your agenda? The guys at DM re HUSKY fans and support the program. You bitch about them and the program.

It's too bad that you actually need to ask that question. The agenda is to have a forum for an honest discussion about the pluses and minuses of Husky football. You can no longer have that over on the other website. kim's sole motivation is to be "accepted" by the powers-that-be on Montlake, and to get his occasional pat on the head he must censor and spin like a Soviet-era newspaper.

He also can't take criticism. It's unbelievable - he actually bans people for calling bullshit on his contradictory statements. What a thin-skinned man he is.

The bottom line is that everyone here wants Husky Football to be successful, but simply applauding Sark like a bunch of Kim Jong-Un supporters isn't the way to do it. A real football forum doesn't censor a subscriber, but rather allows other subscribers to point out where the subscriber is being stupid. THAT IS HOW FREE SPEECH IS SUPPOSED TO WORK!

Unfortunately Mr. Small Man's Syndrome doesn't see it that way, and has ruined his website in the process.

If the Huskies can pull out a 9 or 10 win season this fall AND land some decent OL recruits (I won't hold my breath) you will see me and I'm sure several others cheering and jumping up and down on this message board. Or, you can simply go to doucheman.com where they do it regardless of how successful the program is.

RoadDawg55 said:

Passion said:

DUCKSareOVERRATED said:

RoadDawg55 said:

DUCKSareOVERRATED said:

Meek said:

can't we just complain to the mods so they get muted like those fagtards complained to grinolds and fatters about us?

Everyone complained about you. And Damone. The place is better with you guys gone.

The place sucks. First of all, it's three main mods/contibutors playing musical chairs. However, for their version of this game, they substitute chairs with key UW coaches and AD's asses. When the music stops, they must find one of these asses to place their head in. Luckily, there are enough asses so that nobody ever loses. None of them have to worry about not having an ass to stick their head up.

Does that sound like an accurate analogy to their defending every coach and AD's every move and performance? I can take some defending, but every fucking time? When we are 7-6 every year? When we get blown out by 30+ 3-4 times every year? When our OL sucks every year? When we advertise tickets with Crazy Larry? Criticism is certainly deserved after many of our performances.

If you can get past that, you get great, insightful posts about how special this year is going to be. Ignore all of the hard evidence from the past, this year is going to be special because Section 14A, DaveF, UWSuperfan, ladyhawks, and Howl4Dawgs think it will be. Sounds like a great place to me.

So, what's your agenda? The guys at DM re HUSKY fans and support the program. You bitch about them and the program.

It's too bad that you actually need to ask that question. The agenda is to have a forum for an honest discussion about the pluses and minuses of Husky football. You can no longer have that over on the other website. kim's sole motivation is to be "accepted" by the powers-that-be on Montlake, and to get his occasional pat on the head he must censor and spin like a Soviet-era newspaper.

He also can't take criticism. It's unbelievable - he actually bans people for calling bullshit on his contradictory statements. What a thin-skinned man he is.

The bottom line is that everyone here wants Husky Football to be successful, but simply applauding Sark like a bunch of Kim Jong-Un supporters isn't the way to do it. A real football forum doesn't censor a subscriber, but rather allows other subscribers to point out where the subscriber is being stupid. THAT IS HOW FREE SPEECH IS SUPPOSED TO WORK!

Unfortunately Mr. Small Man's Syndrome doesn't see it that way, and has ruined his website in the process.

If the Huskies can pull out a 9 or 10 win season this fall AND land some decent OL recruits (I won't hold my breath) you will see me and I'm sure several others cheering and jumping up and down on this message board. Or, you can simply go to doucheman.com where they do it regardless of how successful the program is.

Absolutely. I still love Husky football and will be pumped for the season to begin once fall camp begins. If we start playing smart, physical, disciplined football, I will change my tune and will have no problem admitting I jumped the gun with Sark.

To be honest, I've reached a tipping point on my feelings with Sark. I jumped off the Sark bandwagon when we lost Banner and Garnett, and it got worse when we lost Myles Jack, Max Browne, and that douchebag CB from Everett that went to notre dame. His teams have basically plateaued on the field, and there have been too many in-state recruiting losses and sub-par OL recruiting classes.

When you consider all the good players that Sark recruited (that I listed the other day, with Damone's addendum), I don't really consider this team to be demonstrably better than the team he inherited. That team in 2009 could've easily won 6 or 7 games.

However, I will give credit where credit is due. Sark has made football enjoyable for his players, whereas willingham made it miserable. I also don't know if we'd be playing in a new stadium this year if it hadn't been for his enthusiasm. He's done some good things.

So now I feel like I'm balancing myself on the top of a picket fence - waiting for a stiff breeze to push me one way or the other. Will the breeze be more recruiting losses, another substandard O-line class and a 7-6 record? OR, will we turn the corner?

Steve_Bowman said:

As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.

However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.

Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?

TheKobeStopper said:

Steve_Bowman said:

As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.

However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.

Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?

When Sark's lost the one HHB who supported his hire, he's lost the fanbase.

This thread delivers

Good, but sad point. Cream Puff will never see a BCS field unless he's an assistant.

TierbsHsotBoobs said:

Steve_Bowman said:

Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.

Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.

TheKobeStopper said:

Steve_Bowman said:

As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.

However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.

Ty has more Rose Bowl appearances and Coach of the Year awards than Sark.

Just saying.

bananasnblondes said:

I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.

If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"

8 is the disaster scenario. Its failure yet improvement to some people. How Woodward handles the next offseason is critical.

Steve_Bowman said:

Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.

Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.

TheKobeStopper said:

Steve_Bowman said:

As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.

However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.

Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?

I know all you nega dawgs like to rewrite history and act like Ty was the worst coach ever but the truth is he was the definition of mediocore. That was the entire objection to him being hired.

0-12 was a complete debacle (and another 0-12 is clearly needed) and the majority of the blame is on Ty's shoulders but he's not the reason Locker got hurt and it wasn't his decision to bring back a lame duck coach. His career record without 0-12 is 76-76-1. Sark is Ty.