Supposedly we? stopped recruiting him because he just didn't seem interested.FWIW Taj Davis has been hitting him up trying to get him to join up and that got Kyle's interested piqued and that started Hamdan and Lubick jumping back in.He's visiting in early September against North Dakota, so I don't see us? leap frogging USC and Oregon. Still chinteresting that we? got a player in his ear and we? got Hamdan on him. Hamdan has landed the last 6 WR (laid the ground work for Spiker, Ozzy, and Lowe).
Supposedly we? stopped recruiting him because he just didn't seem interested.FWIW Taj Davis has been hitting him up trying to get him to join up and that got Kyle's interested piqued and that started Hamdan and Lubick jumping back in.He's visiting in early September against North Dakota, so I don't see us? leap frogging USC and Oregon. Still chinteresting that we? got a player in his ear and we? got Hamdan on him. Hamdan has landed the last 6 WR (laid the ground work for Spiker, Ozzy, and Lowe). Actually, Biggins said we got back in it because Dante Pettis' old brother and former petersen player austin pettis is his coach and he and dante have been pressuring him to check out uw.
Supposedly we? stopped recruiting him because he just didn't seem interested.FWIW Taj Davis has been hitting him up trying to get him to join up and that got Kyle's interested piqued and that started Hamdan and Lubick jumping back in.He's visiting in early September against North Dakota, so I don't see us? leap frogging USC and Oregon. Still chinteresting that we? got a player in his ear and we? got Hamdan on him. Hamdan has landed the last 6 WR (laid the ground work for Spiker, Ozzy, and Lowe). Actually, Biggins said we got back in it because Dante Pettis' old brother and former petersen player austin pettis is his coach and he and dante have been pressuring him to check out uw. Moving from Servite to Orange Lutheran is good for us. Getting a new coach that beats for pete is a bonus.If the coaches want this guy I think we have a good chance.Plus his neck is longer then Kevin Kings
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW.
How about the argument of having one of the best dB rooms around helping develop WRs?Is that a thing?
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW. We don't have the best QB depth chart in the country. These recruits don't care who the 2nd and 3rd string QB's are.Clemson will get elite WR recruits because of their past history with WR's, the elite status they have reached, and Trevor Lawrence. They don't care about back up QB's.
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW. We don't have the best QB depth chart in the country. These recruits don't care who the 2nd and 3rd string QB's are.Clemson will get elite WR recruits because of their past history with WR's, the elite status they have reached, and Trevor Lawrence. They don't care about back up QB's. Yes we do. Who's is better? Never said Clemson wasn't a great option for Ngata.
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW. We don't have the best QB depth chart in the country. These recruits don't care who the 2nd and 3rd string QB's are.Clemson will get elite WR recruits because of their past history with WR's, the elite status they have reached, and Trevor Lawrence. They don't care about back up QB's. Yes we do. Who's is better? Never said Clemson wasn't a great option for Ngata. No we don't. Locker, Montana, and Heaps would have also been considered the best QB depth chart in the CPI try at one point. Same for Price, Miles, Lindquist, and Williams.One amazing, proven QB like Vince Young, Cam Newton, Mayfield, etc is better than any hypothetical QB depth based on their high school rankings. I'm excited for Eason. Even he worries me that he'll play somewhat well, be nothing special, and still leave early and be picked in the first two rounds.The rest are meh. And I was a big Yankoff guy. Trevor Lawrence wouldn't be behind Jake Haener. It doesn't mean Yankoff and Simeon suck, but I doubt either amount to anything special.
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW. We don't have the best QB depth chart in the country. These recruits don't care who the 2nd and 3rd string QB's are.Clemson will get elite WR recruits because of their past history with WR's, the elite status they have reached, and Trevor Lawrence. They don't care about back up QB's. Yes we do. Who's is better? Never said Clemson wasn't a great option for Ngata. No we don't. Locker, Montana, and Heaps would have also been considered the best QB depth chart in the CPI try at one point. Same for Price, Miles, Lindquist, and Williams.One amazing, proven QB like Vince Young, Cam Newton, Mayfield, etc is better than any hypothetical QB depth based on their high school rankings. I'm excited for Eason. Even he worries me that he'll play somewhat well, be nothing special, and still leave early and be picked in the first two rounds.The rest are meh. And I was a big Yankoff guy. Trevor Lawrence wouldn't be behind Jake Haener. It doesn't mean Yankoff and Simeon suck, but I doubt either amount to anything special. What the fuck are you talking about you idiot? This is the dumbest shit I've ever seen. So our secondary depth isn't the best in the nation because you don't count Molden, Taylor, McKinney, Irvin, Gordon, and Hampton because those guys haven't done anything yet and they're all hypothetical depth? Yeah no STFU. You don't judge a depth chart based on how good the starter is. Having one star QB on the roster does not mean a team has the best QB depth in the country. At one point Oregon had Marcus Mariota at QB and every single QB behind him on the roster was absolute dog shit. Did Oregon have the best QB depth in the country when Mariota won the heisman? Fuck no you idiot! They had to take TWO graduate transfers after him because their QB depth was so bad. You judge depth by combining the proven veteran players you have with the physical talent of the unknown guys. There is no fucking QB depth chart in the country with more physical talent waiting in the wings than UW. Yankoff and Sirmon are fucking true Freshman trying to learn a new and much more complex offense all while going against the best secondary talent in the country! Both have the talent to be special but they have to learn the offense and learn how to read defenses. Haener is ahead of them because he's got great arm talent in his own right and has a better idea of what the fuck he's doing. Eason, Haener, Sirmon, Yankoff and Morris > Every other QB depth chart in the country.
Let's see here:1. Our veteran WR's are JAGs and that's easy for any WR recruit to see2. We only have one WR in this class and will only take a maximum of two3. We have the best QB depth chart in the nation4. Bush is a stud recruiter5. Petersen is the best head coach in the conference. Helton is meh. Cristobal is all talk and a loser. 6. John Ross and Dante PettisIt's an easy sell. Out of Ngata, Ford, and McCoy I have to believe at least one of them is smart enough to pick UW. We don't have the best QB depth chart in the country. These recruits don't care who the 2nd and 3rd string QB's are.Clemson will get elite WR recruits because of their past history with WR's, the elite status they have reached, and Trevor Lawrence. They don't care about back up QB's. Yes we do. Who's is better? Never said Clemson wasn't a great option for Ngata. No we don't. Locker, Montana, and Heaps would have also been considered the best QB depth chart in the CPI try at one point. Same for Price, Miles, Lindquist, and Williams.One amazing, proven QB like Vince Young, Cam Newton, Mayfield, etc is better than any hypothetical QB depth based on their high school rankings. I'm excited for Eason. Even he worries me that he'll play somewhat well, be nothing special, and still leave early and be picked in the first two rounds.The rest are meh. And I was a big Yankoff guy. Trevor Lawrence wouldn't be behind Jake Haener. It doesn't mean Yankoff and Simeon suck, but I doubt either amount to anything special. What the fuck are you talking about you idiot? This is the dumbest shit I've ever seen. So our secondary depth isn't the best in the nation because you don't count Molden, Taylor, McKinney, Irvin, Gordon, and Hampton because those guys haven't done anything yet and they're all hypothetical depth? Yeah no STFU. You don't judge a depth chart based on how good the starter is. Having one star QB on the roster does not mean a team has the best QB depth in the country. At one point Oregon had Marcus Mariota at QB and every single QB behind him on the roster was absolute dog shit. Did Oregon have the best QB depth in the country when Mariota won the heisman? Fuck no you idiot! They had to take TWO graduate transfers after him because their QB depth was so bad. You judge depth by combining the proven veteran players you have with the physical talent of the unknown guys. There is no fucking QB depth chart in the country with more physical talent waiting in the wings than UW. Yankoff and Sirmon are fucking true Freshman trying to learn a new and much more complex offense all while going against the best secondary talent in the country! Both have the talent to be special but they have to learn the offense and learn how to read defenses. Haener is ahead of them because he's got great arm talent in his own right and has a better idea of what the fuck he's doing. Eason, Haener, Sirmon, Yankoff and Morris > Every other QB depth chart in the country. I thought the doogs all hung out at dawgman?
