As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.
However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.
Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?
When Sark's lost the one HHB who supported his hire, he's lost the fanbase.
Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.
Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.
As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.
However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.
Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?
can't we just complain to the mods so they get muted like those fagtards complained to grinolds and fatters about us?
Everyone complained about you. And Damone. The place is better with you guys gone.
The place sucks. First of all, it's three main mods/contibutors playing musical chairs. However, for their version of this game, they substitute chairs with key UW coaches and AD's asses. When the music stops, they must find one of these asses to place their head in. Luckily, there are enough asses so that nobody ever loses. None of them have to worry about not having an ass to stick their head up.
Does that sound like an accurate analogy to their defending every coach and AD's every move and performance? I can take some defending, but every fucking time? When we are 7-6 every year? When we get blown out by 30+ 3-4 times every year? When our OL sucks every year? When we advertise tickets with Crazy Larry? Criticism is certainly deserved after many of our performances.
If you can get past that, you get great, insightful posts about how special this year is going to be. Ignore all of the hard evidence from the past, this year is going to be special because Section 14A, DaveF, UWSuperfan, ladyhawks, and Howl4Dawgs think it will be. Sounds like a great place to me.
So, what's your agenda? The guys at DM re HUSKY fans and support the program. You bitch about them and the program.
If you've consistently supported the steaming shit sandwich that the program has served over the last 11 years, you deserve to die in a fucking fire.
Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.
Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.
As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.
However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.
Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?
Ty has more Rose Bowl appearances and Coach of the Year awards than Sark.
I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.
Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.
As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.
However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.
Ty has more Rose Bowl appearances and Coach of the Year awards than Sark.
I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
Did you copy/paste this post from the summer of 2012?
I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
8 is the disaster scenario. Its failure yet improvement to some people. How Woodward handles the next offseason is critical.
I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
8 is the disaster scenario. Its failure yet improvement to some people. How Woodward handles the next offseason is critical.
Eight is not improvement "to some people". Eight from 7, 7, 7 is improvement, period. It's basically the definition.
The problem is that doogs believe improvement = success. When you're talking gaining one win over four years, not the case.
I am still holding onto the tiniest glimmer of hope that Sark can have a big year next year or that Wilcox's defense (paired with a mediocre offense) will win us a lot of games. This season the recruiting/program pendulum will begin falling one way or another. If we win 10 games, I do think we will have a very good recruiting class and have genuine excitement about the program.
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
8 is the disaster scenario. Its failure yet improvement to some people. How Woodward handles the next offseason is critical.
Eight is not improvement "to some people". Eight from 7, 7, 7 is improvement, period. It's basically the definition.
The problem is that doogs believe improvement = success. When you're talking gaining one win over four years, not the case.
Have you looked at the OOC schedule this year? 8 is the new 7.
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
Yeah...that's not going to happen.
Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1
Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
Yeah...that's not going to happen.
Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1
Wilcox could be great but we won't find out until he takes the DC job at some SEC school and wins a couple title games.
Holt could have been great too based on his usc time
Could Cream Puff go 10 & 2 twice? We'll never find out, but I suspect so if he does it once.
Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.
As I've said (probably too often) there is zero hope that Cream Puff will produce anything but marginal teams. The heart of warrior is not something you can develop and learn in your 30s. You have it or you don't at his stage in life. Steve does not. His softness precludes being a warrior/fierce competitor.
However, if he's 10 - 2 this year, I'll eat massive amounts of crow and be happy to do so. 9 - 3 plus a bowl win will make me think twice about the grim outlook.
Fuck that. Sarks a mediocore coach. The stars could align and UW could have a bunch of good luck, like Ty did when he went 10-3 one year at Notre Dame, and Sark could get to 10 wins but that's no reason to eat crow. Ask yourself this, could you ever see a Sark led team winning 10 games in back to back seasons?
I know all you nega dawgs like to rewrite history and act like Ty was the worst coach ever but the truth is he was the definition of mediocore. That was the entire objection to him being hired.
0-12 was a complete debacle (and another 0-12 is clearly needed) and the majority of the blame is on Ty's shoulders but he's not the reason Locker got hurt and it wasn't his decision to bring back a lame duck coach. His career record without 0-12 is 76-76-1. Sark is Ty.
Comments
Actually, the Welfare Rat went 9 - 3 in 2001 including a bowl loss, his best. He had a couple of losing seasons before that. Cream Puff is at least mediocre....the Ty'ster wasn't fit to be a high school assistant.
Hope this helps.
Just saying.
This is a quality, classy bored and I look forward to all your posts. (Except DaO and that Puppylove bestiality guy)
If we win 7, 8 or less, you can expect a terrible recruiting class, and Sark will be a complete lame-duck. Hopefully at that point, Woodward has the sense to tell Sark "go look for an NFL QB coach/coordinator job if you don't want to be fired"
The problem is that doogs believe improvement = success. When you're talking gaining one win over four years, not the case.
Justin Wilcox becomes our defensive Chip Kelly.
We have a great season but it is because our D is top in the Pac while our Offense is somewhere in the middle (performing well when they need to with a little luck on our side). At the end of the year Sark,Woody, and everyone else see the writing on the wall. Sark, with the urging/blessing of the UW athletic department takes a job in the NFL. Wilcox is elevated to HC, Sirmon to DC, Tosh is given extra recruiting duties, Cozetto and Nansen are sent to the glue factory, Wilcox hires an OL coach and RB coach with recruiting/on the field results
Wilcox isn't that great. Neither is tosh.1
0-12 was a complete debacle (and another 0-12 is clearly needed) and the majority of the blame is on Ty's shoulders but he's not the reason Locker got hurt and it wasn't his decision to bring back a lame duck coach. His career record without 0-12 is 76-76-1. Sark is Ty.