Jordan Peterson Reacts to ALEX JONES Being DEPLATFORMED

ThomasFremont said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Fuck off

Exactly what I thought. I'm down for Rather being fired and Olberman is an asshat. Just wondering why the other side doesn't feel like they are held to the same standard. Or that the shit Alex Jones says it's ok but Olberman should be fired.

Alex Jones is an asshat too.

Doesn't mean he needs to get banned on youtube. Put the crazies out there to be exposed for what they are - asshats.

I always wonder why the left is afraid to let ideas rise and fall on their own merit.













Actually, I don't wonder.

Are you serious? How’s universal healthcare being allowed to rise and fall on its own merit? “Extreme leftism!” With a 60% approval rating. “How are you going to pay for it!?” When even the Koch brothers can’t fund a study that shows it would cost more than our current system.

If you think this is a left problem and not an everyone problem you’re dumb as fuck.

Universal Healthcare did rise. A LOT. That is our current system. Thanks Obama!
Your employer must pay that bill for you if you're unaware.


Are we? done talking about oranges when the original conversation was about apples?




Free speech, and the de-platforming of ideas is being done unilaterally along stark political lines. If you cant's see that, than HondoFuckingStupid.

This is 1000% an everyone problem, because like usual, the left isn't paying attention to the "unintended" consequences the right saw coming from a country mile.

Or the consequences WERE intended, which we can't rule out either.

I don’t want to be a dick but it doesn’t seem like you know what universal healthcare is or what free speech means.

You and I both know the nomenclature Universal Healthcare encompasses a lot of things. It is what was promised with Obamacare - and we know how that turned out - which is my poont.

If you want it to mean some variant of the single-payer model, whereby the providers have to compete for the business, then sign me up. Until then, the current model is only going to cost more and more and more.


I seem to care more about actual free speech than those on the left who are so afraid of opposing views they would rather have their opposition silenced. So I think I have that covered.

But you're always welcome to show me the light.



I'll wait, Richard.

This is cute coming from the guy that wants to ban people.

UWhuskytskeet said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

allpurpleallgold said:

pawz said:

PurpleThrobber said:

2001400ex said:

RaceBannon said:

Fuck off

Exactly what I thought. I'm down for Rather being fired and Olberman is an asshat. Just wondering why the other side doesn't feel like they are held to the same standard. Or that the shit Alex Jones says it's ok but Olberman should be fired.

Alex Jones is an asshat too.

Doesn't mean he needs to get banned on youtube. Put the crazies out there to be exposed for what they are - asshats.

I always wonder why the left is afraid to let ideas rise and fall on their own merit.













Actually, I don't wonder.

Are you serious? How’s universal healthcare being allowed to rise and fall on its own merit? “Extreme leftism!” With a 60% approval rating. “How are you going to pay for it!?” When even the Koch brothers can’t fund a study that shows it would cost more than our current system.

If you think this is a left problem and not an everyone problem you’re dumb as fuck.

Universal Healthcare did rise. A LOT. That is our current system. Thanks Obama!
Your employer must pay that bill for you if you're unaware.


Are we? done talking about oranges when the original conversation was about apples?




Free speech, and the de-platforming of ideas is being done unilaterally along stark political lines. If you cant's see that, than HondoFuckingStupid.

This is 1000% an everyone problem, because like usual, the left isn't paying attention to the "unintended" consequences the right saw coming from a country mile.

Or the consequences WERE intended, which we can't rule out either.

I don’t want to be a dick but it doesn’t seem like you know what universal healthcare is or what free speech means.

You and I both know the nomenclature Universal Healthcare encompasses a lot of things. It is what was promised with Obamacare - and we know how that turned out - which is my poont.

If you want it to mean some variant of the single-payer model, whereby the providers have to compete for the business, then sign me up. Until then, the current model is only going to cost more and more and more.


I seem to care more about actual free speech than those on the left who are so afraid of opposing views they would rather have their opposition silenced. So I think I have that covered.

But you're always welcome to show me the light.



I'll wait, Richard.

WTF? This board is so fucking weird. Less than 10% of people are covered by Obamacare. How the fuck is that universal? My god.